Re: [Cooker] postfix: a piece of documentation regarding the chroot

2003-07-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MandrakeSoft's package of Postfix for security reasons runs chroot'ed by default. thx! english not being my mother language.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] split lists?

2003-07-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
ignored is not pleasant, posting in 2nd category is still much useful and mostly leads to a solution. That should become a FAQ, I guess. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] mandrake9.1 on IBM Thinkpad T40p

2003-07-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. There was a much-needed update to the PCMCIA database just after 9.1 came out. Before that update it was badly outdated. Ah? Updating install forked pcmcia pci-ids db then.. Thanks :). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] postfix: a piece of documentation regarding the chroot

2003-07-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Following bug #3967, I'd like to add a /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.0.12/MANDRAKE.SPECIFIC.CHROOT_README file. I'd write something like the following. Please share with me your wise comments on it. Instead of providing

Re: [Cooker] split lists?

2003-07-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, this is annoying to add one or two CC by hand. As all manual and repetitive task, if it can be automated, it should. Agreed.. of course. People who use scoring don't see that problem. That's just a matter of willingness.. -- Guillaume

Re: [Cooker] apt vs urpmi (No flames)

2003-07-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. some tests I've made: Are you having problems with supermount medias being (so slowly) probed, by any chance? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] apt vs urpmi (No flames)

2003-07-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
it became broken again? This rang a bell, I don't have more information about it but I've naturally suspected it. About Juan, he's doing 9.1 update now, he'll do more cooker work after that. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Licensing questions

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
in a compatibly-licensed larger work (anything non-commercial). But We can't include stuff with restriction for commercial use because we're (commercially) selling the distro. you can't distributed a modified version of Frodo itself. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3796] [drakxtools] NFS sharing : directories with spaces in their name cannot be mounted

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
can you send me the contents of your /etc/modules.conf please? thank you. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] split lists?

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
a matter of categorizing discussions. I happen to not follow closely KDE discussions for example. If people can't categorize (with the subject) in cooker ML, I don't think they will be able to select the right mailing-list to post to. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] postfix: a piece of documentation regarding the chroot

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
on your configuration. -8--8--8--8--8- thanks :). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] split lists?

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 7 Jul 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: It's just a matter of categorizing discussions. I happen to not follow closely KDE discussions for example. If people can't categorize (with the subject) in cooker ML, I don't think they will be able to select

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4164] [aumix] broken special characters in the gtk+2.0 interface

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
(for example, --help), and the console is not necessarily in utf8. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] postfix: a piece of documentation regarding the chroot

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ainsi parlait Guillaume Cottenceau : Following bug #3967, I'd like to add a /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.0.12/MANDRAKE.SPECIFIC.CHROOT_README file. I'd write something like the following. Please share with me your wise comments on it. I'd like

Re: [Cooker] kernel OOPS while scanning partitions during boot

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Glenn Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't boot with the kernel in kernel-2.4.21.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm. I've also 3mdk boots. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] postfix: a piece of documentation regarding the chroot

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ainsi parlait Guillaume Cottenceau : Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ainsi parlait Guillaume Cottenceau : Following bug #3967, I'd like to add a /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.0.12/MANDRAKE.SPECIFIC.CHROOT_README file. I'd write

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] webmin-1.100-1mdk

2003-07-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
magic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why were the mailers removed? (I believe these are standard webmin modules.) These were updates. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Another wrong dependency ?

2003-07-04 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
are done case-sensitively. Urpmi's behaviour is normal. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Another wrong dependency ?

2003-07-04 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No it's not. It's a Charles' bug :). Above call yields only one match, that is abiword-plugin-imagemagick, matches are done case-sensitively. Urpmi's behaviour is normal. Fixing myself: urpmi first does case-sensitive matching, then potentially

Re: [Cooker] so problems

2003-07-03 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 02 Jul 2003 22:50:46 +0200 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: s/%configure/%configure2_5x/ ? That's fine if it works. That might be the origin of the problem, that is. But why not upgrade the distros libtool to 1.5? Well

Re: [Cooker] WARNING: .so problems

2003-07-03 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
the right thing now) Well libtool's maintainer is gwénolé, I'd prefer let him stay maintainer for it.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] cooker traffic

2003-07-03 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
in the past week. Hum, no, cooker traffic would be a little bit different I think. Like Todd did once, or like kernel traffic can be. Sticking to talking about important threads of discussion, rather than announcing new features and important packages changes. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http

Re: [Cooker] cooker traffic

2003-07-03 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
, after which they could be mailed out (but someone like Reinout will know more about that). Regards Buchan -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Congratulations

