[Cooker] NEW INSTALL IMAGES FOR MDK 9.1...

2003-04-04 Thread Thomas Backlund
Sorry for the delays, but my DSL is broken, so I've been dooing most of my downloading over my GPRS phone... (thank god it's fixed montly fee ,-)... already over 70MB in just a couple of days) Here is a copy of what I have at: http://www.iki.fi/tmb/Cooker/ (with some added contents...) MDK

Fwd: Re: [Cooker] new install floppies, more modules dropped

2003-02-03 Thread David Eastcott
Did not see this get through the first time. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [Cooker] new install floppies, more modules dropped Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 09:40:53 -0700 From: David Eastcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thursday 30 January 2003 15:11, Pixel

Re: [Cooker] new install floppies, more modules dropped

2003-02-02 Thread David Eastcott
On Thursday 30 January 2003 15:11, Pixel wrote: ... - good news: many gigabit drivers are now available - bad news: the following modules are not available on install floppies disk/scsi: NCR53c406a aha152x psi240i qlogicfas qlogicfc wd7000 sim710 t128 ultrastor 53c7,8xx dc395x_trm

[Cooker] new install floppies, more modules dropped

2003-01-30 Thread Pixel
DrakX will at last switch to new kernel-BOOT. Alas, ACPI is big, but is going to be needed more and more in the future. The result is a kernel ~100KB bigger, and fitting on floppy even harder than before. Hopefully install floppies are no more as important as they used to be (because of isolinux

[Cooker] New install - useless.

2002-02-26 Thread guran
Hi Version:(rsync ftp.sunet.se) Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020226 0:20 /ChangeLog/1.661/Sun Feb 24 15:49:13 2002// This is a fresh install. I don't know what is causing this but it is shamelessly slow and it takes for ever to get the passwd accepted when attempting to go into su

[Cooker] Cooker new install

2001-10-18 Thread Robin Cook
So far for the past three days I have tried to do a new cooker install but have been unable to do so because I keep getting the error when it goes to get the package list. deplist.ordered mismatch with hdlist.

Re: [Cooker] Cooker new install

2001-10-18 Thread François Pons
Robin Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So far for the past three days I have tried to do a new cooker install but have been unable to do so because I keep getting the error when it goes to get the package list. deplist.ordered mismatch with hdlist. You can try to build it by yourself (if

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-22 Thread James Ray Kenney
Date sent: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:03:21 +0200 From: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Borsenkow

RE: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Michael Bollozos
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Borsenkow Andrej Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems Where have you found these 99% of people? Obviously, of all

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Radek Vybiral
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote: True, it might not be, however why should I loose features because I choose to do this? I log in as root because I am often installing, fiddling, testing, etc with things that most user shouldn't - at the same time I'm getting my user work -

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 10:51, Radek Vybiral scribit : I solve this bad things: Copy ~/Desktop and ~/.kde/config from normal user to /root NO. the best way is to not log as root ! Why MDK hates logging as root in KDE? The warning at the begining should be enough. Yes. Red background

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Radek Vybiral
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: No as you log as root and don't understand why it is dangerous. there's also su and sudo + open a term + []$ su - give the root password make what you want, and you can launch what you want. reduce the term or put it for example in the third

RE: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
Where have you found these 99% of people? Obviously, of all posting in this thread just two people have seen it - one of them developer. So, speaking about *users* the score is currently 100% against it :-) Well, here at Mandrake we sure do tweaking of system all day long, and no one

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread andre
On do, 2001-09-20 at 04:28, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 04:21, Sergio P.Korlowsky a écrit : Well... if it goes to votes, I vote to leave it as it is now, and I haven't seen it yet so do I, but I'm going to test RC 1 so I will see it maybe. it is true, you a

RE: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Radek Vybiral
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: Where have you found these 99% of people? Obviously, of all posting in this thread just two people have seen it - one of them developer. So, speaking about *users* the score is currently 100% against it :-) Well, here at Mandrake we

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Tom Badran
superuser aka root su for superuser with su you don't become an other user. You mainly change uid and gid. Almost nothing else but su username changes you to any user on the sytem, hence the command is abbreviated switch user, and not super user -- Tom Tomahawk Badran Department of

RE: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Yura Gusev
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michael Bollozos wrote: Im a Mandrake user(newbie), and I would like to log-in as root in my Box, but with the current 8.1's new behavior I think I would just stick to 8.0 coz i normally log-in as root in my box this box is not plugged in the network BTW... I have

