Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug

2002-07-29 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Danny Tholen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The problem being that it breaks the dependencies closure :-(. > > > > eh..closure? > > a lexical closure is a function with a map from variable names to hmm, we were not talking about closure in pro

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug

2002-07-29 Thread Danny Tholen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 29 July 2002 16:09, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > The problem being that it breaks the dependencies closure :-(. eh..closure? The bug is when the packages do not depend on each other. even completly unrelated packages do not get installed

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug

2002-07-29 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Danny Tholen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed that when one of the selected (for install) packages is bad or unreadable, > rpmdrake often draws the conclusion that all of the packages are bad. > I think it is because it does an rpm2header on all the files, and if it gets an error > it adds

RE: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug

2002-07-29 Thread Tech At Mathco Dot Com
ooker] rpmdrake bug You're right, it's a silly bug. But don't forget about /var/cache/urpmi/rpms. Austin On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 09:29, Tech At Mathco Dot Com wrote: > Would it not be better if rpmdrake > would see.. ok.. this package is bad > but the others aren't and

RE: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug

2002-07-29 Thread Austin Acton
You're right, it's a silly bug. But don't forget about /var/cache/urpmi/rpms. Austin On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 09:29, Tech At Mathco Dot Com wrote: > Would it not be better if rpmdrake > would see.. ok.. this package is bad > but the others aren't and give the user > a choise to still install the ot

RE: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug

2002-07-29 Thread Tech At Mathco Dot Com
it is bad. Its not allways it keeps it in the cache. Then you have to start all over again. /MattB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Danny Tholen Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug -

[Cooker] rpmdrake bug

2002-07-29 Thread Danny Tholen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I noticed that when one of the selected (for install) packages is bad or unreadable, rpmdrake often draws the conclusion that all of the packages are bad. I think it is because it does an rpm2header on all the files, and if it gets an error it adds al

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake bug ?

2002-04-26 Thread Stéphane Teletchéa
Le Vendredi 26 Avril 2002 16:28, Stéphane Teletchéa a écrit : > I'm planning to save disk space, so i 'm concentrating all the images > trough a local server. > After this, i export the directory, and i mount this directory locally via > NFS, and these isos on a local separate directory (mount ...

[Cooker] rpmdrake bug ?

2002-04-26 Thread Stéphane Teletchéa
I'm planning to save disk space, so i 'm concentrating all the images trough a local server. After this, i export the directory, and i mount this directory locally via NFS, and these isos on a local separate directory (mount ... -o loop). When i add these directories with rpmdrake, it works fine