On Thursday 25 September 2003 05:58 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> Anyway, the patch in the SRPM is the one from Netraverse, which they
> were using for 2.4.22.7mdk, and since it still takes, I don't see that
> they would need to change it.
>
> Netraverse will have kernels out quite soon I guess, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
> Any chance that the "official" kernel for 9.2 could be "officially"
provided
> to Netraverse so they can get working on an "official" Netraverse
supported
> kernel for Win4Lin that will work with their graphical installer?
Well, AF
Any chance that the "official" kernel for 9.2 could be "officially" provided
to Netraverse so they can get working on an "official" Netraverse supported
kernel for Win4Lin that will work with their graphical installer?
I know Buchan has built a 9.2 kernel in contrib that supports Win4Lin, but
l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin wrote:
> SMP runs great, Buchan.
> It even runs win4lin!
It would be pretty useless if it didn't ;-).
Thanks for testing!
Regards,
Buchan
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMecha
On 09/19/2003 01:34:46 PM, Buchan Milne wrote:
Could you remove the entry, run lilo, and see if lilo runs ok, if it
boots etc (and I would also like to know the image names lilo has -
there should be a win4lin-smp and a 2422-10mdkw4l or similar.
2422-10smpw4l actually.
Austin
--
On 09/19/2003 01:34:46 PM, Buchan Milne wrote:
> installing
> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/kernel-win4lin-smp-2.4.22.10mdk-3-5mdk.i586. rpm
> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/win4lin-utils-3-5mdk.i586.rpm
> Preparing...
> ##
> 1:win4lin-utils
> ##
SMP runs great, Buchan.
It even runs win4lin!
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
Department of Chemistry, York University, Toronto
MandrakeClub Volunteer (www.mandrakeclub.com)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin wrote:
> UP version installs and runs perfectly.
> SMP gives this error on install:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] austin]# urpmi kernel-win4lin-smp-2.4.22.10mdk
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
> installed (2 MB):
> ker
UP version installs and runs perfectly.
SMP gives this error on install:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] austin]# urpmi kernel-win4lin-smp-2.4.22.10mdk
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (2
MB):
kernel-win4lin-smp-2.4.22.10mdk-3-5mdk.i586
win4lin-utils-3-5mdk.i586
Is this
On 09/18/2003 07:39:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just build a new win4lin kernel for 2.4.22.10mdk and uploaded to
contrib, but I probably won't be able to test it until late tomorrow - so
I would appreciate if someone with win4lin could test it (preferably all 3
kernels - up, smp, enterpr
I have just build a new win4lin kernel for 2.4.22.10mdk and uploaded to
contrib, but I probably won't be able to test it until late tomorrow - so
I would appreciate if someone with win4lin could test it (preferably all 3
kernels - up, smp, enterprise). Even if you don't have win4lin, if you're
bore
Hoyt wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 29 November 2000 01:49 am, you wrote:
>
> >
> > Right now that 's what has kept me from trying Win4Lin. I have a nicely
> > running system and won't do a whole lot to it until Mandrake has a 2.4
> > based distro ( yes my main box is still at 7.1 )
> >
>
> Then they
Jim Bradley wrote:
> I think that you are the one with the misperception. I think that Randy wants
> the newest and greatest Mandrake kernel, and to do that you have to build your
Randy explicitly stated that he was running 7.1.
> having to use Win4Lin's Mandrake kernel (or other), which is a 2
** Reply to message from Larry Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 29 Nov
2000 08:02:57 -0500
> Randy, it seems that some misperception is being distributed that you
> need to build kernels and such to run win4lin. That's simply not the
> case, though there is no sitting kernel that works with
> Right now that 's what has kept me from trying Win4Lin. I have a nicely
> running system and won't do a whole lot to it until Mandrake has a 2.4
> based distro ( yes my main box is still at 7.1 )
Randy, it seems that some misperception is being distributed that you
need to build kernels and s
On Wednesday 29 November 2000 01:49 am, you wrote:
>
> Right now that 's what has kept me from trying Win4Lin. I have a nicely
> running system and won't do a whole lot to it until Mandrake has a 2.4
> based distro ( yes my main box is still at 7.1 )
>
Then they provide a patched Mandrake 7.1 k
>
>
> IIRC, they are similar to the kernel hooks already added to support VMware,
> so there _should_ be no ideological issues here.
>
There are no special 'VMware' hooks in Mandrake. VMware has modules
they load into the kernel. No re-compile of the kernel source required.
Since running r
- Original Message -
From: "Leon Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 8:32 AM
Subject: [Cooker] Win4Lin kernel patches (was: running IE 5)
> "Raymond S. Swaim" wrote:
>
> >> It would be nice
"Raymond S. Swaim" wrote:
>> Probably [Win4Lin] won't be [Open Source], but it would be nice if the Mandrake
>> folks included the Win4Lin hooks in the Mandrake kernel. I've tried to get both
>> parties talking, but no luck. For using Windows apps in a Linux business
>> environment, Win4Lin seems
19 matches
Mail list logo