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-20 Thread Yura Gusev
On 20 Sep 2001, andre wrote: su = switch user su - or su - root for root su - user to log as a user superuser aka root su for superuser with su you don't become an other user. You mainly change uid and gid. Almost nothing else Nah. Also all env variables. su -, but with su yes

[Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
Just did new install, Configuration, Console, Gnome, KDE groups selected, ni manual package selection, Russian locale KOI8-R. First time login, startx. 1. Background has nasty and distasteful dark red color (blood color is probably right term). When wizard starts background is changed to usual

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
Le Mercredi 19 Septembre 2001 15:39, David BAUDENS scribit : On Wednesday 19 September 2001 10:19, you wrote: 1. Background has nasty and distasteful dark red color (blood color is probably right term). When wizard starts background is changed to usual blue. I cancelled Wizard and KDE came

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 03:25, Vincent Meyer scribit : Maybe so - but I hate it. I spend half of my time logged in as root because I WANT to be logged in as root. why do YOU want to do that ? don't do it ! You don't NEED to log as root in KDE, and what YOU want may not be the best.

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Vincent Meyer
True, it might not be, however why should I loose features because I choose to do this? I log in as root because I am often installing, fiddling, testing, etc with things that most user shouldn't - at the same time I'm getting my user work - e-mail, word processing, etc done. I DON't want to

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Tom Badran
NO! Just because I don't choose to use what you consider are safe or good practices shouldn't force me to go back to Windows!!! Plenty of people logging into KDE as root isn't the same as plenty of developers logging into KDE as root. If you feel that you can use it safely enough, then

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 04:11, Tom Badran scribit : If you feel that you can use it safely enough, then surely you must have the abililty to change/enable any of the features you want, why should mandrake be changed for 1 person, when 99% of people want it the way it is, or dont know

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Sergio P.Korlowsky
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 20:33, you wrote: Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 03:25, Vincent Meyer scribit : Maybe so - but I hate it. I spend half of my time logged in as root because I WANT to be logged in as root. why do YOU want to do that ? don't do it ! You don't NEED to log as root

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 04:21, Sergio P.Korlowsky a écrit : Well... if it goes to votes, I vote to leave it as it is now, and I haven't seen it yet so do I, but I'm going to test RC 1 so I will see it maybe. it is true, you a see lot of people logged in as root, unreal! unreal is the

RE: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 10:19, you wrote: Just did new install, Configuration, Console, Gnome, KDE groups selected, ni manual package selection, Russian locale KOI8-R. First time login, startx. 1. Background has nasty and distasteful dark red color (blood color is probably

Re: [Cooker] new install - background/desktop problems

2001-09-19 Thread J.P.Pasnak
On September 19, 2001 23:20 pm, you wrote: NO! Just because I don't choose to use what you consider are safe or good practices shouldn't force me to go back to Windows!!! Plenty of people logging into KDE as root isn't the same as plenty of developers logging into KDE as root.

Re: [Cooker] New install - first boot hangs on Starting Devfs

2001-08-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Blue Lizard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I let it sit, got breakfast, took shower, read book, played ball, and it still not finished (slow machine). I decided to go with devfs=nomount. edit /etc/devfsd.conf and remove the line that talk about /sbin/pam_console_apply

Re: [Cooker] New install - first boot hangs on Starting Devfs

2001-08-22 Thread Blue Lizard
On 22 Aug 2001 10:43:08 +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Blue Lizard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I let it sit, got breakfast, took shower, read book, played ball, and it still not finished (slow machine). I decided to go with devfs=nomount. edit /etc/devfsd.conf and remove the line that

RE: [Cooker] New install - first boot hangs on Starting Devfs

2001-08-21 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
Synced two hours ago, almost default install, root on reiser, first boot - system hangs on starting DevFs. Install yesterday was still O.K. :-) The only difference I use chained lilo loader from the first install, on test installation (hda5) lilo is installed on partinion. O.K. it's

RE: [Cooker] New install - first boot hangs on Starting Devfs

2001-08-21 Thread Blue Lizard
I let it sit, got breakfast, took shower, read book, played ball, and it still not finished (slow machine). I decided to go with devfs=nomount.

