On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 11:35, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
Just booted with ACPI, seems fine! USB is working great (it didn't
before), and all the stuff in /proc/acpi seems to work nicely. Thanks a
lot Thomas, good
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 23:35, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
What should we be trying to test specifically?
I have no idea :) I have an A7N8X if that is any help.
Damon
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 23:35, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
What should we be trying to test specifically?
whether you can boot with acpi enabled, and if so
does usb work when acpi is enabled.
in
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
there seems to be also a new libata release :-)
with support for promise ( under 2.6 sii too )
If works here on AMD64, though a kernel panic happened once. Only ~57
MB/sec too with a SATA disk on PDC20378. Concerning SIL, it's explicitly
Gwenole Beauchesne kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Tiistai 14 Lokakuu 2003
17:10):
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
there seems to be also a new libata release :-)
with support for promise ( under 2.6 sii too )
If works here on AMD64, though a kernel panic happened once.
src rpm has bad signatures:
-CUT--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] udo]# rpm -ivh kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
error: kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID
4baad8b0
error: kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
cannot be installed
Udo Rader kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Tiistai 14 Lokakuu 2003 20:17):
src rpm has bad signatures:
-CUT--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] udo]# rpm -ivh kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
error: kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD,
key ID 4baad8b0
Am Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:27:44 + schrieb Thomas Backlund:
Udo Rader kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Tiistai 14 Lokakuu 2003 20:17):
src rpm has bad signatures:
-CUT--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] udo]# rpm -ivh kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
error:
Hi
I tested this with the Dell Latitude D600 and noticed that at least
battery status etc does not work with this laptop. (I booted with lilo
options acpi=on apm=of)
I have however found from the net that there exist patch for D600 in the
following url:
lamikr_mdk kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Tiistai 14 Lokakuu 2003 21:34):
Hi
I tested this with the Dell Latitude D600 and noticed that at least
battery status etc does not work with this laptop. (I booted with lilo
options acpi=on apm=of)
That's weird...
looking at the comment:
That's weird...
looking at the comment:
---cut---
with ACPI 20030619 this table seems to be included. It is only necessary with
releases before that.
---cut---
You were right the patch was indeed included.
I get confused because I had directory
/proc/acpi
and thought I should have everything
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
... and there is some other fun stuff too...
...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
That's useless if you don't have the disks capable of that. Here, in
UDMA100 or
Gwenole Beauchesne kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Maanantai 13 Lokakuu
2003 14:45):
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
... and there is some other fun stuff
Svetoslav Slavtchev kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Maanantai 13 Lokakuu
2003 18:07):
[..]
%changelog
* Sun Oct 12 2003 Thomas Backlund ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk
- acx 0.2.0pre3
- cifs 0.9.4cvs
- ieee1394 rev 1073
- mod_dvb 1.0.1
that didn't come from me :-)
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 12:35, Thomas Backlund wrote:
- fix bug in BadRAM marking all highmem bad (svetljo)
Thanks for including this patch. I just compiled the i686up4GB kernel
and can confirm that the kernel now again utilizes memory over 1GB
properly. Before, it always claimed that ~2700MB of
Oliver Lemke kirjoitti viestissn (lhetysaika Maanantai 13 Lokakuu 2003
18:40):
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 12:35, Thomas Backlund wrote:
- fix bug in BadRAM marking all highmem bad (svetljo)
Thanks for including this patch. I just compiled the i686up4GB kernel
and can confirm that the kernel now
Gwenole Beauchesne ha scritto:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
That's useless if you don't have the disks capable of
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
... and there is some other fun stuff
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
... and there is some other fun
21 matches
Mail list logo