2003-07-03 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
continue support for HP inkjets. Go Till! Thanks :). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Every package requiring libjpeg62 insists on downloading it again

2003-07-02 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Jay DeKing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tuesday 01 July 2003 8:45 am, Guillaume Cottenceau honored me with this communique: [...] Please next time, tell the version of relevant software and a more precise error scenario so that I can at least try to reproduce. But of course! I

Re: [Cooker] Some Ideas for rescue-mode

2003-07-02 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
to install Mandrake stays the same no, dkpg-reconfigure is far better. or, wait, maybe emerge. can't make my mind.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] so problems

2003-07-02 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
become: libname libname.0 libname.0.0.0 s/%configure/%configure2_5x/ ? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Every package requiring libjpeg62 insists on downloading it again

2003-07-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
all of them manually using rpm -Uvh *.rpm, so long as I delete the libjpeg62-6b-28mdk RPM first. It works for me. Please next time, tell the version of relevant software and a more precise error scenario so that I can at least try to reproduce. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http

Re: [Cooker] gettext and libiconv.so.2

2003-07-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
? ) I'm maintainer for it, but had some headaches in the past so now I don't update to newest version anymore, I sort of expect Pablo to do so :). Pablo, would you like becoming official maintainer of gettext? It would be more sensible than myself I guess.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http

Re: [Cooker] Some Ideas for rescue-mode

2003-07-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
reason to use the rescue CD. -=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=---=-=-- we won't add large utilities that don't fit the aim of the rescue (small ones as well, actually). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] drakxtools-9.2-0.7mdk

2003-07-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
-display(N(Here is a manufacturer: %s, $_)) foreach @manufacturers; === moved to === sub manufacturers { return (N(Canon), N(Epson), N(HP)); } .. $gtk-display(N(Here is a manufacturer: %s, $_)) foreach manufacturers(); Please choose any solution to fix printerdrake. Thanks! -- Guillaume

Re: [Cooker] Some Ideas for rescue-mode

2003-07-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: we won't add large utilities that don't fit the aim of the rescue (small ones as well, actually). Granted, but is it unreasonable to request an editor that most newbies would be able to use

Re: [Cooker] rpm to tar.gz

2003-07-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: how do you change a rpm file to tar.gz file. and if a file extention is .cxx which compiler is it. rpm2cpio meuh.rpm | cpio -d that's C++, e.g. use g++ to compile that PS : that's not a support channel indeed.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http

Re: [Cooker] Some Ideas for rescue-mode

2003-07-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
don't want to make you hangry, just do as you want, but a lot of newbie don't know vi. look at my other mails :). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] postfix 2.0.12 doesn't work with cyrus-sasl 2.1.12

2003-06-28 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. mixing postfix from cooker with the rest from 9.1). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
has been lost on that, and we now have other interesting subjects to discuss. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Postfix sasl

2003-06-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
cooker? (postfix of 9.1 uses libsasl7). Cooker package doesn't work : same problem. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Postfix sasl

2003-06-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pierre BETOUIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, Why can't we find the directory /usr/lib/sasl when cyrus-sasl and postfix are both installed ? Because you need to install the correct sasl plugins? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: Enterprise mail server (was Re: [Cooker] Cooker development - how do things happen?)

2003-06-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
: ../base/hdlist.cz list: list.cooker } :( (e.g. urpmf on our compilation cluster won't print contrib stuff) (yes, even though it is in contrib, doesn't mean it's config entry in postfix should be wrong). yes of course :). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday 26 June 2003 22:36, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: it'll be tomorrow. I've had trouble fixing a nasty translation/utf8 bug i've only tracked down minutes before going out to my japanese language yearly exam. sorry for the delay. I could install

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 27 June 2003 22:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I could install rpms with rpmdrake today but after some time using it i got this error Cannot make temp dir /tmp/rpmdrake.AKjRIp Could not create temporary

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
prior to the mkstemp failure? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-26 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Jason Straight [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 25 June 2003 15:12, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If i try to start rpmdrake i get this Can't call method signal_connect on an undefined value at /usr/lib/libDrakX/ugtk2.pm line 1282

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-26 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
), and myself (as the developer who was going to implement it). We had more or less convergent ideas when it went to trying to simplify the UI for beginners. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

2003-06-26 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
any reason why you can't.. please go ahead! PS: **please**, ***pretty please***, quote correctly.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-26 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
for newbies. And IMO, it would be more confusing to have one show installed packages checkbox that would make them appear as a tree at the end of non-installed packages. Eric -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpmdrake

2003-06-25 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
as well in cooker. I'll do tomorrow. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's