Re: [Cooker] new install

2001-04-05 Thread Frederic Crozat
Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Rajesh Veerappan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : Installing nautilus-trilobite will fix the eazel services problem. I'm going to fix nautilus to no longer display Eazel service icon if nautilus-trilobite is not installed.. -- Frdric Crozat MandrakeSoft

Re: [Cooker] new install

2001-04-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"joabb2" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Great install, photo's broke up boredom of waiting wished for names attached. was posted once on this ML and on the Forum. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] new install

2001-04-05 Thread joabb2
Thanks, Found it. a cable installer knocked me off for 30hrs :-/ just catching up. JoAnne - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Veerappan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] new install Installing nautilus

Re: [Cooker] new install

2001-04-04 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 07:49, joabb2 wrote: | BTW I still use win/Gozilla for d/ld. get 500-600k/bps. | cant get more than 292k/bps with Linux :(( | (yes traceroute and ping are about same) | Do you use Netscape/Mozilla inder Linux? Try Konqueror. I am on dialup, and transfer rate (on

Re: [Cooker] new install

2001-04-04 Thread joabb2
4, 2001 12:03 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] new install On Tuesday 03 April 2001 07:49, joabb2 wrote: | BTW I still use win/Gozilla for d/ld. get 500-600k/bps. | cant get more than 292k/bps with Linux :(( | (yes traceroute and ping are about same) | Do you use Netscape/Mozilla inder L

Re: [Cooker] new install

2001-04-04 Thread Rajesh Veerappan
- Original Message - From: "Vadim Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:03 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] new install On Tuesday 03 April 2001 07:49, joabb2 wrote: | BTW I still use win/Gozilla for d/ld. get 500-600k/bps. | cant get

[Cooker] new install

2001-04-03 Thread joabb2
Hi All Just installed LM8.0 from cd's d/lded from wtfo.com. system MSI61198 pll 350, 128 ram, 2 Fujitsu 8g hd's,1 generic cd-rom, 1 generic cd-r/w. Installed clean on ide1 from booting cd. Install found 3 cd-roms, 3 RealTek nic's (have 1). found eth0 said was configured. would not find net at

[Cooker] new install as of about 5 hours ago

2001-03-20 Thread Brook Humphrey
For some resaon only the 8.0 beta 1 will install on my system. The only real problem that I have is that the video cards are not proerly set up. I have not tried beta2 but I have been making my wn cd's using the mkcds script. Last night it was so bad that when i tested with fxfree4 the video

[Cooker] new install problems

2000-10-21 Thread Greg Sarsons
Did a rsync of mirror this am and did a reinstall to see how things were progress. Unfortunately the install was not a good as previous. the install was expert, development, everything -previously as a user I could not launch DrakConf and get into privilaged, after password nothing

[Cooker] New Install...

2000-09-22 Thread allx
Just downloaded latest updates... :- Now stage2 works, can find HDA,HDB... but something happens and a new error is here :))) shmget failed! at /usr/bin/perl_install/install_gtk.pm line 24 Tried with reiserfs as "/" My partitions: hda1 fat16 5Mb hda2 linux swap hda3 reiserfs 9Gb as "/"

Re: [Cooker] New Install...

2000-09-22 Thread Pixel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now stage2 works, can find HDA,HDB... but something happens and a new error is here :))) can you mail me the report.bug? to get it: switch to console 2 put a fat floppy in floppy drive and type "bug" - it will put report.bug on floppy and this file interests me

Re: [Cooker] new install

2000-04-24 Thread Pixel
Brook humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks pixel actually what I've had to do so far is boot up with my linux rescue disk. Start fdisk delete all the partitions and then guess at were they were before. Anyway I got enough of it that I can mount part of the root partition and the

Re: [Cooker] new install

2000-04-24 Thread Brook humphrey
Thanks my /home and ftp/pub partitions made it ok but root and swap are bad. At lest none of the important stuff is gone and I made copies a long time ago of things like rc.masq and samba.conf to my /home dir so all should be ok. Pixel wrote: Brook humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: [Cooker] new install

2000-04-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Christopher Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hey, on a different note, what do you do if you , very dumbly, delete your lilo.conf file? i don't this there is a way. Any way to retreve from lilo? do you mean the lilo.conf file ? -- MandrakeSoft Inc

Re: [Cooker] new install

2000-04-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Christopher Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, I mean I deleted the lilo.conf file on my server (accidently, you'd laugh to hard if I told you what I did) and didn't have a backup. (Hell, I had created a new server from another machine and copied all of /etc/*.conf from my origional

Re: [Cooker] new install

2000-04-24 Thread Pixel
Christopher Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, I mean I deleted the lilo.conf file on my server (accidently, you'd laugh to hard if I told you what I did) and didn't have a backup. no way to recover it from the mbr. you have to reconfig it. maybe drakboot can help!

