Re: [Cooker-firewall] DNS Server Behind SNF

2001-11-21 Thread Joseph Watson
Florin wrote: Joseph Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello Hello there, I recently tried to move a Server that is running MDK 7.0, Apache, Bind, WuFTP, and Sendmail, behind a SNF. I set up port forwarding for each of the services, but ran into a problem. It seems to be a

Re: [Cooker-firewall] DNS Server Behind SNF

2001-11-21 Thread dave
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 01:32 pm, Joseph Watson wrote: If its a host DNS I don't think you want to do that. I'm not sure what's the best way but I put hosted hosts/domains in hosts (hosts.conf = order hosts,bind) with their local IP#s. Apache virtual hosts also use local IP#s

[Cooker] apt vs. urpmi

2001-11-21 Thread Michael Golden
Hi, I have just recently subscribed to this list because of my concious decision to user the mandrake cooker on a daily basis. i have tried to get MandrakeUpdate/rpmdrake to work but I ran into problems with proxies even though I had it configured properly so I went looking for

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-lib-0.9.4-1mdk

2001-11-21 Thread Claudio
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 09:30 am, Lenny Cartier wrote: [Contrib-RPM] --=-=-= Name: xine-lib Relocations: (not relocateable) - 0.9.4 YES

Re: [Cooker] apt vs. urpmi

2001-11-21 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Michael Golden wrote: I went looking for alternatives and I found the rpm enabled version of apt aparently from the Mandrake Cooker on rpmfind.net although I don't see it in the recent Mandrake cooker. apt is in contrib. seb

Re: [Cooker] python 2.2 (beta2) Co

2001-11-21 Thread RA
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 00:05, you wrote: thankx for python... :) de rien

Re: [Cooker] Did anyone get a gcc 2.95.x working on Cooker

2001-11-21 Thread Oden Eriksson
onsdagen den 21 november 2001 06.33 Peter Ruskin wrote: On Tuesday 20 Nov 2001 13:38, Oden Eriksson wrote: måndagen den 19 november 2001 18.27 Oden Eriksson wrote: måndagen den 19 november 2001 17.55 Brian J. Murrell wrote: There was some talk in the last week or two about a much needed

Re: REPOST: RE: [Cooker] installkernel: AUTOREMOVE does not work

2001-11-21 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is a bug either in installkernel or RPM packaging. installkernel -R is called in kernel posuninstall script; at this moment /sbin/kernel-`uname -r` is already deleted. /usr/share/loader/lilo calls do_check() that checks existence of

Re: [Cooker] apt vs. urpmi

2001-11-21 Thread Yves Duret
Michael Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I have just recently subscribed to this list because of my concious decision to user the mandrake cooker on a daily basis. i have tried to get MandrakeUpdate/rpmdrake to work but I ran into problems with proxies even though I had it

Re: [Cooker] libpng-1.2.0-3mdk.src.rpm

2001-11-21 Thread Yves Duret
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can we get a taskforce going to identify fix the packages affected by the %makeinstall change? The number of packages that aren't rebuilding properly is mounting... finally we keep %makeinstall as previous and the make install DESTDIR=.. is the

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : [..] * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9.4-1mdk - 0.9.4 Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : [..] * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9.4-1mdk - 0.9.4 Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? Sorry, it was intented for Lenny only :-( -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

2001-11-21 Thread Han
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : [..] * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9.4-1mdk - 0.9.4 Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? Sorry, it was intented for Lenny only :-( For all the

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] xine-ui-0.9.4-1mdk

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Han : Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : Ainsi parlait Lenny Cartier : [..] * Wed Nov 21 2001 Lenny Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9.4-1mdk - 0.9.4 Je peux laisser tomber les versions PLF donc ? Sorry, it was intented for

[Cooker] 2.4.13-9 - Install pb's

2001-11-21 Thread guran
Hi VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se) Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20011120 19:32 Hd.img install with devfs, USB on ext3. During harddisk partitioning there is no '/mnt/hd' on the mirror partition. Thus mcc fails to update the 'disks'. Fails to install: guile, guile-devel, sylpheed, xgammon and

Re: [Cooker] napshare instead of gtk-gnutella?

2001-11-21 Thread Digital Wokan
SuSE proved that you can make a 6 CD Linux distro. Why cut Mandrake down? (Not that I want to download 6 .iso files.) Marcio Cordero wrote: Just a short note: as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped

Re: [Cooker] napshare instead of gtk-gnutella?

