On Friday 31 October 2003 5:42 pm, Luca Berra wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:29:24PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
BTW, it appears that autofs 4.1 has/will have direct mount support,
including with maps in LDAP.
Great!
btw, is there a way of preventing dynamic to show on an icon on the
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Thanks for the kick in the pants. Looks like autofs can do what I need.
Looks like this feature slipped in during 9.0 (or 8.2) and I didn't
notice.
Now if only autofs would support direct mounts we'd be another step
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:29:24PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
BTW, it appears that autofs 4.1 has/will have direct mount support,
including with maps in LDAP.
Great!
btw, is there a way of preventing dynamic to show on an icon on the
desktop for every automounted directory?
Regards,
L.
--
Luca
On Friday 12 September 2003 00:57, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:
[snipped]
This config wants mail in /var/ to be mounted from a nfs server, but
you can't have /var managed by autofs. So autofs will watch the mail
directory directly. When a program enters/opens the directory
Buchan Milne wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Thanks for the kick in the pants. Looks like autofs can do what I need.
Looks like this feature slipped in during 9.0 (or 8.2) and I didn't
notice.
Now if only autofs would support direct mounts we'd be another step
closer to Solaris... ;)
Could you
Bryan Whitehead [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But it's in contrib, there is an alternative in main = what's the
problem?
The problem is while I'm a Mandrake monkey and can handle the misisng
package other SA's who just want a fully shipped distro don't want to
have to 1) ask for it 2) look for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Warly wrote:
Bryan Whitehead [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But it's in contrib, there is an alternative in main = what's the
problem?
The problem is while I'm a Mandrake monkey and can handle the misisng
package other SA's who just want a fully
Le Mercredi 10 Septembre 2003 11:12, Warly a écrit :
[...]
am-utils, as said, stil live into contribs, but if some kind of popular
vote ask for it back into main, so be it.
And first you removed it, I reintroduce it in contrib myself...
The story of an obsoletes application... :)
--
Linux
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:21:25AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Thanks for the kick in the pants. Looks like autofs can do what I need.
Looks like this feature slipped in during 9.0 (or 8.2) and I didn't
notice.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Oosthoek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:21:25AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Thanks for the kick in the pants. Looks like autofs can do what I need.
Looks like this feature slipped in during 9.0 (or 8.2) and I didn't
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 12:55:45PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
Packages in main are updated for security, and contribs are not. This is
bad, since, to give a example, some packages like apache2 modules are
in main, and others are in contribs. But, on mdk9.1, apache was
updated, and only
David Walser wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big
UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this package was
removed
But it's in contrib, there is an alternative in main = what's the
problem?
The problem is while I'm a Mandrake monkey and can handle the misisng
package other SA's who just want a fully shipped distro don't want to
have to 1) ask for it 2) look for it 3) get it 4) install it. They want
basic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
David Walser wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into
big UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
But it's in contrib, there is an alternative in main = what's the
problem?
The problem is while I'm a Mandrake monkey and can handle the misisng
package other SA's who just want a fully shipped distro don't want to
have
Buchan Milne wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
David Walser wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into
big UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty screwed... is
Buchan Milne wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into
big UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this package
was removed from 9.2 ? Has it just
As you will see, the only entries in our LDAP automount maps are those we
need all the time (/home/{users,groups,projects}) on most machines (the
ones people need to be sure of, so we can modify the LDAP automount
entries and be sure each machine will use the correct share on next
access), I have
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Well, if am-utils is better, it should replace autofs in main (autofs can
go to contrib). But, AFAIK, there is no alternative for uucp, and packages
in main (postfix) contain entries in the default config for it (thus you
kind of
On Sunday 07 September 2003 12:20, Luca Berra wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Well, if am-utils is better, it should replace autofs in main
(autofs can go to contrib). But, AFAIK, there is no alternative for
uucp, and packages in main (postfix) contain
On Sunday 07 September 2003 03:37, Vincent Danen wrote:
So, by your point above, we should have one of everything in main?
Well, where's my better implementation of gkrellm-plugins (in
contribs). Oh, well, just for kicks, let's throw a few others out
there. Where's my alternative to zssh
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 12:48:08PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2003 12:20, Luca Berra wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Well, if am-utils is better, it should replace autofs in main
(autofs can go to contrib). But, AFAIK, there is no
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2003 03:37, Vincent Danen wrote:
So, by your point above, we should have one of everything in main?
Well, where's my better implementation of gkrellm-plugins (in
contribs). Oh, well, just for kicks, let's throw a few
On Sunday 07 September 2003 13:27, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
we should first think what does having a package in main implies :
Package in main are on cds. This is important, because it means
that they can be installed without internet connection.
Ainsi parlait Luca Berra :
no, it is not needed,
postfix works wonderfully with
mailbox_command =
which means that postfix local takes care of deliveries, it even works
better than procmail with maildirs
the above should be the default and
procmail %post and %postun could invoke
postconf
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Luca Berra :
no, it is not needed,
postfix works wonderfully with
mailbox_command =
which means that postfix local takes care of deliveries, it even works
better than procmail with maildirs
the above should be the default
Ainsi parlait Buchan Milne :
The changes to procmail would be more complex, since I assume we don't
want procmail to require postfix, so it will need to run postfonf only if
postfix is installed (to avoid an error) and run the postconf via triggers
if postfix is installed after procmail.
What
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Fri Sep 05, 2003 at 08:08:52PM -0400, David Walser wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big
UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty
On Sat Sep 06, 2003 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big
UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this package
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big
UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this package was
removed from 9.2 ? Has it
On Fri Sep 05, 2003 at 08:08:52PM -0400, David Walser wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big
UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this package was
31 matches
Mail list logo
