Hi,
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 11:43, Florent BERANGER wrote:
What can it break ?
Java and WINE, for starters.
Sun fixed compatibility with glibc 2.3.X in JDK 1.4.1, IIRC. As for
Wine, I would like more information.
Thanks,
Gwenole.
> What is your reason for asking for it so often ? You really need it ?
Yes, because glibc 2.2.5 and gcc 3.2 combination doesn´t work with C++ IDE of
Borland Kylix 3 Professional Editation. :-(((
Regards,
Attila Goda
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 11:43, Florent BERANGER wrote:
> What can it break ?
Java and WINE, for starters.
--
Brad Felmey
Le Dimanche 27 Octobre 2002 04:21, Ben Reser a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > this is unstable/devel/testing/whatever and things built against
> > previous versions should be rebuilt, so was the case with gcc-3.1,3.2
> > and other major upgra
On Sunday 27 October 2002 07:11, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:08:43AM +0100, Per �yvind Karlsen wrote:
> > yeah, but still, the need of rebuilding stuff against a new glibc
> > version should'nt be a reason for not upgrading glibc, that was my
> > point:)
>
> My understanding was
On Sunday 27 October 2002 12:11 am, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:08:43AM +0100, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > yeah, but still, the need of rebuilding stuff against a new glibc
> > version should'nt be a reason for not upgrading glibc, that was my
> > point:)
>
> My understanding wa
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:08:43AM +0100, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> yeah, but still, the need of rebuilding stuff against a new glibc
> version should'nt be a reason for not upgrading glibc, that was my point:)
My understanding was that it broke stuff behind just recompiling them
for it. But I
Ben Reser wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
this is unstable/devel/testing/whatever and things built against
previous versions should be rebuilt, so was the case with gcc-3.1,3.2
and other major upgrades;)
This is not an unstable tree. It's a d
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> this is unstable/devel/testing/whatever and things built against
> previous versions should be rebuilt, so was the case with gcc-3.1,3.2
> and other major upgrades;)
This is not an unstable tree. It's a development/testing tr
On Saturday 26 October 2002 12:46 pm, Florent BERANGER wrote:
> Le Samedi 26 Octobre 2002 19:08, Peter Ruskin a écrit :
> > On Saturday 26 Oct 2002 17:43, Florent BERANGER wrote:
> > > > To answer the question in the title, yes there are problems with
> > > > glibc 2.3.1. It can break a lot of stu
Le Samedi 26 Octobre 2002 19:08, Peter Ruskin a écrit :
> On Saturday 26 Oct 2002 17:43, Florent BERANGER wrote:
> > > To answer the question in the title, yes there are problems with
> > > glibc 2.3.1. It can break a lot of stuff already built against
> > > previous versions.
> >
> > What can it
On Saturday 26 Oct 2002 17:43, Florent BERANGER wrote:
> > To answer the question in the title, yes there are problems with
> > glibc 2.3.1. It can break a lot of stuff already built against
> > previous versions.
>
> What can it break ?
>
ncurses and python for a start ... I didn't stay with it f
> To answer the question in the title, yes there are problems with glibc
> 2.3.1. It can break a lot of stuff already built against previous
> versions.
What can it break ?
Florent
--
EXCEPTIONNEL!
Tiscali lance les forfaits Internet Illimités,
à partir de 15,95EUR / mois.
Pour en
Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Saturday 26 Oct 2002 15:43, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Saturday 26 October 2002 08:26 am, Pascal Terjan wrote:
Florent BERANGER wrote:
RedHat have it and C applications, as KDE, are faster, it's a
known thing.
Kde is c++ or am i wrong ?
And the fact
On Saturday 26 Oct 2002 15:43, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> On Saturday 26 October 2002 08:26 am, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> > Florent BERANGER wrote:
> > > RedHat have it and C applications, as KDE, are faster, it's a
> > > known thing.
> >
> > Kde is c++ or am i wrong ?
> > And the fact that cooker kde
On Saturday 26 October 2002 08:26 am, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> Florent BERANGER wrote:
> > RedHat have it and C applications, as KDE, are faster, it's a known
> > thing.
>
> Kde is c++ or am i wrong ?
> And the fact that cooker kde is slow does not come from glibc... look
> at the kde shipped in 9.0
Florent BERANGER wrote:
RedHat have it and C applications, as KDE, are faster, it's a known thing.
Kde is c++ or am i wrong ?
And the fact that cooker kde is slow does not come from glibc... look at the kde shipped
in 9.0 it's really fast.
Le Dimanche 20 Octobre 2002 21:57, Pascal Terjan a écrit :
> Florent BERANGER wrote:
> >Glibc 2.3.1, a mojor library update is out from times but I didn't see
> > cooker rebuild with it.
> >
> >Is there a reason (time, stability) ?
>
> What is your reason for asking for it so often ? You really nee
18 matches
Mail list logo
