Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 13:57 schrieb Buchan Milne:
David Coe wrote:
Steffen Barszus wrote:
pro-linux reports that rc1 nay be the last rc before final version.
This is the same site that had the bad review of 9.1?
Jep, It is the same site. Only if you use debian or better gentoo and
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 14:24 schrieb Guillaume Cottenceau:
David Coe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoted from the top-right corner of
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ which also was hurriedly
corrected yesterday to remove reference to RC2. More haste less
speed :-)
Argh, an error from
On Friday 29 August 2003 10:25 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Keller wrote:
Copy of the reply I got from Bob, since it didn't go to the list:
On Friday 29 August 2003 08:45 am, John Keller wrote:
w9ya wrote:
I think that the Wiki serves an
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, w9ya wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2003 10:25 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
Copy of the reply I got from Bob, since it didn't go to the list:
snip
Bob, you are free to ask for write access to the Wiki, and CHANGE IT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All I have seen coming from this
Steffen Barszus wrote:
pro-linux reports that rc1 nay be the last rc before final version. Is
that true ? I haven't read anything about that and don't know where
they got that information from. A typical pro-linux misinformation ?
Quoted from the top-right corner of
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:02 am, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi !
pro-linux reports that rc1 nay be the last rc before final version. Is
that true ? I haven't read anything about that and don't know where
they got that information from. A typical pro-linux misinformation ?
regards
Steffen
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 12:19, w9ya wrote:
1 - Config files for pcmcia-wlan are reported to be messed up. This is *not*
Uh? Reported where? I missed this...
--
adamw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Coe wrote:
Steffen Barszus wrote:
pro-linux reports that rc1 nay be the last rc before final version.
This is the same site that had the bad review of 9.1?
Is
that true ? I haven't read anything about that and don't know where
they got
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 13:57 schrieb Buchan Milne:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Coe wrote:
Steffen Barszus wrote:
pro-linux reports that rc1 nay be the last rc before final
version.
This is the same site that had the bad review of 9.1?
Jep, and I don't like
From: w9ya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:02 am, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi !
pro-linux reports that rc1 nay be the last rc before final version. Is
that true ? I haven't read anything about that and don't know where
they got that information from. A typical pro-linux
Well
I can confirm they are messed up.
Since my last update my D-link pcmcia card stop working properly...
iwconfig show there is there but no HW address...for example.
Bernard
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 12:19, w9ya wrote:
1 - Config files for pcmcia-wlan are reported
On Friday 29 August 2003 06:45 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 12:19, w9ya wrote:
1 - Config files for pcmcia-wlan are reported to be messed up. This is
*not*
Uh? Reported where? I missed this...
Here ! (Several messages/bug reports)
Um, btw, the ifplugd dying stuff
On Friday 29 August 2003 07:11 am, Thomas Backlund wrote:
From: w9ya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:02 am, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi !
pro-linux reports that rc1 nay be the last rc before final version. Is
that true ? I haven't read anything about that and don't know
David Coe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoted from the top-right corner of
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ which also was hurriedly
corrected yesterday to remove reference to RC2. More haste less
speed :-)
Argh, an error from our webmasters. Reported. Thanks.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
w9ya wrote:
No comments on wikis. Or maybe better put; I had better not waste
everyones
time on my impressions of wikis.
Yes, since a lot of others realise the benefits, and contribute,
regardless of the extra effort required to write good
w9ya wrote:
No comments on wikis. Or maybe better put; I had better not waste
everyones
time on my impressions of wikis. In any event; I think the timetable
*needs*
to reiterated on the mailing list as milestones approach as stuff on a
wiki
is easily missed.
I think that the Wiki serves an
Copy of the reply I got from Bob, since it didn't go to the list:
On Friday 29 August 2003 08:45 am, John Keller wrote:
w9ya wrote:
No comments on wikis. Or maybe better put; I had better not waste
everyones
time on my impressions of wikis. In any event; I think the timetable
*needs*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Keller wrote:
Copy of the reply I got from Bob, since it didn't go to the list:
On Friday 29 August 2003 08:45 am, John Keller wrote:
w9ya wrote:
I think that the Wiki serves an important role in presenting information
that might normally be
On Friday 29 August 2003 10:42 am, w9ya wrote:
Actually, ALL email programs I am aware of can deal with this just fine. I
have considered changing them, but most emailing lists I subscribe to
replace
that field on incoming messages to the reflector itself. I need this setting
for other work.
19 matches
Mail list logo