2003-06-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: [PATCH] Final mkinitrd support for 2.5 (on ix86 at least)

2003-06-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
not yet time to upload a mkinitrd, and friends, to cooker then? Are you working with juan or nicolas planel on this, or is it to be done later? Thanks for your hard work.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: Re[2]: double-clicking on files directly from CD's

2003-06-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
fstype. I was mistaken. Should I take is (from your Cc to Pixel) that Mandrake does not use supermount for removables anymore? Ah, hum, no. I suck :(. Sorry. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's

2003-06-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 20 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: I personally don't use supermount anymore, because it's completely unusable since it's so bugged in the 2.4 (it was nice in the 2.2), so actually my patch doesn't help at all with supermount. That is because your

Re: [Cooker] Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's

2003-06-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (ok..I am being a bit mean here, but I have hope to secretly manipulate GC to push kernelteam a bit, or to at least comment on it. supermount-ng really needs to go in 9.2). I am impotent

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
-- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-20 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
toolbar contains functional information). 1b)Have a checkbox for search in installed packages In my eternal quest for keeping rpmdrake UI-simple, I sort of don't want to add a toolbar or another checkbox if they are not very important.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
to Packages Groups choices during install. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
FACORAT Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le mar 17/06/2003 à 22:10, andre a écrit : On Tuesday 17 June 2003 22:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Argh. another addition to the GUI.. More like rpmdrake and rpmdrake-remove are just not the right tool for non-root users to select rpms

double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed * software

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
and load time, maybe we can enable/disable features with switches? That makes a rather large difference, I don't think maintaining such a feature under a switch will be doable in the real world. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re[2]: [PATCH] Final mkinitrd support for 2.5 (on ix86 at least)

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No need for the hack, if the package name is versioned as it should be, kernel2.5 suffices. hack is sometimes needed to explicitely show to users that it's unstable. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pixel do you think we can add mode=0644 for cd and dvd drives, in the install, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c? no pb. IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing

Re: [Cooker] something nice for the devs...

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pat on the back for everybody. =) thx. forwarded to gael, might appear as a link on our website. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: wrong font charset in post-install configuration diff list

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
but it must be in contribs)? Would fit just nice here. It was already asked, yes. The problem is that that guy wants emacs to do that, the other vim, the other.. I think current situation is a good compromise: it could be better but everyone can use it from scratch. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
that was ignored. This is currently not homogeneous among filesystems anyway :/. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
) supports ignoring options that don't apply to the filesystem it finds, and supermount may also. To achieve that it needs to maintain a list of all options for all filesystems, does it really do that?? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: Re[2]: [PATCH] Final mkinitrd support for 2.5 (on ix86 at least)

2003-06-18 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
- they do work for me so unless I will get feedback I do not have anything really important to change ... (I do have some plans :) Ok. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-18 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tuesday 17 June 2003 22:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Argh. another addition to the GUI.. More like rpmdrake and rpmdrake-remove are just not the right tool for non-root users to select rpms. I would remove your May 28 addition. Buchan's suggestion

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-2mdk

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. I was (am) unsure of what kind of feedback you want/need. Thanks, S -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le Lundi 16 Juin 2003 17:52, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : It would be better that rpmdrake also show already-installed software, maybe greyed out or with a mention this software is already installed on your machine. No, it's a long

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: I still fail to see why people start installing software to see installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given program for a given task, isn't it? I launche installing software when I want to install

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. There is also an API problem probably (remember, maintainance). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-2mdk

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: magic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I know this is the cooker, but is this package also be considered as an upgrade for 9.1 (isn't this a base package)? No, no cooker package are suitable for upgrading 9.1, or it's

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
be started from MCC (or root terminal etc). Yes though maybe a special menu entry would maybe be nice.. but I'm not sure it would not be too much for the menu. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 11:57, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : I still fail to see why people start installing software to see installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given program for a given task, isn't it? I launche installing

Re: [Cooker] rpm evaluating %_host differently vs 9.1/9.0 etc

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
, not for %_host -- but I'm not sure that was your question :/. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: [PATCH] Final mkinitrd support for 2.5 (on ix86 at least)

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Sorry for the so long delay in answering.. Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 16 May 2003 18:26, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: why not deciding on $kernel like you do for deciding if bootsplash need be disabled? It is needed anyway. It is impossible to just parse

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've ^ haha, I think Buchan was a bit too annoying? No, it's that other times he's right. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:39, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And of course, at present rpmdrake can only be run as root. If it were Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've said I would add

