On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 20:21, M. Ignacio Monge García wrote:
> Have you tried with kernel 2.6?
That seems to have other problems. The new module system etc.
> Ah, BTW, there is a kernel 2.4.22pre7 right now :).
OK the reason I reused 2.4.22-pre6 is because it had compiled
and run before the las
While we're on the topic of cooker kernels, why _do_ we set the kernel
versions switch to ON? The tux.org kernel docs recommend off.
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723
Business Advantage through Community Software - http://teledyn.com
"what I need is
El s?, 19-07-2003 a las 19:06, Dave Cotton escribió:
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 16:56, Buchan Milne wrote:
> http://www.google.com/search?&q=mandrake%20cooker%20gcc-3.3.1%20kernel
> -> http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2003-07/msg01039.php
>
> Try using -Os instead of -O2.
>
> > On Sat, 2
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 16:56, Buchan Milne wrote:
> http://www.google.com/search?&q=mandrake%20cooker%20gcc-3.3.1%20kernel
> -> http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2003-07/msg01039.php
>
> Try using -Os instead of -O2.
>
> > On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 15:04, Han Boetes wrote:
> > > Before you pos
> "B" == Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> http://www.google.com/search?&q=mandrake%20cooker%20gcc-3.3.1%20kernel
You will get far less noise with a site-focussed search query of
site:archives.mandrakelinux.com gcc-3.3.1 kernel
but that query won't explain the cs46xx.c bug
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Dave Cotton wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 15:04, Han Boetes wrote:
> > Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should
> > check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem.
>
> A Google Groups search on the messages I got returned nothing.
>
http
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 15:04, Han Boetes wrote:
> Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should
> check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem.
A Google Groups search on the messages I got returned nothing.
Not many days ago it was said on this list, that if more p
Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should
check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem.
Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trying to compile plain vanilla 2.4.22-pre6 and getting less seg faults
> etc. during the compile, but on boot get the following:-
>
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 12:20, M. Ignacio Monge García wrote:
> Fails with 2.4.22pre7 too.
Whoops behind on my updating of kernels.
> This problem is on Cooker GCC 3.3.1 release 1. Kernel 2.6-test1
> doesn't work too.
Really does any kernel work with 3.3.1?
--
Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
El s?, 19-07-2003 a las 10:50, Dave Cotton escribió:
Trying to compile plain vanilla 2.4.22-pre6 and getting less seg faults
etc. during the compile, but on boot get the following:-
malloc: subst.c: 3656 assertion botched
malloc: block on free list clobbered
INIT:PANIC: segmentation violatio
Trying to compile plain vanilla 2.4.22-pre6 and getting less seg faults
etc. during the compile, but on boot get the following:-
malloc: subst.c: 3656 assertion botched
malloc: block on free list clobbered
INIT:PANIC: segmentation violation at 0x4009ee9a! sleeping 30 seconds
Everything gcc is 3.
11 matches
Mail list logo
