Luca Berra ha scritto:
if the virus is a spoofing virus you have no way of identifying the
sender mail address, unless you force the sender to authenticate before
sending a message.
well, smpt auth could be and idea for this purpose, but postfix indeed would knows
the real client sender IP.
Luca Berra ha scritto:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:39:41PM +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~ghibo/amavisd-new-0.20030616-1mdk.src.rpm
:!wget ...
But, before posting to contrib, I'm currently trying to find how to
modify amavisd.conf so that:
- local recipient
Levi Ramsey ha scritto:
On Thu Jul 03 13:39 +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
- let spam pass to users (but with X-Spam-Status) and at the same time
collect
all the recognized spam to a repository for further bayes learning.
Collecting SA mails to a bayesian system is beyond stupid, as far as I
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
$viruses_that_fake_sender_re = new_RE(
qr'nimda|hybris|klez|bugbear|yaha|braid|sobig|palyh|inor|fizzer'i );
.
this is used also to alter virus report, the user gets a report
stating she received a virus from an unknown source, vs. a real mail
address.
which
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
Luca Berra ha scritto:
i'd also like for the rpm to provide a modified master.cf with all
goodies described in README.postfix (the part below the ascii art
diagram i mean)
You are right, but indeed, I was thiking to something different. Instead
of a
awkward %post
Luca Berra ha scritto:
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
Luca Berra ha scritto:
i'd also like for the rpm to provide a modified master.cf with all
goodies described in README.postfix (the part below the ascii art
diagram i mean)
You are right, but indeed, I was thiking to something different. Instead
of a
Luca Berra ha scritto:
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
$viruses_that_fake_sender_re = new_RE(
qr'nimda|hybris|klez|bugbear|yaha|braid|sobig|palyh|inor|fizzer'i );
.
this is used also to alter virus report, the user gets a report
stating she received a virus from an unknown source, vs. a real mail
Bret Baptist ha scritto:
The above information was not correct, from the amavisd.conf:
# Here is an overall picture (sequence of events) of how pieces fit together
# (only virus controls are shown, spam controls work the same way):
#
# bypass_virus_checks? == PASS
# no viruses? == PASS
#
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
For the spoofed viruses a map can be set up to not warn at all:
Yes, but the sending user of the LAN won't know he has taken a virus...
if the virus is a spoofing virus you have no way of identifying the
sender mail address, unless you force the sender to authenticate
So you have to start a process for every single massage. That is wat
I want to avoid. It is no problem while you are receiving only few
messages per hour. But else, the overhead is to much. A daemon
talking smtp is prefered (and that is waht amavisd-new does).
But, IIRC, amavis forks a new
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 05:59, magic wrote:
I would like to second the use of amavisd-new. I use it for our mailserver
and it is awesome. We do about 100,000 messages a day, not that high volume,
but enough. I have never had a problem with amavisd-new.
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 08:18 schrieb Michael Scherer:
So you have to start a process for every single massage. That is wat
I want to avoid. It is no problem while you are receiving only few
messages per hour. But else, the overhead is to much. A daemon
talking smtp is prefered (and
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 08:18 schrieb Michael Scherer:
So you have to start a process for every single massage. That is wat
I want to avoid. It is no problem while you are receiving only few
messages per hour. But else, the overhead is to much. A daemon
talking
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 13:39 schrieb Giuseppe Ghibò:
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 08:18 schrieb Michael Scherer:
So you have to start a process for every single massage. That is wat
I want to avoid. It is no problem while you are receiving only few
messages
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 10:59 pm, magic wrote:
magic wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
I would like to second the use of amavisd-new. I use it for our
mailserver and it is awesome. We do about 100,000 messages a day, not
that high volume, but enough. I have never had a
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 13:39 schrieb Giuseppe Ghibò:
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 08:18 schrieb Michael Scherer:
So you have to start a process for every single massage. That is wat
I want to avoid. It is no problem while you are
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 10:59 pm, magic wrote:
magic wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
I would like to second the use of amavisd-new. I use it for our
mailserver and it is awesome. We do about 100,000 messages a day, not
that high volume, but enough. I have never had a
Buchan Milne wrote:
I don't have much time to look at all of this, so if you can get
something together it would help. Something like that can be added quite
easily late in the dev cycle, but we can't wait much longer to switch to
openldap-2.1.x and dumping sasl2, so I will spend what time I have
On Thursday 03 July 2003 9:47 am, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 13:39 schrieb Giuseppe Ghibò:
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 08:18 schrieb Michael Scherer:
So you have to start a process for every single massage.
