Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4) On the package selection screen, after toggling to
flat mode and hitting the Floppy button I noticed a
few things. First the screen is a mess. It looks
like the header part of the window is too short,
there's some image in the top left that looks
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 04:53, David Walser wrote:
2) License Agreement, Refuse is selected by
default
o_O
i don't think this will change, sorry :-/
Ok, I just thought it was weird. It'll probably throw
a lot of people off, but whatever.
My guess is this may be a sort-of legal
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 04:53, David Walser wrote:
My guess is this may be a sort-of legal thing...I've seen other programs
do it, and my guess is some lawyer somewhere in the shadowy world of
software licensing decided it'd make a difference if the user had to
make
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Font face in the active part of the installation
program is pretty inconsistent. It's spotty and very
faded in spots.
?
Is it possible to do screenshots if the install
doesn't finish? Something onto a floppy maybe?
for screenshots, 2
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:08:20 -0800 (PST)
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange, how does one reproduce the problem exactly?
I have a user that's only in LDAP and I can ssh to
them just fine.
On my system, setting 'ssl on' or 'ssl start_tls' in
/etc/ldap.conf causes ssh (or sshd) to
--- Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:08:20 -0800 (PST)
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange, how does one reproduce the problem
exactly?
I have a user that's only in LDAP and I can ssh to
them just fine.
On my system, setting 'ssl on' or 'ssl
David Walser wrote:
--- Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:08:20 -0800 (PST)
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange, how does one reproduce the problem
exactly?
I have a user that's only in LDAP and I can ssh to
them just fine.
On my system, setting 'ssl
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
i didn't receive this mail, thanks David to gave a link to the
archive... otherwise i wouldn't have belive it really was posted :-(
1) Font face in the active part of the installation
program is pretty inconsistent. It's spotty and very
faded in
--- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
i didn't receive this mail, thanks David to gave a
link to the
archive... otherwise i wouldn't have belive it
really was posted :-(
1) Font face in the active part of the
installation
program is pretty
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:06:42 -0700
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you have ssl start_tls do the usual getent
passwd or getent
shadow and such work?
getent passwd works, getent shadow does not (well, it
lists the used in /etc/shadow, but not the ones in ldap).
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:50:28 -0500
Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:06:42 -0700
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you have ssl start_tls do the usual getent
passwd or getent
shadow and such work?
getent passwd works, getent shadow does not (well, it
On Mon Jan 27, 2003 at 11:02:49AM -0500, Brian Smith wrote:
When you have ssl start_tls do the usual getent
passwd or getent
shadow and such work?
getent passwd works, getent shadow does not (well, it
lists the used in /etc/shadow, but not the ones in ldap).
Err, that's incorrect. I
On Mon Jan 27, 2003 at 12:53:00PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote:
[...]
Let me do some digging... this is starting to ring some bells. I bet
if you do an strace on ssh (as a user in the LDAP database), you'll see
it accessing /etc/shadow directly, and *not* using getent to retrieve
that
--- Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon Jan 27, 2003 at 11:40:11AM -0700, Vincent
Danen wrote:
[...]
Let me do some digging... this is starting to ring
some bells. I bet
if you do an strace on ssh (as a user in the LDAP
database), you'll see
it accessing /etc/shadow
On Mon Jan 27, 2003 at 03:08:20PM -0800, David Walser wrote:
[...]
Ok... if you do an strace on ssh, and then search
the output, you'll
see something like this:
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY) = 3
... (much repeated, my strace shows 6 similar calls)
So ssh, the client, is looking
Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Weird. The machine bgmilne, is it set to query it's own ldap database?
Yes, but it was giving referrals, which might have influenced it, but:
[bgmilne@bgmilne bgmilne]$ grep ^host /etc/ldap.conf
host localhost
And on our ldap master (runs 9.0):
[bgmilne@hercules
Hey guys, I had ssh start crapping out on me recently, but I was able to fix
it by changing ssl start_tls to ssl on. With start_tls, ssh segfaults if
run by a user who's not in /etc/passwd, and sshd segfaults if you try to
login as a user not in /etc/passwd.
Other problems I've seen with ldap
On Fri Jan 24, 2003 at 09:05:57PM -0600, Brian Smith wrote:
Hey guys, I had ssh start crapping out on me recently, but I was able to fix
it by changing ssl start_tls to ssl on. With start_tls, ssh segfaults if
run by a user who's not in /etc/passwd, and sshd segfaults if you try to
login
Another nice LDAP related buglet. On a cooker machine that's running
slapd (openldap-servers) the sshd won't work properly.
It's easy to reproduce (I've done it on 2 machines):
[root@taz root]# service ldap start
ldaps
Starting slapd (ldap + ldaps): [ OK ]
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Another nice LDAP related buglet. On a cooker machine that's running
slapd (openldap-servers) the sshd won't work properly.
It's easy to reproduce (I've done it on 2 machines):
[root@taz root]# service ldap start
ldaps
Starting slapd (ldap +
Another nice LDAP related buglet. On a cooker machine that's running
slapd (openldap-servers) the sshd won't work properly.
It's easy to reproduce (I've done it on 2 machines):
[root@taz root]# service ldap start
ldaps
Starting slapd (ldap + ldaps): [ OK ]
21 matches
Mail list logo
