Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnomeicu-0.95.3-1mdk

2001-02-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:23:27AM +0800, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > Well, at least the icons is fixed now. Yes, they are. > You can download a fixed 2mdk and > let me know what happens, the icons should be there. Icons are there but I was still getting stack overflows. > Well, unfortunately I d

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnomeicu-0.95.3-1mdk

2001-02-14 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 08:32:37AM -0800, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 01:56:04AM +0800, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > > > This is kind of strange because I only built it against whatever is in cooker. > > I have no idea what is wrong. > > I don't know either but the RPM on Source

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnomeicu-0.95.3-1mdk

2001-02-14 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 01:56:04AM +0800, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > This is kind of strange because I only built it against whatever is in cooker. > I have no idea what is wrong. I don't know either but the RPM on SourceForge seems to work just fine. > If you can send more details about this stac

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnomeicu-0.95.3-1mdk

2001-02-13 Thread Geoffrey Lee
> > > > - Put 0.95.3 out for cooker folks. > > Two problems with this release. First of all the RPM is missing the > icons in /usr/share/gnomeicu/icons and second of all, it has a stack Ok. Point noted. > overflow when it is first started. libsafe terminates it due to the > stack overflow.

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnomeicu-0.95.3-1mdk

2001-02-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:30:00AM +0100, Geoffrey Lee wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: gnomeicu Relocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 0.95.3Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Tue Feb 13 09:21:57