Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread andre
Op zo 03-02-2002, om 05:02 schreef David Walser: > If the distribution you're referring to is Mandrake, I > think it was configured like this out of the box in > 8.1, but I've upgraded to Cooker stuff so that's not > the case anymore (I think it was the XFree86 upgrade). > I forget now how Mandra

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread andre
> > If the distribution you're referring to is Mandrake, I > think it was configured like this out of the box in > 8.1, but I've upgraded to Cooker stuff so that's not > the case anymore (I think it was the XFree86 upgrade). > I forget now how Mandrake did it in 8.1, I think I > figured it out b

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread Quel Qun
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 19:42, andre wrote: > Op zo 03-02-2002, om 04:19 schreef Peter Ruskin: > > On Sunday 03 Feb 2002 02:58, andre wrote: > > > Op zo 03-02-2002, om 03:50 schreef David Walser: > > > > Yeah try it in a KDE or Gtk+ app. For some reason it > > > > won't work in a terminal (even tho

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread David Walser
If the distribution you're referring to is Mandrake, I think it was configured like this out of the box in 8.1, but I've upgraded to Cooker stuff so that's not the case anymore (I think it was the XFree86 upgrade). I forget now how Mandrake did it in 8.1, I think I figured it out before. One pos

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread andre
Op zo 03-02-2002, om 04:19 schreef Peter Ruskin: > On Sunday 03 Feb 2002 02:58, andre wrote: > > Op zo 03-02-2002, om 03:50 schreef David Walser: > > > Yeah try it in a KDE or Gtk+ app. For some reason it > > > won't work in a terminal (even though a terminal is > > > capable of displaying the ch

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Sunday 03 Feb 2002 02:58, andre wrote: > Op zo 03-02-2002, om 03:50 schreef David Walser: > > Yeah try it in a KDE or Gtk+ app. For some reason it > > won't work in a terminal (even though a terminal is > > capable of displaying the character). > > > > --- andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread andre
Op zo 03-02-2002, om 03:50 schreef David Walser: > Yeah try it in a KDE or Gtk+ app. For some reason it > won't work in a terminal (even though a terminal is > capable of displaying the character). > > --- andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Op zo 03-02-2002, om 03:19 schreef David Walser: > >

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread David Walser
Yeah try it in a KDE or Gtk+ app. For some reason it won't work in a terminal (even though a terminal is capable of displaying the character). --- andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Op zo 03-02-2002, om 03:19 schreef David Walser: > > No it works with standard US > > > > those special character

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread andre
Op zo 03-02-2002, om 03:19 schreef David Walser: > No it works with standard US > > those special characters are just in the 128-255 ASCII > > --- andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is only with us-international(or a locale > > keymap) not with standard > > us. > > I us standard US keybo

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread David Walser
No it works with standard US those special characters are just in the 128-255 ASCII --- andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is only with us-international(or a locale > keymap) not with standard > us. > __ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking ne

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread andre
Op za 02-02-2002, om 07:19 schreef David Walser: > > --- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would you know if there is a clear explanation of > > all these key > > combinations and charsets? It blows my surviving > > brain cell everytime I > > try to find my way through all of this. I have t

[Cooker] Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-02 Thread Liam Quin
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:54:22PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote: > Alt pops up the Mandrake menu at the moment and this is annoying. I just > hope it is temporary. This drove me nuts for a while too, I thought my keyboard mapping was wrong. It was a Panel preference in the end, so gnome control center

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-01 Thread David Walser
--- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you know if there is a clear explanation of > all these key > combinations and charsets? It blows my surviving > brain cell everytime I > try to find my way through all of this. I have the > feeling I am not the > only one. What is it you want exac

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-01 Thread Quel Qun
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 21:34, David Walser wrote: > OK, in 8.1 Mandrake set up the right Windows key as > the Multi_key, which seems not to still be the case in > Cooker (hopefully they'll fix that). So, if you're on > Cooker, run: > xmodmap -e "keycode 116 = Multi_key" > as a temporary fix. > >

Re: [Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-01 Thread David Walser
OK, in 8.1 Mandrake set up the right Windows key as the Multi_key, which seems not to still be the case in Cooker (hopefully they'll fix that). So, if you're on Cooker, run: xmodmap -e "keycode 116 = Multi_key" as a temporary fix. Then, when you're typing, hit the right windows key (and release)

[Cooker] About the little ®

2002-02-01 Thread Quel Qun
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 20:28, Michael Holt wrote: > 7:18pm... Quel Qun carefully chose these words: > > "IntelliMouse® 1.1A PS/2 > > Sorry for the stupid question; how did you get that little 'R' with the > circle around it? > Mike, I use gnome, and there is a utility called gcharmap displa