Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes

2003-08-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What do people think? As long as kernel team remains silent about anything I do - your hack looks like the simplest solution. (Sorry, cleaning my inbox and noticing this) Ok so I'm adding the hack in mount.c. Now, is it a good thing to add

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-20 Thread Michael Scherer
IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing not sure of that, if i have an option that has a meaning, and it changes name (for whatever reason) I'd like to be notified early, not having to hunt problem for an option that was ignored. the kernel should ignore,

double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunately, double clicking on an rpm on a CD still gives some problem Because of Windows-only CD that leads to all files being executable? I have a suggestion for that, because I've been dealing with fixing a similar problem for a friend of

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Pixel
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pixel do you think we can add mode=0644 for cd and dvd drives, in the install, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c? no pb. IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pixel do you think we can add mode=0644 for cd and dvd drives, in the install, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c? no pb. IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes

2003-06-19 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
I think the best solution would be to extend fstab syntax so that in auto fs, we can specify options for only one fs, but I think this is somewhat complicated and will introduce incompatibility in a basic file such as /etc/fstab. So I've finally fixed my fix by extending mount.c capability,

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re:[Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes

2003-06-19 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
Le jeu 19/06/2003 à 12:25, Andrey Borzenkov a écrit : The right solution is to add support for external helper and query it for mount options for a given device/fstype. That's a great idea ! - do something sensible when device could not be mounted. the please insert CD dialog that

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re:[Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes

2003-06-19 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
Le jeu 19/06/2003 à 15:42, FACORAT Fabrice a écrit : Le jeu 19/06/2003 à 12:25, Andrey Borzenkov a écrit : The right solution is to add support for external helper and query it for mount options for a given device/fstype. This helper should not interact. In fact it's the responsability

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker]rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Luca Berra
Pixel wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pixel do you think we can add mode=0644 for cd and dvd drives, in the install, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c? no pb. IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing not sure of that, if i have

Re: double-clicking on files directly from CD's [was: Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake and newbies: they sometimes miss *installed* software]

2003-06-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing not sure of that, if i have an option that has a meaning, and it changes name (for whatever reason) I'd like to be notified early, not having to hunt problem for an option that was