"Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What do people think?
>
> As long as kernel team remains silent about anything I do - your hack
> looks like the simplest solution.
(Sorry, cleaning my inbox and noticing this)
Ok so I'm adding the hack in mount.c.
Now, is it a good thing to a
> > IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of
> > failing
>
> not sure of that, if i have an option that has a meaning, and it
> changes name (for whatever reason) I'd like to be notified early, not
> having to hunt problem for an option that was ignored.
the kernel should igno
Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of
> > failing
>
> not sure of that, if i have an option that has a meaning, and it
> changes name (for whatever reason) I'd like to be notified early,
> not having to hunt problem for an option t
Pixel wrote:
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pixel do you think we can add mode=0644 for cd and dvd drives, in
the install, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c?
no pb.
IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing
not sure of that, if i have
Le jeu 19/06/2003 à 15:42, FACORAT Fabrice a écrit :
> Le jeu 19/06/2003 à 12:25, Andrey Borzenkov a écrit :
>
> > The right solution is to add support for external helper and query it
> > for mount options for a given device/fstype.
> This helper should not interact. In fact
> it's the responsa
Le jeu 19/06/2003 à 12:25, Andrey Borzenkov a écrit :
> The right solution is to add support for external helper and query it
> for mount options for a given device/fstype.
That's a great idea !
> - do something sensible when device could not be mounted. the
> "please insert CD" dialog that w
> I think the best solution would be to extend fstab syntax so that
> in "auto" fs, we can specify options for only one fs, but I think
> this is somewhat complicated and will introduce incompatibility
> in a basic file such as /etc/fstab. So I've finally fixed my fix
> by extending mount.c capabi
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Pixel do you think we can add mode=0644 for cd and dvd drives, in
> > the install, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c?
>
> no pb.
>
> IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pixel do you think we can add mode=0644 for cd and dvd drives, in
> the install, with the above mentioned addition in mount.c?
no pb.
IMO the kernel should ignore unrecognized options instead of failing
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, double clicking on an rpm on a CD still gives some
> problem
Because of Windows-only CD that leads to all files being
executable?
I have a suggestion for that, because I've been dealing with
fixing a similar problem for a friend of m
10 matches
Mail list logo
