Bruno Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
down. Or at least, this is my interpretation of why every time I
upgrade my root-RAID Mandrake-based server, I have to remember to
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/errata.php3#raid
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Bruno Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This was my first guess as well, but the system still wouldn't
come up after I built my own initrd with raid1 and raid5 support.
I added aliases for md-personality-3 and md-personality-4 to
/etc/modules.conf, but no luck. Every array would still fail to
From: Bruno Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP
and
two 40G
7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
onboard promise controller.
Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as follows:
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 22:43, Bruno Prior wrote:
Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP and
two 40G
7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
onboard promise controller.
Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as follows:
From: Wes Kurdziolek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 22:43, Bruno Prior wrote:
Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP
and
two 40G
7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
onboard promise controller.
Booted
Thomas Backlund wrote:
Funny, I have no problem what so ever with the soft raid, and I have 3
systems
set up this way, 2 with scsi disks, and one with ide disks...
my setup: RAID -1
/dev/md0 - /boot (sda1,sdb1 or hda1,hdc1)
/dev/md1 - / (sda6,sdb6 or hda6,hdc6)
Wes Kurdziolek wrote:
When I did an MDK 9.0 install that resembled this (ext3 /boot, RAID-0 /,
/usr, /usr/local, /var/, and /tmp -- yes, performance is critical), the
system failed to come up after rebooting b/c the raid0 module was not
included in the initrd and/or not loaded by the
That's not very helpful if the damn thing won't come up even in single
user mode. ;) I could use the rescue mode from the CD, but I'd rather
everything work right w/o having to do that.
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 04:15, Thomas Backlund wrote:
From: Wes Kurdziolek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun,
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 05:46, Bruno Prior wrote:
This was my first guess as well, but the system still wouldn't come up
after I built my own initrd with raid1 and raid5 support. I added
aliases for md-personality-3 and md-personality-4 to /etc/modules.conf,
but no luck. Every array would
Bruno Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
One thought. Was yours a completely fresh install? Mine was an install over
the top of 9.0 RC1, and I was trying in the first instance to retain the old
arrays. The errata indicates that this is what goes wrong - diskdrake
identifies the old
Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP and
two 40G
7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
onboard promise controller.
Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as follows:
/dev/hda1256M-/boot [ext2]
/dev/hda2
I've just spent a happy morning installing a machine. I wanted so see if
all would go well with old kit. The machine is an HP NetServer 5/100 LC.
with 133 Pentium, 96 Mb RAM, one 1.05 Gb and three 2.1 Gb SCSI discs,
floppy but no CD. Using an NFS install with sda1 as boot sda2 as swap
and all the
Linux Autrement [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
done folks at Mandrake. But why is it not shouted load and clear that
Mandrake since at least 8.2 can install straight onto a RAID?
Before 9.0, detecting current RAID was not supported so it was
not so good. Now it's even better, yep.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Linux Autrement [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
done folks at Mandrake. But why is it not shouted load and clear that
Mandrake since at least 8.2 can install straight onto a RAID?
Before 9.0, detecting current RAID was not supported so it was
not so good.
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 12:32 PM, Stephen Pickering wrote:
Before 9.0, detecting current RAID was not supported so it was
not so good. Now it's even better, yep.
Any tips on how to install using raid ?
I tried this morning with no sucess, so I went back to non raid.
Have you
Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP and
two 40G
7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the
onboard promise controller.
Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as follows:
/dev/hda1256M-/boot [ext2]
/dev/hda224G
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please take the Reply-To: out of your e-mail client,
it is screwing things up.
Talking about that, please CUT the unnecessary parts of the
messages you answer to.. thanks!
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
On Monday 29 July 2002 07:19 am, Pixel wrote:
David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. When booting from a floppy (nfs install), the Advanced screen (F2)
has a spelling error:
secutiry=n should be seceurity-n
fixed
I thought is was 'security' (no second 'e')
V.
On Monday 29 July 2002 10:52 pm, you wrote:
On Monday 29 July 2002 07:19 am, Pixel wrote:
David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. When booting from a floppy (nfs install), the Advanced screen (F2)
has a spelling error:
secutiry=n should be seceurity-n
fixed
I thought
David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. When booting from a floppy (nfs install), the Advanced screen (F2) has a
spelling error:
secutiry=n should be seceurity-n
fixed
Noticed a few things,
1. When booting from a floppy (nfs install), the Advanced screen (F2) has a
spelling error:
secutiry=n should be seceurity-n
2. GUI install; while formatting partitions, the information box is blank
until the end when flashes up the last partion formatted, then
Even I can not spell correctly, a.
On Saturday 27 July 2002 10:53 am, David Eastcott wrote:
Noticed a few things,
1. When booting from a floppy (nfs install), the Advanced screen (F2) has
a spelling error:
secutiry=n should be seceurity-n
should be security=n
Dave
On Saturday 27 July 2002 18:53, David Eastcott wrote:
4. On the main diag log for Printer Installation:
a) the text: ...available for Star Office/OpenOffice.org should may
be?? have the .org removed??
As far as I know OpenOffice.org is the official name for the offcie suite
so .org must be
On Saturday 27 July 2002 11:12 am, David Walser wrote:
--- David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
6. When the option Clean tmp is selected in the
Bootloader dialog, an fstab
entry gets created which mounts the tmpfs as /tmp.
Is there a reason for
this?
Why object to this?
Please take the Reply-To: out of your e-mail client,
it is screwing things up.
--- David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2002 11:12 am, David Walser
wrote:
--- David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
6. When the option Clean tmp is selected in the
On Saturday 27 July 2002 11:31 am, you wrote:
David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
5. Old whine - what are the chances of having the selected services
dumped to the auto_inst.cfg file?
i'll try to do it.
Thanks
Dave
26 matches
Mail list logo
