Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > another thought about a minimum install: > > > > why do I need to switch CDs in a minimum install...?? > > (rute-0.3.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm is on the Ext-CD) > > rute is installed in minimum install?? i lowered

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-07 Thread Christian Bricart
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:27:11PM +0200, Pixel wrote: > Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > another thought about a minimum install: > > > > why do I need to switch CDs in a minimum install...?? > > (rute-0.3.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm is on the Ext-CD) > > rute is installed in minimum

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > another thought about a minimum install: > > why do I need to switch CDs in a minimum install...?? > (rute-0.3.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm is on the Ext-CD) yes, rute as a big importance in english-language installs. gonna fix that. warly, i think this is

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-07 Thread Pixel
Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > another thought about a minimum install: > > why do I need to switch CDs in a minimum install...?? > (rute-0.3.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm is on the Ext-CD) rute is installed in minimum install?? i lowered its value a few days ago. Maybe you have an older v

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-07 Thread Christian Bricart
another thought about a minimum install: why do I need to switch CDs in a minimum install...?? (rute-0.3.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm is on the Ext-CD) Could this please be relocated to the Inst-CD in the final release..? Thanks Christian -- Things that make you go "Hmmm": "If a train station is w

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-07 Thread Pixel
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You'll get about 180MB of pretty basic packages. > I went in and installed about 20-30 more packages > by hand, and had everything I needed for an > internal server here at work. if you have packages you would like not to be installed, give them! :)

RE: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-07 Thread Don Head
>>> It's more than 54MB, though. It's actually >>> closer to 180MB, with around 140 packages. >>> Going >> >> well, it depends on the skill/class. >> >> did you try expert/workstation > > is that 180mb installed or total rpm size if > its installed size then could you give me a > list of the co

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-06 Thread Robert L Martin
> It's more than 54MB, though. It's actually > closer to 180MB, with around 140 packages. Going well, it depends on the skill/class. did you try expert/workstation - is that 180mb installed or total rpm size if its installed s

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-05 Thread Pixel
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's more than 54MB, though. It's actually > closer to 180MB, with around 140 packages. Going well, it depends on the skill/class. did you try expert/workstation?

RE: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-05 Thread Don Head
>> runlevel. I tried 3, and it didn't budge. Oh >> well, no big deal. > > this of course not the way it should be ;) Nope. And a second try after another rsync revealed the that problem was on my end. I had a few bad packages (apparently I got bitten by the rsync bug). So.. it works. I did

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-05 Thread Pixel
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > runlevel. I tried 3, and it didn't budge. Oh > well, no big deal. this of course not the way it should be ;)

RE: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-05 Thread Don Head
> In expert, if you choose server, the minimum, > you get base + MAKEDEV at fetchmail file ftp > glibc hexedit ipchains ld.so libnet mailx > mirrordir mkinitrd mkxauth netkit-base pam > portmap pwdb routed rsh rsync samba sharutils > slocate tcp_wrappers telnet-server urpmi vlock I trie

Re: [Cooker] minimum install tarball?

2000-09-03 Thread Pixel
Robert L Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ii challenge > any Mandrake Employee to give me step by step on how to install Mandrake > on a Zip 250 (base + x + net + any WM) - throw away Mandrake/mdkinst (if you have more than > 32MB, and XF86_FB is working, no pb) - choose your RPMS in Mandra

[Cooker] minimum install tarball?

2000-09-03 Thread Robert L Martin
for those of us with an existing ext2 partition could maybe the install disc just drop a tarball with the base system on it? so what if fstab is broken (boot disk anyone?) and you have just a drum beat primitive system (include an ncurses front end to RPM and im happy). Ii challenge any Mandrake E

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-03 Thread Pixel
Pelon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With such a base there is no need for an option > for it in the installer. But it would be very > convenient to be able to choose the base and X > Windows, for example. Or base + kernel > development. in fact, you can't install the 54MB without cheating. In ev

Re: [Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-02 Thread Pelon
On Sat, 02 Sep 2000, Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > basesystem and its dependencies is now 54MB :) Those who have older drives with limited space understand the argument for such a minimal install. But there are also some of us who are plain old control freaks. We want to know every package

[Cooker] minimum install

2000-09-02 Thread Pixel
basesystem and its dependencies is now 54MB :)