On Thursday 03 July 2003 9:47 am, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 13:39 schrieb Giuseppe Ghibò:
Martin Fahrendorf ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 08:18 schrieb Michael Scherer:
So you have to start a process for every single massage.
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 09:25:25AM +0200, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 08:18 schrieb Michael Scherer:
So you have to start a process for every single massage. That is wat
I want to avoid. It is no problem while you are receiving only few
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:39:41PM +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~ghibo/amavisd-new-0.20030616-1mdk.src.rpm
:!wget ...
But, before posting to contrib, I'm currently trying to find how to modify
amavisd.conf so that:
- local recipient users is warned about
On Thu Jul 03 13:39 +0200, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
- let spam pass to users (but with X-Spam-Status) and at the same time
collect
all the recognized spam to a repository for further bayes learning.
Collecting SA mails to a bayesian system is beyond stupid, as far as I
can tell. You go through
[snip]
Isn't it just easyer to use amavisd-new? You don't need to start a
bunch of programms for every mail and you can use a virus scanner too.
AFAIC amavisd-new is not in mdk (only amavis-ng, which does not run as
a daemon). Put it is a simple perl script.
I would preffer MailScanner. I
Kim Schulz wrote:
[snip]
Isn't it just easyer to use amavisd-new? You don't need to start a
bunch of programms for every mail and you can use a virus scanner too.
AFAIC amavisd-new is not in mdk (only amavis-ng, which does not run as
a daemon). Put it is a simple perl script.
I would preffer
Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
tarballs for SpamAssasin and MailScanner and set them up together as
shown in the mailscanner site.
But for a distribution intended for general consumer use, it would be
great if the default install had a spam filter installed by default as
most people will want one but
Am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2003 14:33 schrieb magic:
...
Actually, spamassassin as setup runs as a deamon (spamd), and hooks
into Postfix as a filter.
So how do you feed the mails from postfix into spamd and how does spamd
handles the mail back to postfix?
Thanks,
S
Martin
--
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 14:33, magic wrote:
Actually, spamassassin as setup runs as a deamon (spamd), and hooks
into Postfix as a filter.
At the moment the config here is:
postfix + spamd + amavis-new as daemon + sophie as a daemon.
running on an 850 AMD Duron with 256 Mb.
It seemed to
Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Actually, spamassassin as setup runs as a deamon (spamd), and hooks
into Postfix as a filter.
So how do you feed the mails from postfix into spamd and how does spamd
handles the mail back to postfix?
I am not going to pretend I understand everything, but he's
magic wrote:
Isn't it just easyer to use amavisd-new? You don't need to start a
bunch of programms for every mail and you can use a virus scanner too.
Actually, spamassassin as setup runs as a deamon (spamd), and hooks
into Postfix as a filter.
no, it does not.
spamassassin runs as a
Ainsi parlait Martin Fahrendorf :
Am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2003 14:33 schrieb magic:
...
Actually, spamassassin as setup runs as a deamon (spamd), and hooks
into Postfix as a filter.
So how do you feed the mails from postfix into spamd and how does spamd
handles the mail back to postfix?
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Through a global procmail rule:
:0fw
* 256000
| spamc
And there is no need to feed the message back to postfix, as it is delivered
immediatly. This concerns only incoming message.
procmail is a very limited solution, it does have difficulties in
dealing with maildirs,
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 12:02 am, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Isn't it just easyer to use amavisd-new? You don't need to start a bunch of
programms for every mail and you can use a virus scanner too.
