>>> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 21:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> > > Hi
>>> > >
>>> > if you ask cooker , i think the answer is "We need a RC3"
>>> > but Mandrakesoft ?
>>>
>>> You think? I see no need for one.
>>
>> me thinks, as i said :-)
>
>Instead of telling we need one, how about telling us why?
Hi
installing 9.2RC2
when choosing expert install, and then choosing all points and the package screen,
except servers. xpdf and mozplugger is not installed,
I have this behavior when installing in vmware and on my workstation.
I guees they should be installed atleast when choosing "multimedi
> Are you planning on testing 9.1 beta on it? I don't have too much time
> available, and would appreciate it if someone took this up and ensured
> that at least there are valid bugzilla entries for cards that failed
> on 8.2 and 9.0 before we hit RCs, then I can spend time doing other stuff
> (pac
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 04:17, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:58:29PM +1300, Jason Greenwood wrote:
> > That is Soo subjective. But I guess when you are paying the
> > developers then
>
hey
we got a Mozilla that works with Flash, whats the point, It didnt make
sense not to r
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 02:01, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 December 2002 01:47, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > tisdagen den 17 december 2002 21.29 skrev psic4t:
> > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > >
> > > ehm, maybe your MUA is a bit broken. there's still enough messages per
>
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 18:17, Austin Acton wrote:
> Hey,
> I wondering if you all have the same problems with mozilla 1.2.1 and
> plugins. As it stands with me:
>
> real 5: works
> flash 6: says it's installed, but flash animations don't run, but
> doesn't crash either
> sun java 1.4.1: works
> ad
st night.
How can I redirect error out from Mozilla, so it doesnt go to /dev/null??
/Glen Kjaerulff