[danny] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It sounds as you actually want fsck to check journalled drives,
yes, i do want checking journalized fses by default if the user does
not choose anything.
while, in my experience, the journal update at mount is much safer
than fsck
in my experience, not
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
[danny] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It sounds as you actually want fsck to check journalled drives,
yes, i do want checking journalized fses by default if the user does
not choose anything.
while, in my experience, the journal update at mount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
while, in my experience, the journal update at mount is much safer
than fsck
in my experience, not checking journalized fses can results in slowly
accumulating small corruption
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4862
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-09 13:31 ---
Thierry,
I am not sure i understand your message.
It sounds as you actually want fsck to check journalled drives, while, in my
experience, the
journal update at
I think this is an ext3 probleme ... I don't understand why diskdrake
default fs type is not xfs.
Le mer 17/09/2003 à 13:49, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
[danny] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It sounds as you actually want fsck to check journalled drives,
yes, i do want checking journalized fses
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
I think this is an ext3 probleme ... I don't understand why diskdrake
default fs type is not xfs.
well, I trust ext3 a lot more more than xfs. And it has all kinds of other
avantages as well (backwards compatible, drivers for other OS).
The
Does this also apply to jfs? I mean, I have seen jfs do diskchecks after crashes quite
often and I always felt safe as a baby in it's mothers arms :)
# Han
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4862
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-24-08 00:38 ---
I did see it on cooker, but I was 1 month behind with updating. Today I updated
again, but I
cannot easily test since I have a black console screen on my cooker box
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4862
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-24-08 00:28 ---
Danny, it seems much better on 9.2b2 than on 9.1, I had an automatic reboot
(instead of seeing the REBOOT LINUX message) on my new 9.2b2 install, and I
can't get it to
