--- Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Walser wrote on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at
> 05:44:09AM -0700 :
> >
> > 2) Mandrake still has incorrect buildarchtranslate
> > lines in the system /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc,
> translating
> > everything to i586.
>
> It's a
> standard. You as the
FOR MANDRAK
--- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem you run into is some people building
> RPMs aren't going to
> know this and will end up distributing i686 or
> Athlon or whatever
> archs...
Oh, one more thing I wanted to add. *If* that script
I mentioned that creates an RPM build environ
--- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem you run into is some people building
> RPMs aren't going to
> know this and will end up distributing i686 or
> Athlon or whatever
> archs...
>From the package names you get, it's obvious which
arch the build is for. If you were to distribu
David Walser wrote on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:44:09AM -0700 :
>
> 2) Mandrake still has incorrect buildarchtranslate
> lines in the system /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc, translating
> everything to i586.
No, it's not wrong. It's a default. It's a standard. You as the
sysadmin are free to change the defa
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:18:29AM -0700, David Walser wrote:
> It was actually changed by mistake, but that's been
> one of the excuses to defend it. If someone's gonna
> rebuild an SRPM, more than likely optimization one of
> the top reasons. Anyway, /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc is the
> *system* rpmrc,
good source of info is #mdk-athlon on irc.openprojects.net
ragards
Arkitekt
Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 11:32, Stéphane Teletchéa a écrit :
> I did some recompilation of src rpm (nvidia), and they are still compiled
> for i586 ...
>
> Stef
--
Future Is Free, Fight Against Bill & Friends
Linux
--- "Gregory K. Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 23 September 2002 10:11, David Walluck
> wrote:
> > It's definitely wrong. Just because Mandrake is
> built for i586 doesn't
> > mean we want to force every arch to i586 (or
> i686). In the case of
> > Athlon, it may actually be a downg
On Monday 23 September 2002 10:11, David Walluck wrote:
> It's definitely wrong. Just because Mandrake is built for i586 doesn't
> mean we want to force every arch to i586 (or i686). In the case of
> Athlon, it may actually be a downgrade. Personally, I force mine to
> build for athon in my ~/.rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Walser wrote:
| 1) RPM can't recognize Athlon, it recognizes it as
| i686, so if you have an Athlon you have to
| buildarchtranslate i686 to Athlon, which you can do in
| /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc
Not sure here, or else uname should report different
Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 14:33, Gregory K. Meyer a écrit :
> On Monday 23 September 2002 05:32, Stéphane Teletchéa wrote:
> > I did some recompilation of src rpm (nvidia), and they are still compiled
> > for i586 ...
> >
> > Stef
>
> If you look in your /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc file, you'll see a sect
On Monday 23 September 2002 05:32, Stéphane Teletchéa wrote:
> I did some recompilation of src rpm (nvidia), and they are still compiled
> for i586 ...
>
> Stef
If you look in your /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc file, you'll see a section that looks
like this:
###
Seems my first e-mail fell down a well.
--- Stéphane Teletchéa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rpm -ba -buildarch athlon --sign nvidia.spec
>
>
> Funny
>
> I wonder why it is not DEFAULT ???
There's two issues here:
1) RPM can't recognize Athlon, it recognizes it as
i686, so if you have
Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 13:59, Brook Humphrey a écrit :
> On Monday 23 September 2002 04:46 am, Stéphane Teletchéa wrote:
> > I agree that, but wonder why the rpm is written is /usr/src/RPMS/RPM/i586
> > instead of /usr/src/RPMS/RPM/i686 or /usr/src/RPMS/RPM/athlon ?
> >
> > Stef
>
> rpm -ba -b
On Monday 23 September 2002 04:46 am, Stéphane Teletchéa wrote:
>
> I agree that, but wonder why the rpm is written is /usr/src/RPMS/RPM/i586
> instead of /usr/src/RPMS/RPM/i686 or /usr/src/RPMS/RPM/athlon ?
>
> Stef
rpm -ba -buildarch athlon --sign nvidia.spec
--
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'
--- Stéphane Teletchéa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because you aren't really compiling the driver,
> the driver is in binary
> > form, you only compile the code which glues the
> driver to the kernel..
Correct, the GLX is already compiled, just being
repackaged, and the kernel module ignores y
Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 12:26, gabor farkas a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:32:54AM +0200, Stéphane Teletchéa wrote:
> > I did some recompilation of src rpm (nvidia), and they are still compiled
> > for i586 ...
>
> i'm not an expert on this, but i think that a simple
>
> rpm --rebuild s
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:32:54AM +0200, Stéphane Teletchéa wrote:
> I did some recompilation of src rpm (nvidia), and they are still compiled for
> i586 ...
i'm not an expert on this, but i think that a simple
rpm --rebuild something.src.rpm
isn't enough, you have to tell rpm the target com
Le Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 11:32, vous avez écrit :
> I did some recompilation of src rpm (nvidia), and they are still compiled
> for i586 ...
>
> Stef
May be normal, after all, everything is i586 in Mdk ... ?
Stef (bis)
There's two issues here.
1) RPM still can't recognize athlon, so you have to
buildarchtranslate i686 to athlon.
2) Mandrake still has incorrect buildarchtranslate
lines in /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc and i686 is being
translated to i586 instead of i686.
--- Stéphane Teletchéa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did some recompilation of src rpm (nvidia), and they are still compiled for
i586 ...
Stef
20 matches
Mail list logo
