On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:17, Pixel wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > something must have gone wrong with one of the 2 installs. can you
> > > provide /root/drakx/report.bug.gz on both boxes?
> > I can't provide the "
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:41, Pixel wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:56, Pixel wrote:
> > > Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > I'm doing some tests with replay
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
> >
> > I ran apt-get update and upgrade this morning.
>
> Is "testing" or "unstable" more up to date?
unstable
For more information, please read: "Debian testing distribution" [1]
[1] = http://www.debian.org/devel/testing
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:34, Guy.Bormann wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm,
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:41, Greg Meyer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 10 February 2003 03:15 am, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Stupid estimation! My name isn't Martin Schulze!!! I was sent a mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] containi
two the people will damn me about
MandrakeSoft bankruptcy.It's a Debian Project conspiracy!
troll ;)
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
>
> Just a lurker on this thread (since it's really gone awry), but I would
> say definitely not. You'v
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 01:21, Han Boetes wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How many possibilities of add systrace[1] in the next release in
> > kernel-secure? It's sounds very good and not impact any system
> > without a policy con
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:51, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 22:28, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> > Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
> >
> > please guys don'
27;s are doing it, i'm doing the pratical job only.
> >
> So the CSO's are asking you to get that level of security, while they
> are running a product from a company that has filed for bankrupty. OK.
Explained above.I was doing it with other distribution.
> What are you trying to protect against the script kiddies?
My job :P
> [...]
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 18:09, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But the discussion under this subject is: Why not systrace on the next
> > kernel-secure? Can any developer clarify to me?
>
> just because it is not a priority
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:28, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
>
> please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
> useless and out of
rying stop a parallel discussion about "apt x urpmi", did you see?
Finally, what's the thread that are you reading?
Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
I known msec and it's really good.
> There is a lot of customized software, such as KDE, the kernel, or xmms
> ( http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/ )
>
> And there is more, but, this should be enough.
> So , merging the differences would not be interesting, for all the works it
> represent.
Yes, but we can share our experiences.
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;s the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
I can expose some Debian tools that do the same as: libapt-pkg-perl,
aptitude, gnome-apt, debconf(perl), cdebconf(The C *port* of debconf
code being used in d-i, the new installer).
And now, we can stop with this discussion about "apt x urpmi" !
Please,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 18:37, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The latest Debian release, called Woody doesn't supports XFS officially,
> > but you can use a solution[1] made by a developer.The reason is very
> > simple:
oals at: http://www.spi-inc.org/goals.
If the new Mandrake Community will follow these terms you can contact
SPI members about your interests using spi-general[1].
[1] = http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-general
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 15:38, John Goerzen wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Mandrake as a new project inside Debian.But it was refused here, many feels
> > involved.But if you change the original idea, try debian-project ML.The
> > Debian-
own hands, or use the unstable
branch.It's more safe to all users.
This subject isn't about "Stability x Features" and/or "Debian x
Mandrake", please don't damn me about your own way and your own choices.
[1] = http://people.debian.org/~blade/XFS-Install/
[2] = http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206
bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 07:47, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 01:13, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
>
> > > But, I don't think we need to be a carbon copie of Debian.
> > > Debian is not the only volunteers OS project, everybody seems to forget
> >
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 08:49, Buchan Milne wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
> > upgrade".I can see :P
> >
>
> We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto&#
to decide how much security is adequate.
CSO's are doing it, i'm doing the pratical job only.
But the discussion under this subject is: Why not systrace on the next
kernel-secure? Can any developer clarify to me?
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 18:17, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 18:04, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 20:28, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > > Well, we could try something like morethan one developper per package.
> > > Actually, in De
with newer(buggy) packages and flame about Debian project.
bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian Desktop? You can help with the new installer, called: d-i based
on cdebconf and start a new subproject or enhance a existing one.
> If we clone debian, this is useless. But we can try something different.
Right!
Just for fun:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#policy
http://www.debian.org/doc/misc-manuals#history
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:41, Pixel wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:56, Pixel wrote:
> > > Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > I'm doing some tests with replay
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:52, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >How many possibilities of add systrace[1] in the next release in
> >kernel-secure? It's sounds very good and not impact any system
> >without a policy configur
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:56, Pixel wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm doing some tests with replay install of drakx(Mandrake 9.0).
> >
> > The first install occurs perfectly and in the last step i built
> > the floppy to r
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:53, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > How many possibilities of add systrace[1] in the next release in
> > kernel-secure? It's sounds very good and not impact any system
> >
uestion is: How can i see differences between 'rpm -qa' of
two machines ? Yes, i can and i see.
Is it normal? Why? If it isn't normal, i can attach the results
and my reports here or publish in the web.
Thanks in advance,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s/systrace/linux.html
http://www.systrace.org
Can i request it as feature? Or what?
bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
32 matches
Mail list logo
