Re: [Cooker] Cooker's version of KDE2 1.92

2000-08-11 Thread David Faure
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, you wrote: >Hello, > >I have never got konqueror to work (well not for ages and ages anyway). I >could tell you what the output is but really I've reported this many times >before. Occassionaly, just for laughs I let the auto crash report tool > report the bug for me, but noth

Re: [Cooker] Cooker's version of KDE2 1.92

2000-08-11 Thread OS
Hello, I have never got konqueror to work (well not for ages and ages anyway). I could tell you what the output is but really I've reported this many times before. Occassionaly, just for laughs I let the auto crash report tool report the bug for me, but nothing seems to change ! I've tried clean

Re: [Cooker] Cooker's version of KDE2 1.92

2000-08-09 Thread Sergio P.Korlowsky
On Wed, 09 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Hi, > > I read that the kde2 from the cooker was more stable and complete > than the official one. > Uh? I was unable to run konqeror, nor kpanel's applets at all... > This version is worst than the official 1.92 at kde. > At least I was able to run konqeror with

[Cooker] Cooker's version of KDE2 1.92

2000-08-09 Thread Serge Lussier
Hi, I read that the kde2 from the cooker was more stable and complete than the official one. Uh? I was unable to run konqeror, nor kpanel's applets at all... This version is worst than the official 1.92 at kde. At least I was able to run konqeror with the "official" version, but the applets wont