On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 09:34 PM, J. Greenlees wrote:
( ... trying to convince these Tallahassee folks that 50 F. is NOT
cold ... )
if you from the east side of the rockies you are right Jay,
but here in the lower mainland, that is darn near polar. ~l~
Vancouver barely hits 32 F in mid
On Monday 09 December 2002 05:47 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 17:44, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > parag shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > You may live in a very huge planet to have a GMT offset of
> > > > > 530 Ho
Jay DeKing wrote:
On Monday 09 December 2002 05:47 pm, Austin Acton honored me with this
communique:
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 17:44, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
parag shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You may live in a very huge planet to have
On Monday 09 December 2002 05:47 pm, Austin Acton honored me with this
communique:
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 17:44, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > parag shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > You may live in a very huge planet to have a GMT
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 17:44, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > parag shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > > You may live in a very huge planet to have a GMT offset of 530 Hours ;)
> > > It is 5 hrs 30 mins :)) i suppose only time zone that
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> parag shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > You may live in a very huge planet to have a GMT offset of 530 Hours ;)
> > It is 5 hrs 30 mins :)) i suppose only time zone that doesnt fall on hour
> > boundry!!
>
> your mail pretends to have b
parag shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You may live in a very huge planet to have a GMT offset of 530 Hours ;)
> It is 5 hrs 30 mins :)) i suppose only time zone that doesnt fall on hour
> boundry!!
your mail pretends to have been written on Jan-9-2003 whereas
we're currently on Dec-9-2003.
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Lea Gris wrote:
OOps fixed it now :) thx for pointing that out!!
> parag shah wrote:
> > urpmi postfix
> > installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/postfix-1.1.12-1mdk.i586.rpm
> >
> > Installation failed:
> > openssl >= 0.9.6h is needed by postfix-1.1.12-1mdk
parag shah wrote:
urpmi postfix
installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/postfix-1.1.12-1mdk.i586.rpm
Installation failed:
openssl >= 0.9.6h is needed by postfix-1.1.12-1mdk
[root@mama var]# urpmi timemachine
pas de paquetage nommé timemachine
DOH !?
Your posting date is:
Date: Thu,
