To: Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Would like to contribute packages
Hi Arthur,
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Arthur wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:24:06 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Schade
> <[E
Hi Arthur,
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Arthur wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:24:06 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Schade
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Why is Roxen better than Apache?
> > o It's written in pike, a interpreter-language
> How can that be faster than something compiled? Has anyone compared
>
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Arthur wrote:
> >> Why is Roxen better than Apache?
> >
> > o It's written in pike, a interpreter-language
>
> How can that be faster than something compiled? Has anyone compared
> performance of Roxen vs. Apache at high load?
If you need performance and you're using stati
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:24:06 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Schade
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why is Roxen better than Apache?
>
> o It's written in pike, a interpreter-language
How can that be faster than something compiled? Has anyone compared
performance of Roxen vs. Apache at high load?
Hi Arthur,
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Arthur wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:30:04 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Schade
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I would like to contribute packages to Mandrake:
> > o Roxen 1.3.111 (webserver, much better than Apache, WWW-administration)
> I want to use the best. Why i
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:30:04 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Schade
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I would like to contribute packages to Mandrake:
>
> o Roxen 1.3.111 (webserver, much better than Apache, WWW-administration)
I want to use the best. Why is Roxen better than Apache?
Hi,
I would like to contribute packages to Mandrake:
o Roxen 1.3.111 (webserver, much better than Apache, WWW-administration)
o Third-Party-Modules for Roxen
o Fonts for Roxen
And maybe (in the future) some security-tools (like Tripwire, Netsaint, ...).
According to the webpages I have
