RE: [Cooker] QA - About problem tracking

2000-09-29 Thread Don Head
>> Estimated opening date for cooker geeks : Next week. >> Note that the system opening will _not_ be widely >> advertized for now, the time >> for us to make sure it is working, handling the >> load. Also the time for us to >> fix the bugs that will be discovered during the >> first times ;-) >

Re: [Cooker] QA - About problem tracking

2000-09-29 Thread Eugenio Diaz
--- Jerome Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On reply to Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Another thing I would like to see from Mandrake > is a "**real** database > > > driven web-based public bugtraking system" like > bugzilla or

Re: [Cooker] QA - About problem tracking

2000-09-29 Thread Matthew P. Barnson
As a Bugzilla maintainer, I need to ask: 1. Will you be returning the code changes back to mozilla.org? If possible, as patches diff'ed against current CVS would be great. 2. If the answer to question #1 is "no", I'll gladly take your hacks and see if they are applicable to Bugzilla 2.12...

Re: [Cooker] QA - About problem tracking

2000-09-29 Thread Jerome Martin
"Matthew P. Barnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As a Bugzilla maintainer, I need to ask: > 1. Will you be returning the code changes back to mozilla.org? If possible, > as patches diff'ed against current CVS would be great. I doubt those patches are usefull for main code, they are very spe

[Cooker] QA - About problem tracking

2000-09-27 Thread Jerome Martin
On reply to Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Another thing I would like to see from Mandrake is a "**real** database > > driven web-based public bugtraking system" like bugzilla or Double > > Chocolate. Actually this was my first suggestion