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
/BIG/distrib/9.1/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/postfix-2.0.6-1mdk.i586.rpm | cpio -id 11491 blocks [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/rpm/tmp/t] find | xargs ldd 2/dev/null | grep sasl | uniq libsasl.so.7 = /usr/lib/libsasl.so.7 (0x40071000) -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
sometime this week so we can start rebuilding? Well I'm not too good at server stuff etc, I'd prefer official maintainer to do so.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] rpmmon -p /RPMS/libdb4.0-4.0.14-6mdk.i586.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Damien? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
? Should this be done in the postfix build-me-my-chroot %post script? All works fine now. I guess, really, saslauthd should be able to listen on multiple sockets. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] perl-GTK-0.7008-30mdk

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Olivier Thauvin wrote: Le Vendredi 13 Juin 2003 17:43, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could we maybe get perl-OpenGL packaged instead? We try to not put any library, when there is no program requiring

Re: [Cooker] Postfix auth using saslauthd - pam

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
faster :). Is there anything that should still badly need sasl1 in the 9.2? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] urpm-cleanup

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
-only packages (no depending packages), give the user the option to delete them. There could This is already existing for a long time and is called urpmi_rpm-find-leaves. A new feature of cooker-rpmdrake is to allow showing those (sorted by install date) in the rpmdrake-remove mode. -- Guillaume

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
greyed out or with a mention this software is already installed on your machine. No, it's a long time decision. Though, this can lead to an interesting idea: when doing a search and nothing is found, I might add a special dialog when some already installed software match, right. -- Guillaume

[Cooker] Re: [Bug 4013] [rpmdrake] New: Package dependencies stay in memory forever

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: [Bug 4018] [rpmdrake] New: rpmdrake doesn't clear dependencies after cancel

2003-06-16 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
@duplicate=4013 -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-2.0.12-1mdk

2003-06-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
postfix to be able to really test the difference. Can someone test the 2.0.12-2mdk please? db4.1 (other posts), shouldn't this be built against those? Please provide links, I've not noticed anything on db4.1 and can't see any db4.1 package in cooker at this moment. -- Guillaume Cottenceau

Re: [Cooker] Postfix auth using saslauthd - pam

2003-06-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
and postfix is bind to ldap and it is not good to use sasl v1 libs and sasl v2 libs in one application. Argh :(. Should I revert 2.0.12-2mdk change then? (pardon my lack of knowledge in postfix field..) -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-GTK-0.7008-30mdk

2003-06-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could we maybe get perl-OpenGL packaged instead? We try to not put any library, when there is no program requiring it in the distro.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-GTK-0.7008-30mdk

2003-06-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Olivier Thauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le Vendredi 13 Juin 2003 17:43, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could we maybe get perl-OpenGL packaged instead? We try to not put any library, when there is no program requiring it in the distro.. I do

Re: [Cooker] SDL12 build fix with gcc 3.3

2003-06-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
, which is highly probable. PS : please could you remove quoted text that is unneeded -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Is Cooker in an Installable State Right Now.

2003-06-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] automake-1.4 vs. automake1.7

2003-06-06 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
automake1.4 or 1.7 (or 1.5, or 1.6, or..?) for most packages. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] automake-1.4 vs. automake1.7

2003-06-06 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
, automake1.7 in machine A, automake1.6 in B, automake1.4 in C) I strongly disagree. Packages with simple Makefile.am files for example don't need any strict require on any automake version. Any version should do the job. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake

2003-06-06 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
.. francois, did you brea^Wchanged resolve_requested somehow in these releases? investigating on my side, but I'm not sure I can fix tonight. if not, it'll have to wait wednesday. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake

2003-06-06 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: was still working for me today, i've upgraded to latest urpmi/perl-URPM and now I see the same problem. i strongly suspect perl-URPM 0.90-7mdk or 0.90-8mdk.. ok, seems that API has changed. it's too late for me to do changes safely

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-21mdk

2003-05-31 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Vincent Meyer, MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 30 May 2003 06:15 am, Buchan Milne wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Though I agree, I remain skeptical as to why it has never been mentioned for urpmi which has

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-21mdk

2003-05-31 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
--mediums to be removed now. Guillaume, I wonder where you see urpmi was using medias ? Actually urpmi is not strictly using medias for plural, it's using media for singular, for example in urpmi.addmedia manpage: urpmi.addmedia - adds a new rpms media for use with urpmi etc -- Guillaume

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpmdrake-2.1-22mdk

2003-05-31 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 12:45, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: - fix media/medias by medium/media - edit-medias: Ah...the irony. :) argh just copied-pasted from previous changelog, sorry. but you'll notice i've changed the binary name accordingly

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >