Edward Tandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > huh...
> > 9.1beta3 cd1 653 MB
> > 9.1beta3 cd2 649 MB
> > 9.1beta3 cd3 646 MB
>
> Downloaded from on of the French mirrors last night...
>
> 685211648 Jan 31 19:15 MandrakeLinux-9.1beta3-CD1.i586.iso
> 681541632 Jan 31 20:13 MandrakeLinux-9.1beta3-CD
Edward Tandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I also tried using the "blank.img" boot image and puting my own kernel
> onto it, but that failed too because I compile both my network drivers
> and isofs into the kernel. The installer tries to load the modules,
> fails and the installation abort
> I am trying to install Beta 3 on a machine with an Asus A7V8X
> motherboard and a Athlon XP 1500 processor.
>
> I have tried both graphical and text mode and it only gets as far as
> uncompressing the kernel. It then hangs. I have also tried the
> mem=nopentium option.
>
> I have this machine w
Hi.
On Wed 2003-02-05 at 00:51:03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 23:59, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> > From: "Edward Tandi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > | I have just tried the CD too. It fails also, so I have just wasted a
> > | fine 700MB CD. Why Mandrake has the inability to pro
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 23:59, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> From: "Edward Tandi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | I have just tried the CD too. It fails also, so I have just wasted a
> | fine 700MB CD. Why Mandrake has the inability to produce 650MB ISO
> | images dispite the overwhelming demand for them on Mandr
From: "Edward Tandi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| I have just tried the CD too. It fails also, so I have just wasted a
| fine 700MB CD. Why Mandrake has the inability to produce 650MB ISO
| images dispite the overwhelming demand for them on Mandrake Club I'll
| never know.
|
huh...
9.1beta3 cd1 653 MB
9.
I have just tried the CD too. It fails also, so I have just wasted a
fine 700MB CD. Why Mandrake has the inability to produce 650MB ISO
images dispite the overwhelming demand for them on Mandrake Club I'll
never know.
I think the problem is due to compiling the kernel with gcc 3.2.1. Does
anyone k
