Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I run urpmi --auto-select --auto --keep urpmi tells me that the rpm
packages have faulty signatures. When I run urpmi /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/*.rpm
the packages are installed without any problems.
The faulty signature is in fact a missing signature
When I run urpmi --auto-select --auto --keep urpmi tells me that the
rpm packages have faulty signatures. When I run urpmi
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/*.rpm the packages are installed without any
problems.
# urpmi.update -aurpmi --auto-select --auto --keep;date
undersöker MD5SUM-fil
[SNIP]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lamikr]# urpmi --auto-select --no-verify-rpm
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
drakconf-9.2-4mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied harddrake-ui = 9.2-6mdk)
harddrake-9.2-11mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied drakxtools-newt == 9.2-11mdk)
Le Mercredi 17 Septembre 2003 09:37, lamikr_mdk a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lamikr]# urpmi --auto-select --no-verify-rpm
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
drakconf-9.2-4mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied harddrake-ui = 9.2-6mdk)
harddrake-9.2-11mdk.i586 (due to
installation de
//var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk.i586.rpm
Préparation...
##
L'installation a échoué:
file /etc/rc.d/init.d/kheader from install of
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk conflicts with file from
Pascal Terjan wrote:
installation de
//var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk.i586.rpm
Préparation... ##
L'installation a échoué:
file /etc/rc.d/init.d/kheader from install of
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 22:28:14 +0200
Pascal Terjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A conflict between bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk and initscripts =
7.06-23mdk would solve that.
I had suggested a prereq in bootloader utils for initscripts =
7.06-21mdk, since the conflict only occurs because
On Friday 05 September 2003 04:52 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 22:28:14 +0200
Pascal Terjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A conflict between bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk and initscripts =
7.06-23mdk would solve that.
I had suggested a prereq in bootloader utils for
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to run urpmi.update -a first. However, it may have simply been that
updates were simply
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 10:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to run urpmi.update -a first.
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
Really it should give a message of some sort,
Bellegarde Cedric [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
fixed in urpmi-4.4-29mdk.
François.
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 10:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if
there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
When I use urpmi to install a downloaded RPM, I get the replly that the
file is already installed, but rpm -Uvh installs the RPM without problem:
# urpmi libgnome2-2.3.0-2mdk.i586.rpm
allt är redan installerat
^--- swedish for everything is already installed
# rpm -Uvh
Hello,
# urpmi --update
Can't call method filename on an undefined value at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/urpm.pm line 1726.
?
I realize from the manpage that it's only half of the command line it expects,
however, it should tell it me nicely, not with PERL error message :)
# rpm -qa |
I had both ftp.sunsite and ftp.sunet as sources for main and as contrib
and contrb1.
When updating from only 1 of the 2, updates are properly shown But also
listed are same named from /var/lib/urpmi for 2nd site.
Case in point was from this morning
[root@localhost charles]# urpmi.update
Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had both ftp.sunsite and ftp.sunet as sources for main and as contrib
and contrb1.
When updating from only 1 of the 2, updates are properly shown But also
listed are same named from /var/lib/urpmi for 2nd site.
Case in point was from this
On 31 May 2002 16:10:52 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
Can you switch (as workaround) using --media ... options, it is
problematic to fix it on urpmi as switching to lower interface is to
be done currently.
Easily done.
I have 2 only in case my primary is down/overlaoded
bor@cooker% rpm -q urpmi rpmtools
urpmi-3.2-1mdk
rpmtools-4.0-5mdk
bor@cooker% sudo urpmi.update -a
copying source hdlist (or synthesis) of Installation CD...
...copying done
copying source hdlist (or synthesis) of Contrib CD...
...copying done
examining whole urpmi database
examining hdlist file
On 31 Aug 2001 10:36:57 +0200, François Pons wrote:
Mark Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
the media, and re-added it, and still get the same thing.
Mark Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
the media, and re-added it, and still get the same thing.
unable to parse correctly
starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
the media, and re-added it, and still get the same thing.
unable to parse correctly [/var/lib/urpmi/hdlist.Cooker.cz]
...
package
The package "compat-glibc-5.3-2.0.7.5mdk.i586.rpm" is giving urpmi a
headache when deciding whether to install it or not. On my system:
Name: compat-glibc Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 5.3 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release :
24 matches
Mail list logo