Reinhard Katzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> It's important to include ld-linux.so.1 with the next 7.2 update or
> you surely get complains for the Wordperfect 8 case (isn't this even
> included in the professional version of Mandrake 7.1 ?)
"Chmouel is fixing it" (c) myself
--
Gui
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > and it gave me no answer for ld-linux.so.1 in current cooker.
> Yes Chmouel has to fix it.
it's already corrected and uploaded..
--
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
Paris, France
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 06:41:23PM -0400, pgeorges wrote:
> Reinhard Katzmann a écrit :
>
> > Where is ld-linux.so.1 ? This should belong to the libc
> > package but it's not in there, so WordPerfect8 from 1998
> > (binary only), one of the better Word Processors which I
> > need for daily w
pgeorges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Reinhard Katzmann a écrit :
>
> > Where is ld-linux.so.1 ? This should belong to the libc
> > package but it's not in there, so WordPerfect8 from 1998
> > (binary only), one of the better Word Processors which I
> > need for daily work does no longer run. I
Reinhard Katzmann a écrit :
> Where is ld-linux.so.1 ? This should belong to the libc
> package but it's not in there, so WordPerfect8 from 1998
> (binary only), one of the better Word Processors which I
> need for daily work does no longer run. I'm using a maybe
> one or two weeks old cooker upd
Hi!
I did not find any answer to this in the mail archive,
so I ask again:
Where is ld-linux.so.1 ? This should belong to the libc
package but it's not in there, so WordPerfect8 from 1998
(binary only), one of the better Word Processors which I
need for daily work does no longer run. I'm using a
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:20:44PM -0400, pgeorges wrote:
> I had the same problem, and after a massive rpm -ivh --force /cooker/*,
> nobody complains
> any longer about the missing /lib/libdl.so.1 : I guess it is really
> deprecated.
But what about non-mandrake binaries, without source?
Is th
Jan Niehusmann a écrit :
>
> I have some old binaries that don't run on current cooker because
> /lib/ld-linux.so.1 and /lib/libdl.so.1 are missing. After copying them
> to /lib from some older installation, everything works.
>
> Are they in some compatiblity package that I didn't find?
> Or are
I have some old binaries that don't run on current cooker because
/lib/ld-linux.so.1 and /lib/libdl.so.1 are missing. After copying them
to /lib from some older installation, everything works.
Are they in some compatiblity package that I didn't find?
Or are those old (1998) binaries officially
