Le Lundi 22 Octobre 2001 04:04, Blue Lizard scribit :
> Chris Edwards wrote:
> >>well, cooker used KDE 2 alpha 1 when it came out.
> >>why not use KDE3? Get the KDE3 bugs worked out along with the
> >>development of
> >>KDE3.
because it use qt3 and qt3 break binary compatibility. So most of the Q
Chris Edwards wrote:
>>well, cooker used KDE 2 alpha 1 when it came out.
>>why not use KDE3? Get the KDE3 bugs worked out along with the
>>development of
>>KDE3.
>>
>>
>
> I'm guessing that the development period of kde3 is much longer than that of
> Mandrake 8.2. I'm sure they want a stable kde
> well, cooker used KDE 2 alpha 1 when it came out.
> why not use KDE3? Get the KDE3 bugs worked out along with the
> development of
> KDE3.
>
I'm guessing that the development period of kde3 is much longer than that of
Mandrake 8.2. I'm sure they want a stable kde in the final release of 8.2,
so
On Sunday 21 October 2001 03:29 pm, you wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What's the plan/schedule for adding kde3 to cooker?
> >
> > -jm
> >
> > _
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> heheh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What's the plan/schedule for adding kde3 to cooker?
>
> -jm
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
hehehe. patience my lad. at least let it make beta. co
What's the plan/schedule for adding kde3 to cooker?
-jm
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
