Re: [Cooker] Re: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Ron Stodden
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have no "fakeroot". > > was uploaded by fred just after the oxygen release : With perfect certainty, there was NO fakeroot rpm in the final Oxygen tree. This tree is now the Mandrake/7.0 tree

Re: [Cooker] Re: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: [..] > Yes there is that too. I was going to use that reason too but did not > want to get accused of being lazy or something for not closely examing > the "make install" output rather than just looking for the permission > errors. not a first for me

Re: [Cooker] Re: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > Seems a matter of choice to make them %post or before the rpmbuild's, > I > can't come up with a reason todo it either way, so everybody feel free > to > take a

RE: [Cooker] RE: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Thomas M. Beaudry
You really should see a doctor about prescribing something to calm your tendencies towards hysteria... Never said install and build are the same thing. But does not matter whether the build environment is restricted or not, as long as it's set up properly for the build. If the build is good, th

Re: [Cooker] Re: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But this is something that should be done with a postinstall script, no? not on this case. > > we fake this with fakeroot : > > > > -$ fakeoot rpm -ba kernel. > > [brian@pc brian]$ which fakeroot > which: no fakeroot in > (/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X

[Cooker] Re: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Thomas M. Beaudry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > don't need to be build as root, unfortunately kernel do some mknod to > create Ibcs inode, But this is something that should be done with a postinstall scrip

[Cooker] RE: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of "Thomas M. Beaudry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <000901bf6616$bf7fca40$b08380d8@mosehern> > Maybe I'm being naive here but... > > Seeing as nobody but root should be able to change the installed ^^ > kernel, > what's the probl

[Cooker] Re: Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > I think thats a bit tomuch crypto for the cd's isn't it? I was thinking about that. The recent rumblings about US export might make it possible. It is my (ve