Re: [Cooker] new install

2000-04-24 Thread Robert L Martin
i think by definition the dev kernel is not going to be in a distro install. closest you can get is maybe the hackkernel. but doing the dev kernel from a source download isn't to bad route is 1 install the distros kernel source rpm (for RH or L-M type distros) when you fix the deps you get the

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Pixel
Scott Haug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 09:59:09PM -0500, Heath Doane wrote: Greetings, 3) "Normal" user is unable to run X successfully. Root has no problems, but when a regular user starts X, the server loads, the screen goes blue with an "X" cursor, but the

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Pixel
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Scott Haug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 09:59:09PM -0500, Heath Doane wrote: Greetings, 3) "Normal" user is unable to run X successfully. Root has no problems, but when a regular user starts X, the server loads, the screen

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Pixel
Heath Doane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 04:15 AM 1/2/00 +0100, you wrote: Heath Doane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1) When Installing, if it detects existing Linux partitions, it would not let me create new/more. diskdrake or lilo ? That would be in Diskdrake. I chose the "Custom"

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Pixel
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I had this problem when I installed a fresh oxygen while retaining my previous /home partition. I created new users using the same name as the previous users (thus reusing the old user's dirs), but the install gave them new uid's. So when I tried

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Wayne Gabler
I'm new but... did you delete the partitions allready there first because when i installed i could change almost at will..strange about the 245m swap file though Heath Doane wrote: At 04:15 AM 1/2/00 +0100, you wrote: Heath Doane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1) When Installing, if it

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Sanjay Sheth
At 10:03 AM 1/2/00 , you wrote: I'm new but... did you delete the partitions allready there first because when i installed i could change almost at will..strange about the 245m swap file though How about adjusting the code to set the max. auto-selected swap file size to amount of physical

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Pixel
Sanjay Sheth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 10:03 AM 1/2/00 , you wrote: I'm new but... did you delete the partitions allready there first because when i installed i could change almost at will..strange about the 245m swap file though How about adjusting the code to set the max.

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread stephen
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Axalon Bloodstone wrote: Let me clarify i guess. I wouldn't have less than 128megs. 386 or 1gig of real ram. At current prices 254 megs of hd cost like 2$us. I personaly can't recommend any less than 128 with todays uses. not unfortunately in the UK, 110 for 15Gb or is

Re: [Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-02 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, stephen wrote: On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Axalon Bloodstone wrote: Let me clarify i guess. I wouldn't have less than 128megs. 386 or 1gig of real ram. At current prices 254 megs of hd cost like 2$us. I personaly can't recommend any less than 128 with todays uses. not

[Cooker] New Install of Oxygen - Few things....

2000-01-01 Thread Heath Doane
Greetings, I just installed Oxygen 7.2 (iso dated 99.12.24) on my PC, as a fresh install. Noticed the following point: (Sorry if they've been covered before, I've just joined the listserv) 1) When Installing, if it detects existing Linux partitions, it would not let me create new/more.

Re: [Cooker] new install

1999-11-29 Thread webmedic
It was trying to use my modem for the network. I think. I set up the modem during install. Pixel wrote: root [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] 3) The modem install didn't work quite so nice this time and the crypto packages could not be downloaded during install. I just created an

Re: [Cooker] new install

1999-11-29 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
Well most of the same ;-) It also got stucked at cryptografic, "choose a mirror from which to get packages from... and the same, it couldn't find the modem... which it did before, if I hit -cancel- skips the option to go to the next, but after setting the time, it comes back to the same

Re: [Cooker] new install

1999-11-15 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
webmedic wrote: Its looking real good. I did an install from cdrom. it boots up with kdm now instead of gdm but maybe thats because I opted not to install gnome although it is still their using icewm as the windowmanager. Kfm segfaults if I try to go to the linux mandrake website. Even if

[Cooker] new install

1999-11-14 Thread webmedic
Its looking real good. I did an install from cdrom. it boots up with kdm now instead of gdm but maybe thats because I opted not to install gnome although it is still their using icewm as the windowmanager. Kfm segfaults if I try to go to the linux mandrake website. Even if i use the News link