Re: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-19 Thread Daniel Serodio
On 2001.03.15 16:26:21 -0300 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > David R Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I tried upgrading glibc by installing glibc-2.2.2-4mdk > andcompat-glibc-7.2-2.1.3.2mdk. Where can I find this RPM? I´ve looked for it everywhere... -- []'s

Re: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Daniel Serodio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2001.03.15 16:26:21 -0300 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > David R Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I tried upgrading glibc by installing glibc-2.2.2-4mdk > > andcompat-glibc-7.2-2.1.3.2mdk. > > Where can I find this RPM? I´ve looked

Re: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-16 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Is it a better option *NOT* to include /etc/ld.so.conf into glibc main package, and only create it inside %pre script *IF* it isn't a glibc upgrade? In that way upgrading glibc will never damage ld.so.conf! Abel Cheung On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Jose wrote: > I've also have had the same problem when

Re: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-16 Thread David R Newman
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > The result was a zero length, completely empty /etc/ld.so.conf. > > > > > > > > What should I put there to make sure applications always link to the > > > > correct version of glibc? At present, I seem to o

Re: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-16 Thread Jose
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > The result was a zero length, completely empty /etc/ld.so.conf. > > > > > > > > What should I put there to make sure applications always link to the > > > > correct version of glibc? At present, I seem to o

Re: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > The result was a zero length, completely empty /etc/ld.so.conf. > > > > > > What should I put there to make sure applications always link to the > > > correct version of glibc? At present, I seem to only be able to get > > > linking worki

RE: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-15 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
> > > > The result was a zero length, completely empty /etc/ld.so.conf. > > > > What should I put there to make sure applications always link to the > > correct version of glibc? At present, I seem to only be able to get > > linking working to one or the other, not both. > > no need to put anythi

Re: [Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
David R Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried upgrading glibc by installing glibc-2.2.2-4mdk >andcompat-glibc-7.2-2.1.3.2mdk. > > The result was a zero length, completely empty /etc/ld.so.conf. > > What should I put there to make sure applications always link to the > correct version of

[Cooker] glibc-2.2.2-4mdk installs zero-length /etc/ld.so.conf

2001-03-15 Thread David R Newman
I tried upgrading glibc by installing glibc-2.2.2-4mdk andcompat-glibc-7.2-2.1.3.2mdk. The result was a zero length, completely empty /etc/ld.so.conf. What should I put there to make sure applications always link to the correct version of glibc? At present, I seem to only be able to get linking