On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:12:41AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Only if the date on the souce tarball (notice -r flag) had changed, which
> should only really happen if the source had changed. It's a bit of a hack,
> but it should be useful IMHO. I haven't tested this yet (just got back
> from holi
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > I think we could do with a few more rpm macros, or some scripts to
> > automate building from cvs a bit more. How about:
> >
> > %define rel 1mdk
> >
> > %if build_cvs
> > Release:%(echo "
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 17:05:57 -0500
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, probably all ATI cards - I'm not very familiar with how much
> > has changed with X.
>
>
> Well, I'll give a shot on 1 of them and see what happens.
The update worked without problem with the rage 128 so t
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:42:48 -0500
Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Will this effect all ATI cards or only Radeons.
> > Have 2 systems with rage 128s and if they to will suffer I will hold
> > off upgrading XFree on at least 1 of them.
>
> Yeah, probably all ATI cards - I'm not very
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> I think we could do with a few more rpm macros, or some scripts to
> automate building from cvs a bit more. How about:
>
> %define rel 1mdk
>
> %if build_cvs
> Release: %(echo "0.`date +%Y%m%d -r %{SOURCE}`.%{rel}")
> %else
> Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 26 December 2002 03:26 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:13:07 -0500
>
> Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I imagine the next mdk kernel will fix this when it comes, the drm
> > kernel modules for X need to b
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:32:21PM +0100, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> >
> > On 2002.12.26 Frederic Lepied wrote:
> > > --=-=-=
> > > Name: XFree86 Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > > Version : 4.2.99.3 V
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:13:07 -0500
Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I imagine the next mdk kernel will fix this when it comes, the drm
> kernel modules for X need to be re-compiled for radeon.
So we are penalized for using a card with an open source driver whereas
system which use the
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:32:21PM +0100, J.A. Magallón wrote:
>
> On 2002.12.26 Frederic Lepied wrote:
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: XFree86 Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 4.2.99.3 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 0.20022312.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I imagine the next mdk kernel will fix this when it comes, the drm kernel
modules for X need to be re-compiled for radeon.
Oddly enough I recompiled the gatos kernel drm for 4.3.0 and all I get is a
blank screen anyway.
On Thursday 26 December 200
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:18:06 +0100 (CET)
Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Name: XFree86 Relocations: (not
> relocateable) Version : 4.2.99.3 Vendor:
> MandrakeSoft Release : 0.20022312.1mdk Build Date:
> Thu De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I compile my own kernels, should I still use the gatos drm kernel module for
use with this X?
Thanks.
BTW for anyone reluctant to try - Installed and works good so far, AA fonts
never looked better! Love the new mouse pointer.
- --
Jason Straight
On 2002.12.26 Frederic Lepied wrote:
> --=-=-=
> Name: XFree86 Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 4.2.99.3 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 0.20022312.1mdk Build Date: Thu Dec 26 14:38:55 2002
Shouldn't this be 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
