Re: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-23 Thread =/\\= Majki =/\\=
Since, AFAICT, dependencies are always installed, and the only difference the button makes is whether or not they are shown as selected in the package selection list, how about: "Show automatically-selected packages" I like it

RE: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-22 Thread Aaron Cohen
How about: "Silently select dependencies." ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 6:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree the checkbox "Automatic depe

Re: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-22 Thread Randy Kramer
Does it only select, or does it also download and/or install? If so, (and without having tried the program), I'd like words that convey the full range of activity. (More like "automatically install other required programs", or "get and install requirements"). If the next step is to download

Re: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-22 Thread John Allen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree the checkbox "Automatic dependencies" seems badly understood. Any better words? "Silent dependencies", "No dependencies warnings"??? thanks, cu Pixel. -- John Allen,

Re: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-22 Thread Michael Brown
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Randy Kramer wrote: Does it only select, or does it also download and/or install? If so, (and without having tried the program), I'd like words that convey the full range of activity. (More like "automatically install other required programs", or "get and install

Re: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-22 Thread Randy Kramer
Sounds reasonable to me! Randy Kramer Michael Brown wrote: Since, AFAICT, dependencies are always installed, and the only difference the button makes is whether or not they are shown as selected in the package selection list, how about: "Show automatically-selected packages" This makes

Re: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-22 Thread Pixel
Michael Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Show automatically-selected packages" i like it. Quite long though, but can't find anything shorter...

[Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-21 Thread Pixel
the checkbox "Automatic dependencies" seems badly understood. Any better words? "Silent dependencies", "No dependencies warnings"??? thanks, cu Pixel.

Re: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-21 Thread guran
On Wednesday 21 March 2001 13:08, you wrote: the checkbox "Automatic dependencies" seems badly understood. Any better words? "Silent dependencies", "No dependencies warnings"??? thanks, cu Pixel. Hi Dependencies among packages checked regards guran

RE: [Cooker] RFC DrakX package selection tree

2001-03-21 Thread Eaon
ot a word I use in everyday conversation. :-) Maybe a different word like "required" or "related" should be used in place of "dependencies". Eaon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 200