From: "Ivan Tefalco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I've tried Thomas's fixes on a number of occasions., - the floppy image
> > allows installation., but post install, - still get Kernel panic.
(Unable to
> > edit lilo.conf once installation is complete).
> >
What editing ??
If you have followed my instr
st it in latest cooker to confirm it works.
Many thanks
-Ivan.
-Original Message-
From: Buchan Milne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2003 11:14
To: Ivan Tefalco
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Tefalco wrote:
> I've tried Thomas's fixes on a number of occasions., - the floppy image
> allows installation., but post install, - still get Kernel panic.
(Unable to
> edit lilo.conf once installation is complete).
>
Did you run the steps that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Tefalco wrote:
> People with the affected hardware posted regularly on this issue on
> Cooker..specifying the problems encountered, workarounds, and areas where
> the hardware would fail to detect under any circumstances. Your
comment that
> peopl
imply looking for an update on this issue, not a smackdown. :)
-Original Message-
From: Buchan Milne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 June 2003 00:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Promise PDC 20276
> Would it be possible for someone to confirm the s
Bruno Prior wrote:
If the PDC20276 is your secondary IDE controller, do an install to a
disk on you primary controller with the PDC20276 disabled in BIOS (may
not be necessary). Recompile the kernel with CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE=y.
Once you can boot with a kernel compiled with this option, you will
If the PDC20276 is your secondary IDE controller, do an install to a
disk on you primary controller with the PDC20276 disabled in BIOS (may
not be necessary). Recompile the kernel with CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE=y.
Once you can boot with a kernel compiled with this option, you will be
able to enable
On September 1993 plus 3580 days Buchan Milne wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible for someone to confirm the status of ATA support on
>> the Promise PDC202xx chipsets currently found on a wide range of ASUS
>> and Gigabyte motherboards.
>>
>> LM9.0 - no issues, PDC20276 ATA function picked up, drive
> Would it be possible for someone to confirm the status of ATA support on
> the Promise PDC202xx chipsets currently found on a wide range of ASUS
> and Gigabyte motherboards.
>
> LM9.0 - no issues, PDC20276 ATA function picked up, drives recognised.
>
> LM9.1 - PDC202xx support broken, no drives
On September 1993 plus 3580 days Ivan Tefalco wrote:
> Would it be possible for someone to confirm the status of ATA support on the
> Promise PDC202xx chipsets currently found on a wide range of ASUS and
> Gigabyte motherboards.
>
> LM9.0 - no issues, PDC20276 ATA function picked up, drives recogn
Would it be possible for someone to confirm the status of ATA support on the
Promise PDC202xx chipsets currently found on a wide range of ASUS and
Gigabyte motherboards.
LM9.0 - no issues, PDC20276 ATA function picked up, drives recognised.
LM9.1 - PDC202xx support broken, no drives recognised o
11 matches
Mail list logo