Re: [Cooker] init scripts policy?

2002-05-30 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Jay DeKing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lots of people edit them. And they only don't get replaced when they've been changed. Otherwise it's not a problem. So if you edit one and upgrade it hopefully you're smart enough to look for the .rpmnew file. I edit a LOT of them, and would not

Re: [Cooker] init scripts policy?

2002-05-29 Thread Jay DeKing
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 02:23 am, Ben Reser wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:06:09AM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: Is there any policy related to init scripts? I see absolutely no reasons to define them as noreplace except for very special cases (like rc.local probably). Lots of people

Re: [Cooker] init scripts policy?

2002-05-28 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:06:09AM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: Is there any policy related to init scripts? I see absolutely no reasons to define them as noreplace except for very special cases (like rc.local probably). Lots of people edit them. And they only don't get replaced when

Re: [Cooker] init scripts policy?

2002-05-28 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Most init scripts I have seen are defined as noreplace. It has unfortunate effect - if init script is changed, it is not replaced. It means that in postinstall section rpm actually runs restart with _old_ script. Which is obviously wrong (exactly in

[Cooker] init scripts policy?

2002-05-27 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
Most init scripts I have seen are defined as noreplace. It has unfortunate effect - if init script is changed, it is not replaced. It means that in postinstall section rpm actually runs restart with _old_ script. Which is obviously wrong (exactly in case when script has changed). Is there any