http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-13-11 05:10 ---
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:49, [fgriffin] wrote:
I'm having a similar problem with KDM. It's not a fresh install, but
when using kdm, if I select KDE it logs in with
Quoting Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Still a little issue in test9-4mdk : you should compile capability
(CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=yes) in the kernel, not a module (,
otherwise bind can't be started until capability module is loaded..
thanks, it will be done in next release
--
Quoting Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:05:14 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried the test9-4mdk last night on my mostly updated cooker box and
found that there is no module for my network card. I have a Netgear
fa310 pci ethernet card and it was using the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5556
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-16-10 22:14 ---
if you go to /usr/share/ as root and do ln -s applnk-mdk/.hidden
applnk-mdk.hidden the screensavers will work.. no other solution worked for me.
--
Configure
I installed RC2 on a laptop last week and then updated to cooker on Saturday
night and I noticed both on RC2 and with the cooker update that KDE takes quite
a bit longer to login than it used to, rather about twice to three times longer.
Has anyone else noticed this? It seems faster on my
Quoting Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed RC2 on a laptop last week and then updated to cooker on
Saturday
night and I noticed both on RC2 and with the cooker update that KDE
takes quite
a bit longer to
Quoting Brant Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:47, Udo Rader wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:20:05 + schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
...
no.
I don't understand some
Quoting Jan Ciger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
| i know, and i have the same opinion as you,
| but what can we do ?-(
Maybe let Madrakians publicly know what we think about this move ? IMHO
it is a suicidal move for them,
I think this may help:
http://www1.mandrakelinux.com/en/mdkads.php3
it clears up some misconceptions and definitely eases my mind regarding the
situation.
I think the problem is that when you say Ad people think of the most common
example: spam or popups. Those are very intrusive and
Ainsi parlait Ken Thompson :
On Monday 11 August 2003 10:24 am, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Ken Thompson :
How are they getting my personal IP when I'm connecting through a
firewall?
Cause they are in the mail enveloppe headers.
Does Kmail send this info somehow and if
First version uploaded, impacted packages are bootsplash, initscripts
and libmng.
Add splash=silent in you kernel command line to activate the
quiet progress bar mode.
Basic info at:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/BootSplashHowTo
--
Warly
thank you, thank you, thank
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3286
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-13 23:30 ---
I recently started creating my own bootsplash themes and found that, for
some reason the code that loads the graphic is looking for a signature
that is put in the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 04:30 ---
is this just using vncserver for a new X session or using rfbdrake to
share out the :0 display? I was able to get tightvnc to work fine with
Gnome and KDE just today
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2202
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 21:30 ---
you can delete the .fonts-conf in $HOME and that will revert to the default
with is no sub-pixel hinting
Scott
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2702
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 16:30 ---
tekjunky wrote:
I've seen this as well... If you turn off preview images, the blinking
stops and does not come back... I think it has something to do with
Konqueror
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2808
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 16:30 ---
I've seen this problem as well, but with urpmi updating between, I
think, Beta2 or 3 and cooker sometime after RC1. I remember because I
had customized the menu
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 20:40 ---
I to have this problem on a Dell Inspiron Laptop. Noticed when i
installed RC1. It's been updated to cooker as of two days ago...
Scott
--- You are receiving
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2824
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 21:00 ---
I just tried that (I had 510 in my directory), but when starting
konqueror, it still flickered. Checking the directory I found more
.font.cache files... I looks and
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2824
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 21:50 ---
Actually, I don't have view hidden files enabled. In the Konqueror
window there is just 18 items... no dot-files are showing. I was
viewing the creation of the
- Original Message -
From: et [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1179] [kdebase] Mandrake's new kdm is welcomed
with extreme displeasure
On Thursday 20 February 2003 09:17 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN
I like all the fonts to be anti-aliased, even small ones.
just my $0.02 worth
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Himpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cooker mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] anti-aliasing in OpenOffice.org
On
I just bought some 700mb CD-RW disks from Walmart... I haven't tried burning
beta 4 on them... I'm thinking of waiting for the next beta/RC .
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Sitsofe Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:13 AM
Subject: Re:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:34:53AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
Sorry to dredge this up but as Mandrake 9 is still in beta I'm
reminded of few points in theregister review of Mandrake 8.2
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25160.html).
In it the reviewer which mentioned how a
23 matches
Mail list logo
