Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> and move the idea's and effort into making debian a better distro instead of
>> duplicating the effort?
>
> one main difference with debian, is that mandrake (tries to) takes
> into account the users's needs (an
this might be just the place to put a plug in for the "mandrake-ot" mail list,
something created by a mandrake user, to help keep S-N-R to the min.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the e-mail address, and it uses sympa so the
commands should be something most can handle, and if they need any further
help,
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:34, Guy.Bormann wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2003-02-09 a
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:41, Greg Meyer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 10 February 2003 03:15 am, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Stupid estimation! My name isn't Martin Schulze!!! I was sent a mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the url of this thread, if yo
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 10 February 2003 12:22 am, Steve Fox wrote:
> > The only thing in doubt is the reference
> > to 'Mandrake developers', which makes it sound like Mandrakesoft
> > employees were in this discussion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 03:15 am, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Stupid estimation! My name isn't Martin Schulze!!! I was sent a mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the url of this thread, if you can read my
> name isn't cited in the news.The DWN issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 12:22 am, Steve Fox wrote:
> The only thing in doubt is the reference
> to 'Mandrake developers', which makes it sound like Mandrakesoft
> employees were in this discussion, which they were not.
The article insinuates that t
On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, G
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 03:22, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 22:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
>
> > In my estimation, you have completely misrepresented the discussion that was
> > going on here by substituting your own wishful thinking and by using out of
> > context comments by people committ
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > > > Any person has the same
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 22:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
> In my estimation, you have completely misrepresented the discussion that was
> going on here by substituting your own wishful thinking and by using out of
> context comments by people committed to making Mandrake successful. That is
> not being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > > Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
> >
> > Just a lurker on this
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 18:05, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I was sent a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] talking about the topics discussed
> here, this thread will be reported in the next issue of Debian Weekly
> News(DWN) [1].
>
> [1] = http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/Writing/DWN/dwn-2003-06.html
Brilliant!
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
>
> Just a lurker on this thread (since it's really gone awry), but I would
> say definitely not. You've been a very good diplomat for t
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
Just a lurker on this thread (since it's really gone awry), but I would
say definitely not. You've been a very good diplomat for the Debian
project.
--
Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org
> Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
ET, stands up waving both arms above head like a mad man who has been stuck on
a desert island for years, upon seeing his rescue ship.
Lonnie spoke for me too..
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:51, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 22:28, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> > Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
> >
> > please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
> > u
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 22:28, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
>
> please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
> useless and out of context...
Well, I think, for the good of all
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:28, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
>
> please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
> useless and out of context...
Definitely, i agree.But some people
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:28, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> You know, the best thing about Linux is that nobody forces you to use
> anything that you don't want to. In other words, not one person is
> forcing anybody to use or to contribute to Mandrake. If you feel that
> you are not getting what you
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
useless and out of context...
You know, the best thing about Linux is that nobody forces you to use
anything that you don't want to. In other words, not one person is
forcing anybody to use or to contribute to Mandrake. If you feel that
you are not getting what you need from Mandrake, then for heaven's sake
please go find ano
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 18:53, Buchan Milne wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
> > Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>>In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
> >>>upgrade".I can see :P
> >>
> >>We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this i
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 18:37, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The latest Debian release, called Woody doesn't supports XFS officially,
> > but you can use a solution[1] made by a developer.The reason is very
> > simple: Stability first, features[2] after.
John Goerzen wrote:
> Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>>In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
>>>upgrade".I can see :P
>>
>>We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
>>cron), and it gives me more than Debain does, unless Debian h
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The latest Debian release, called Woody doesn't supports XFS officially,
> but you can use a solution[1] made by a developer.The reason is very
> simple: Stability first, features[2] after.
>
> If your choice is: Features first.Debian can solve your pro
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 16:12, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 18:34, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
> > >> upgrade".I can see :P
> > >
> > > We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 17:34, John Goerzen wrote:
> Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
> >> upgrade".I can see :P
> >
> > We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
> > cron), and it gives me mor
On Saturday 08 February 2003 18:34, John Goerzen wrote:
> Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
> >> upgrade".I can see :P
> >
> > We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
> > cron), and it gives me
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:34 pm, John Goerzen wrote:
> Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
> >> upgrade".I can see :P
> >
> > We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
> > cron), and it gives
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In one months or two you're doing: "apt-get update; apt-get -uy
>> upgrade".I can see :P
>
> We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
> cron), and it gives me more than Debain does, unless Debian has XFS+ACL
This is an hones
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mandrake as a new project inside Debian.But it was refused here, many feels
> involved.But if you change the original idea, try debian-project ML.The
> Debian-Mandrake can receive financial support of SPI as described by
> Goerzen, more and more develop
Michael Scherer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. A developer is still maintaining a package, but wants to stop
>> 2. A developer has stopped maintaining the package and wants to let
>> others know about it.
>
> Well, orphaned package need to be adopted before any work is done on it,
> that's rig
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 19:51, John Goerzen a écrit :
> I would like to try to offer a bit of insight
> on what Debian has done right, what Debian has done wrong, and perhaps
> explore some areas Debian can work together with the Mandrake
> community in the future.
You 're welcome.
> >> I als
Austin Acton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> the lines of the Debian Desktop project. Or, joining the existing
>> Desktop and installer projects.
>
> Are you serious?
No, just opening Pandora's Box a little :-)
Really, I'm just putting forth options, which may be really bad or may
be really good
Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think Mandrake goal has always be very different from debian one.
>
> Mandrake is a distribution focused on user, aimed to ease linux access
> to everybody, and which is very reactive and on the cutting edge.
>
> Debian is more developper oriented and with a t
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > PS: Some friends have always argued that the debian way is the only
>> > sustainable way to go. If mdk is going to do it just like debian, why
>> > not fold and move the idea's and effort into making debian a better
>> > distro instead of duplicating
Before I reply to your message, Michael, let me briefly let people
know why I'm involved :-) I've been a Debian developer since 1995 or
so, and someone recently posted to our developer's list information
about this thread, and I would like to try to offer a bit of insight
on what Debian has done r
38 matches
Mail list logo