Hi!
Is it intentional that /sbin/fsck.vfat is missing from dosfstools?
/sbin/dosfsck is present, only the symlink to /sbin/fsck.vfat (and
/sbin/fsck.msdos) is IMHO missing.
--
Michael Reinsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mr.uue.org
Michael Reinsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it intentional that /sbin/fsck.vfat is missing from dosfstools?
/sbin/dosfsck is present, only the symlink to /sbin/fsck.vfat (and
/sbin/fsck.msdos) is IMHO missing.
it used to be unsafe to use dosfsck. That's why it was better not to
check fat's.
Hi!
On Son, 19 Mai 2002 14:28:01 Pixel wrote:
it used to be unsafe to use dosfsck. That's why it was better not to
check fat's. This may have changed (i don't see any mention of danger
in dosfsck)
Well, ok, dosfsck says, it's still alpha for fat32.
And it is probably wise to let windows