2001-11-21 Thread Marcio Cordero
1. SuSE doesn't allow to download the 6 CDs anyway, 2. If you check the last time it was updated, you'll see that gtk-gnutella wasn't updated for over one year and a half. Long development cycle :-). If you compare those two, you'll get the feeling that napshare took gtk-gnutella's source and

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Some things I would like to see in the installer... 1) When you select development as an option, all devel packages get installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le mer 21-11-2001 à 04:35, Alan a écrit : Some things I would like to see in the installer... 1) When you select development as an option, all devel packages get installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and find devel packages later on when you are trying

Re: [Cooker] Evolution 1.0 RC (version 0.99) rawks

2001-11-21 Thread Neal Pitts
And here I thought that executable .sig thin was a joke... I thought it was a way to distribute viruses. :) On 15 Nov 2001, Ryan Little wrote: On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 08:42, Mike Tracy Holt wrote: Frederic Crozat wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 05:44:14 +0100, Ryan Little wrote: Just

[Cooker] find-lang and GNOME help files - an update proposal

2001-11-21 Thread Goetz Waschk
Hi everyone, for GNOME packages is the find-lang.sh script from the rpm-build package especially useful, because it can find all the help files of a given program. This works by adding the content of /usr/share/gnome/help/%name to the file list (tagged with lang(language) for all language

[Cooker] Evolution 0.99.2-1mdk IMAP problems?

2001-11-21 Thread Neal Pitts
Has anyone else experienced IMAP problems with the latest Evolution package in cooker? Two things happen for me. First, I never get my message list off the server; second, the mail component crashes after about five minutes. This might be a Ximian problem, but I was curious if anyone else here

Re: [Cooker] napshare instead of gtk-gnutella?

2001-11-21 Thread Marcel Pol
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:24:37 +0100 (MET) Marcio Cordero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a short note: as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (since it doesn't seem to be in dev anymore) and use napshare

Re: [Cooker] Evolution 0.99.2-1mdk IMAP problems?

2001-11-21 Thread Claudio
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 01:42 pm, Neal Pitts wrote: Has anyone else experienced IMAP problems with the latest Evolution package in cooker? Two things happen for me. First, I never get my message list off the server; second, the mail component crashes after about five minutes. This

[Cooker] X for DrakX?

2001-11-21 Thread Mattias Dahlberg
Are there any plans on running DrakX on top of X instead of the framebuffer? I've heard that it's tricky to get X started that early because of the limited resources, but if Red Hat can do it, so can you! :) The strongest reason for using X for DrakX is that Intel's graphics chips which are in

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

2001-11-21 Thread François Pons
Mattias Dahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are there any plans on running DrakX on top of X instead of the framebuffer? I've heard that it's tricky to get X started that early But this is currently the case, we are just limited to XF86_FBDev and XF86_VGA16. because of the limited resources,

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

2001-11-21 Thread Mattias Dahlberg
On 21 Nov 2001, François Pons wrote: The strongest reason for using X for DrakX is that Intel's graphics chips which are in millions of new computers don't have a framebuffer. And using VGA16 for DrakX does not make the program justice, and resembles something from 1991 instead of 2001.

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: The strongest reason for using X for DrakX is that Intel's graphics chips which are in millions of new computers don't have a framebuffer. And using VGA16 for DrakX does not make the program justice, and resembles something from 1991 instead of

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

2001-11-21 Thread Vincent Meyer
And maybe also with a kernel that will do pcmcia networking install? V. On Wednesday 21 November 2001 09:12, you wrote: Yep, latest tests from chmouel showed nice performance with i810fb module. I'm right now integrating it in the install. Prepare to a new install with i810fb for today if no

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

2001-11-21 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Vincent Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And maybe also with a kernel that will do pcmcia networking install? we also working on that.

Re: [Cooker] X for DrakX?

2001-11-21 Thread Blue Lizard
Vincent Meyer wrote: And maybe also with a kernel that will do pcmcia networking install? V. On Wednesday 21 November 2001 09:12, you wrote: Yep, latest tests from chmouel showed nice performance with i810fb module. I'm right now integrating it in the install. Prepare to a new install with

[Cooker] Kernel and samba upgrades

2001-11-21 Thread Cain Brian-BCAIN1
Hi all, Is this the proper venue for listing bugs (or probable bugs) found in cooker rpms? If not, I'd appreciate a pointer to the right place. I recently attempted a kernel upgrade (to 2.4.13-8mdk), but it was unsuccessful. LILO gives me a EBDA too big error, which I've read about

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postgresql-7.1.3-4mdk

2001-11-21 Thread Christian Belisle
Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Christian Belisle : [..] * Mon Nov 19 2001 Christian Belisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7.1.3-4mdk - Fix doc location (Guillaume Rousse) - Remove doc source (Guillaume Rousse) - Fix init script (Guillaume Rousse) I fixed it, you broke it again :-)

Re: [Cooker] nautilus-1.0.6 build problems; patches enclosed

2001-11-21 Thread Ryan T. Sammartino
* Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21/11/2001 01:26]: And since Nautilus 1.0.6 package is intented to be used on cooker only (and not on 8.1 system), there is no point to add this conflict ! Now we're a bit away from the original topic, but I think it would be nice if, as far as possible,

Re: [Cooker] Today's cooker

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DrakX v1.599 Expert upgrade from hd.img still impossible: Same as 9 and 12 November: segmentation fault: seems like memory is missing as the install crashes. why is this happening? (sorry if you already told us..) any information would be liked. --

Re: [Cooker] Evolution 0.99.2-1mdk IMAP problems?

