On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:26:19 +0200, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
Is it not unstable, it doesn't work with nautilus 1.1.x ... (GNOME 1
vs GNOME 2 ...)
I
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002, 15:45:30 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
--
Götz Waschk student of computer science university Rostock
http://wwwstud.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:48:21 +0200, Goetz Waschk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002, 15:45:30 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic
Crozat:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
Is it not unstable, it doesn't work with nautilus 1.1.x ... (GNOME 1 vs
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002, 15:45:30 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
nautilus-mozilla is a Gnome 1.x thing, and
nautilus-gtkhtml is a Gnoem 2.x thing.
--
I have to reply to my own post, check out this package:
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/pre-gnome2/sources/nautilus-mozilla/nautilus-mozilla-1.1.2.tar.bz2
--
Götz Waschk student of computer science university Rostock
http://wwwstud.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002, 15:53:16 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:48:21 +0200, Goetz Waschk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002, 15:45:30 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic
Crozat:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
Is it not unstable, it doesn't work with nautilus 1.1.x ... (GNOME 1 vs
GNOME 2 ...)
I thought I saw a Gnome2 package named nautilus-mozilla, what
