On ÷ÓË, 2001-10-21 at 18:49, Robin Cook wrote:
> Hello Borsenkow,
>
> The -i eth1 doesn't work it says it can't be used in postrouting.
>
O.K., should have checked man page first :-)
> Ok tried the static arp with the same results.
> I also used "ip address add 172.16.231.x dev eth0" which put
Hello Borsenkow,
The -i eth1 doesn't work it says it can't be used in postrouting.
Ok tried the static arp with the same results.
I also used "ip address add 172.16.231.x dev eth0" which put the ips on
eth0 with the same results.
Sunday, October 21, 2001, 8:52:24 AM, you wrote:
BA> On ÷ÓË, 200
On ÷ÓË, 2001-10-21 at 09:01, Robin Cook wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> Found the problem to the single ping return.
>
> iptables -t nat -s 10.1.1.0/24 -o eth0 -j SNAT 172.16.231.57-172.16.231.59
>
Yes I was about to suggest the same. You can also do
-i eth1 -o eth0
to match only packets from
Hello David,
Found the problem to the single ping return.
iptables -t nat -s 10.1.1.0/24 -o eth0 -j SNAT 172.16.231.57-172.16.231.59
if I leave the -s 10.1.1.0/24 out, the routing box and the outside box
stop being able to ping to the ISP or Internet (just the first one
returns the re
> Once I turn NAT on all communication between the 2 nic cards seems
> to die. With NAT off I can send data between the 2 sides (I put a
> machine on the outside network for test.)
>
What exactly do you mean? Please, give command that worked before and
fails after NAT has been enabled, tog
Hello,
I seem to be having an iptables problem.
Once I turn NAT on all communication between the 2 nic cards seems
to die. With NAT off I can send data between the 2 sides (I put a
machine on the outside network for test.)
in /etc/sysconfig/iptables I add the following line in the NA