2001-11-21 Thread Brad Felmey
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 06:42, Neal Pitts wrote: Has anyone else experienced IMAP problems with the latest Evolution package in cooker? Nope. Not 100% Cooker, though. Started out 8.0, was 100% Cooker until libpng3 came along, then I decided to sit out a while until it was more stable.

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Alan
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 04:38, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Some things I would like to see in the installer... 1) When you select development as an option, all devel packages get installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] tux-2.1.0-1mdk

2001-11-21 Thread Blue Lizard
Thierry Vignaud wrote: [Contrib-RPM] --=-=-= Name: tux Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 2.1.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Hmm. What about the tux ftp server? Yes, it exists. See speakeasy.rpmfind.net Regards.

[Cooker] Re: [expert] Upgrade from 7.2 to 8.1

2001-11-21 Thread Jun Liu
if you want to upgrade X programs, why not use rpmdrake to do it? it would check the dependencies of various rpm package. I guess it works. But I never tried. :) Good luck, /Jun On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 04:08:55PM -0700, D. R. Evans wrote: :The responses in this thread so far have not been

[Cooker] FW: Request bugzilla bug-creation access

2001-11-21 Thread Craig R Hughes
Forwarding a reports that's bounced around many corners of the mandrake online presence. I'm not subscribed to this cooker list, so if you reply, pleaser make sure to include me on the reply, thanks. C -- Craig's PGP Key http://www.hughes-family.org/craig/pgpkey.html Get PGP, use it.

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] 1) When you select development as an option, all devel packages get installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and find devel packages later on when you are trying to get a piece of code to build. No, development

[Cooker] A new urpmi version a new thread :)

2001-11-21 Thread Han
Hello, No this is not a complaint this is a suggestion. installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/libgphoto2-2.0-0.beta1.3mdk.i586.rpm /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/libusb0.1-0.1.3b-2mdk.i586.rpm /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/modutils-2.4.12-1mdk.i586.rpm /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/gphoto2-2.0-0.beta1.3mdk.i586.rpm

[Cooker] [RPM] pan-0.11.0.91-1mdk.i686.rpm

2001-11-21 Thread Denis Pelletier
Hello, I packaged and uploaded to /incoming the latest release of pan. both src.rpm and i686.rpm are available on my web site: http://pages.infinit.net/boulette/ Denis ___ Denis Pelletier Étudiant au doctorat sciences économiques, Université de

Re: [Cooker] Suggestions for the installer

2001-11-21 Thread Alan
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 13:20, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] 1) When you select development as an option, all devel packages get installed by default. It is a royal pain in the ass to have to go back and find devel packages later on when

[Cooker] A nice review on Mandrake 8.1

2001-11-21 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
You may find it here: http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=604263 sk

[Cooker] evolution deps

2001-11-21 Thread Yura Gusev
GConf aspell aspell-sv bonobo bonobo-conf bug-buddy evolution gdk-pixbuf ^^^? -- 11:51pm up 36 days, 12:48, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\ \_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Cooker] Evolution - print preview error

2001-11-21 Thread Yura Gusev
Double click in message-File-Print Preview Empty page with error Connot allocate default for for printing -- 12:29am up 36 days, 13:25, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\ \_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Cooker] Mandrake rpmlint errors

2001-11-21 Thread Yura Gusev
Hi. There are alot of warnings and some errors in Mandrake packages after rpmlint -a command. Does mandrake trying to fix there own packages? -- 1:45am up 36 days, 14:42, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\

[Cooker] TUI version of MandrakeUpdate?

2001-11-21 Thread Charlie Bebber
Howdy, I exclusively run mandrake on all of my servers (and workstations for that matter) for a couple of different reasons, but most of all for the reiserfs support during install. There are a couple of things that do worry me. One is that there is no server option during install. It's

Re: [Cooker] nautilus-1.0.6 build problems; patches enclosed

2001-11-21 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:18:45 +0100, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Ryan T. Sammartino wrote: - if you have libxml2-devel 2.4.10, then your libxml header files are in /usr/include/libxml. This confuses Nautilus, since it does -I /usr/include *before*

Re: [Cooker] Wine 20011108 and WineX and Mandrake Gaming edition

2001-11-21 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le mer 21-11-2001 à 04:43, Chris Edwards a écrit : There's a new wine snapshot out... diff:s http://www.winehq.com/News/ds20011108.txt I just wonder some things : + If Mandrake want to do a special gaming distribution, why do they not provide Loki games or demos ? A distribution with WineX