AFAIC amavisd-new is not in mdk (only amavis-ng, which does not run as a
daemon). Put it is a
Bret Baptist wrote:
AFAIC amavisd-new is not in mdk (only amavis-ng, which does not run as a
daemon). Put it is a simple perl script.
Martin
I would like to second the use of amavisd-new. I use it for our mailserver
and it is awesome. We do about 100,000 messages a day,
magic wrote:
Bret Baptist wrote:
AFAIC amavisd-new is not in mdk (only amavis-ng, which does not run as a
daemon). Put it is a simple perl script.
Martin
I would like to second the use of amavisd-new. I use it for our mailserver
and it is awesome. We do
Am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2003 16:13 schrieb magic:
Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Actually, spamassassin as setup runs as a deamon (spamd), and hooks
into Postfix as a filter.
So how do you feed the mails from postfix into spamd and how does spamd
handles the mail back to postfix?
I am not going
Am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2003 17:26 schrieb Guillaume Rousse:
Ainsi parlait Martin Fahrendorf :
Am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2003 14:33 schrieb magic:
...
Actually, spamassassin as setup runs as a deamon (spamd), and hooks
into Postfix as a filter.
So how do you feed the mails from postfix
Hello all,
I haven't seen anything recent about Postfix, Openldap, db41,
cyrus-imapd sasl2 getting into the Cooker.
Was just wondering if anyone is working on this, and what the status is.
(Also I think it would be great if cyrus-imapd was moved from contrib to
main.)
Thanks!
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
magic wrote:
Hello all,
I haven't seen anything recent about Postfix, Openldap, db41,
cyrus-imapd sasl2 getting into the Cooker.
Was just wondering if anyone is working on this, and what the status is.
(Also I think it would be great if
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 08:32, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
magic wrote:
Hello all,
I haven't seen anything recent about Postfix, Openldap, db41,
cyrus-imapd sasl2 getting into the Cooker.
Was just wondering if anyone is working on this, and
Buchan Milne wrote:
db4.1 got slipped in last week (didn't appear in my changelog mailbox
...) and postfix is rebuilt against it.
We now need sasl2 built against db4.1, then openldap-2.1, then sasl2
again. Then we just (;-)) need to ensure everything works.
I will try and update my openldap-2.1.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
magic wrote:
I missed the db41 going into cooker. Did you upgrade db4, or install
41 maintain both libs on your system (I heard the latter is not a good
thing to do, eventhough it works.)
I would be glad to help! Are the rpms available on
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 09:30, Clive Dove wrote:
I was thinking of adding configuration for it,
From the looks of it I think that I will find it easier to download the
tarballs for SpamAssasin and MailScanner and set them up together as
shown in the mailscanner site.
But for a distribution
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 05:32, Buchan Milne wrote:
db4.1 got slipped in last week (didn't appear in my changelog mailbox
...) and postfix is rebuilt against it.
We now need sasl2 built against db4.1, then openldap-2.1, then sasl2
again. Then we just (;-)) need to ensure everything works.
I
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 09:56, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clive Dove wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 08:32, Buchan Milne wrote:
While looking at mailservers, how about looking at including
spamassassin?
Spamassassin is in main. Do you mean adding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 05:32, Buchan Milne wrote:
Did you have any fun with blackhole if not i can look at it myself.
I don't have much time to look at all of this, so if you can get
something together it would help.
Clive Dove wrote:
I was thinking of adding configuration for it,
From the looks of it I think that I will find it easier to download the
tarballs for SpamAssasin and MailScanner and set them up together as
shown in the mailscanner site.
But for a distribution intended for general consumer
Am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2003 05:48 schrieb magic:
Clive Dove wrote:
I was thinking of adding configuration for it,
From the looks of it I think that I will find it easier to download the
tarballs for SpamAssasin and MailScanner and set them up together as
shown in the mailscanner site.
But
48 matches
Mail list logo
