Re: [Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread Marcel Pol
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:07:50 -0400 David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Laurent Montel wrote: > >> And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate > >> rpms just doesnt make sense. > > > > Why ? > > Do you know libification ? > > Is it necessary when nothing besides

Re: [Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 06:07 am, David Walser wrote: > Laurent Montel wrote: > >> And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate > >> rpms just doesnt make sense. > > > > Why ? > > Do you know libification ? > > Is it necessary when nothing besides that single app

[Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread David Walser
Laurent Montel wrote: >> And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate >> rpms just doesnt make sense. > > Why ? > Do you know libification ? Is it necessary when nothing besides that single app is ever going to use the library?

Re: [Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3680 days Luca Berra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 05:14:54AM -0500, Vox wrote: >>On September 1993 plus 3680 days David Walser wrote: >>> What about majordomo? > majordomo sucks a lot, i don't even think it is mantained anymore. > >> So...I think mailman is a better sol

Re: [Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread Luca Berra
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 05:14:54AM -0500, Vox wrote: On September 1993 plus 3680 days David Walser wrote: What about majordomo? majordomo sucks a lot, i don't even think it is mantained anymore. So...I think mailman is a better solution. Vox, who hates sympa I still prefer sympa to mailman, sym

Re: [Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread Leon Brooks
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:02, David Walser wrote: > Can Mailman be configured to correctly set the reply-to to the list? "Correctly" is a matter of opinion (one I happen to agree with) but it's a simple option for each list and can be made the default for new lists. > What about majordomo? Bug/vu

Re: [Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3680 days David Walser wrote: > Vox wrote: >> Tho, since we are talking about the mailing listscould we >> *please* get rid of sympa and start using mailman or any other >> *decent* mailing list software? Sympa has proved over and over and >> over again that it c

[Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread David Walser
Vox wrote: > Tho, since we are talking about the mailing listscould we > *please* get rid of sympa and start using mailman or any other > *decent* mailing list software? Sympa has proved over and over and > over again that it can't deal with the mandrake mailing lists and > that it sh

Re: [Cooker] Re: And next?

2003-09-28 Thread Pierre Jarillon
Le Dimanche 28 Septembre 2003 13:23, guran a écrit : > I will discuss drakconnect and my perceptions. I have a similar perception... The architecture of drakconnect must be rebuilt. I wish an extensive use of profiles. Examples: home eth0adslfirewall on

[Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-28 Thread David Walser
Warly wrote: > It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to > have some brainstorm. > > May you give your opinion on : > > - What was wrong in 9.2 development process? the mirror situation, of course Also, a lot of MDK developers got heavy into bugfixing the last coup

Re: [Cooker] Re: And next?

2003-09-28 Thread guran
söndagen den 28 september 2003 13.23 skrev guran: > Thus Mdk should have 'navigation plan' as in " Navigare necesse est vivere > non est necesse". > To me this plan has to coincide with the plan from the user community, if > you want them to cooperate in its fullfillment. Here is a discussion 'na

[Cooker] Re: And next?

2003-09-28 Thread guran
Hi I will discuss drakconnect and my perceptions. This setup has two boxes, a firewall with Mdk 9.1 and a user box with different Linux distributions. Firewall setup. My firewall has a stable IP and many local DNS's. During setup I only have the right to setup one DNS server. The reason for mor