Re: [Cooker] bastille-firewall for the shorewall challenged

2002-08-26 Thread Florin
I'm surprised to notice that you didn't succeed in configuring Shorewall. It's really a piece of cake. Maybe the problem is that the firewall approach is a bit different and has several (more logical, if you ask me) configuration files ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chuck Shirley) writes: Hello

Re: [Cooker] bastille-firewall for the shorewall challenged

2002-08-26 Thread Florin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chuck Shirley) writes: On Monday 26 August 2002 05:21, Florin wrote: I'm surprised to notice that you didn't succeed in configuring Shorewall. It's really a piece of cake. Maybe the problem is that the firewall approach is a bit different and has several (more logical, if

Re: [Cooker] bastille-firewall for the shorewall challenged

2002-08-26 Thread Chuck Shirley
On Monday 26 August 2002 05:21, Florin wrote: I'm surprised to notice that you didn't succeed in configuring Shorewall. It's really a piece of cake. Maybe the problem is that the firewall approach is a bit different and has several (more logical, if you ask me) configuration files ... I think,

[Cooker] bastille-firewall for the shorewall challenged

2002-08-25 Thread Chuck Shirley
Hello Cookers! First, this is not a plea to have the Bastille packages re- integrated with cooker. I'm sure that the Mangagement was very careful in their decision to drop Bastille in favour of Shorewall, and I won't whine about it, but for folks like me who are too busy with other things to