Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pixel,
The below is for a {customized, install, development} install.
The situation is much worse for an {expert, install, workstation}
vanilla install. In this case the nfs-utils RPM is not even
installed The nfs-utils-clients RPM is
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The sysvinit installation of Mandrake 7.2 beta, just like all its
predecessors, still fails to start the nfs daemon.
yeah, good question. florin any reason why in /etc/init.d/nfs there is
# chkconfig: - 60 20
On 9 Oct 2000, Florin Grad wrote:
now, this is a great debate.
Should we or should we not start nfs at boot time ?
Hi, IMHO the best option is by default to have the bare minimum of
services started after install - if people need a service they should have
to explictly turn it on. This
Florin Grad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
now, this is a great debate.
Should we or should we not start nfs at boot time ?
we've chosen that services get started if the package is installed. The install
takes care of not installing stuff in desktop install for eg.
so change it!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Massey) writes:
On 9 Oct 2000, Florin Grad wrote:
now, this is a great debate.
Should we or should we not start nfs at boot time ?
Hi, IMHO the best option is by default to have the bare minimum of
services started after install - if people need a service they
On Sun Oct 08, 2000 at 08:02:44PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
The sysvinit installation of Mandrake 7.2 beta, just like all its
predecessors, still fails to start the nfs daemon.
Huh? I've installed RC1 on my desktop machine twice this past weekend
and once on a laptop... in all three cases
Florin Grad wrote:
now, this is a great debate.
Should we or should we not start nfs at boot time ?
The default option is set on NOT to run nfs at boot. Why ?
I see several reasons for this:
- A newbie with enough space on his hard drive would choose full install
(in custom section) so
I'd disagree with that - I think that for security reasons all network
services should not be started by default until configured to do so by the
user no matter what they say the machine is going to be used as. Anyone who
plans on running a server of any kind should at least know what service
Pixel,
The below is for a {customized, install, development} install.
The situation is much worse for an {expert, install, workstation}
vanilla install. In this case the nfs-utils RPM is not even
installed The nfs-utils-clients RPM is installed. No sense
here.
Ron Stodden wrote:
The sysvinit installation of Mandrake 7.2 beta, just like all its
predecessors, still fails to start the nfs daemon.
This means that remote machines are unable to get a mount of a local
file system at all - Permission Refused.
I have personally reported this a number of times, and am
NFS works fine here.
On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
The sysvinit installation of Mandrake 7.2 beta, just like all its
predecessors, still fails to start the nfs daemon.
This means that remote machines are unable to get a mount of a local
file system at all - Permission Refused.
I have
Jason Straight wrote:
NFS works fine here.
What kind of install?
My standard is en_UK - US international keyboard - customized -
install - development - all packages - local network, no DNS, no
proxy.
--
Regards,
Ron. [AU]
same except for expert and with DNS.
nfs-utils-clients-0.2.1-1mdk
nfs-utils-0.2.1-1mdk
portmap-4.0-11mdk
initscripts-5.27-37mdk
On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
Jason Straight wrote:
NFS works fine here.
What kind of install?
My standard is en_UK - US international keyboard -
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The sysvinit installation of Mandrake 7.2 beta, just like all its
predecessors, still fails to start the nfs daemon.
yeah, good question. florin any reason why in /etc/init.d/nfs there is
# chkconfig: - 60 20
where it should be
# chkconfig: 345 60 20
Jason Straight wrote:
same except for expert and with DNS.
nfs-utils-clients-0.2.1-1mdk
nfs-utils-0.2.1-1mdk
portmap-4.0-11mdk
initscripts-5.27-37mdk
Here:
VERSION: Linux-mandrake Ulysses-i586 20001007 17:53
nfs-utils-clients-0.2.1-1mdk
nfs-utils-0.2.1-1mdk
portmap-4.0-11mdk
There is one difference - I compile my own kernel - I wonder if nfs got left
out of the mdk kernel you are using?
On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
Jason Straight wrote:
same except for expert and with DNS.
nfs-utils-clients-0.2.1-1mdk
nfs-utils-0.2.1-1mdk
portmap-4.0-11mdk
Jason Straight wrote:
There is one difference - I compile my own kernel - I wonder if nfs got left
out of the mdk kernel you are using?
No, nfs and its daemon are installed, just the daemon isn't started.
But Pascal R. (aka Pixel) is on to it now, and concedes a problem in
the
17 matches
Mail list logo
