On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:24:37 +0100 (MET)
Marcio Cordero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a short note:
as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be
gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (since
it doesn't seem
to be in dev anymore) and use napshare
SuSE proved that you can make a 6 CD Linux distro. Why cut Mandrake
down? (Not that I want to download 6 .iso files.)
Marcio Cordero wrote:
Just a short note:
as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be
gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped
1. SuSE doesn't allow to download the 6 CDs anyway,
2. If you check the last time it was updated, you'll see that gtk-gnutella
wasn't updated for over one year and a half. Long development cycle :-). If
you compare those two, you'll get the feeling that napshare took gtk-gnutella's
source and
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:24:37 +0100 (MET)
Marcio Cordero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a short note:
as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be
gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (since
it doesn't seem
to be in dev anymore) and use napshare
Just a short note:
as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be
gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (since it doesn't seem
to be in dev anymore) and use napshare instead? The same applies to gsx, it
doesn't seem to be in development anymore. Maybe
