Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)]

2000-09-11 Thread Steve Fox
I think simply keeping up with Helix's patches is good enough. Helix obviously doesn't consider Mandrake important enough (which doesn't surprise me as they've almost all moved over to Debian). They are too lazy to make multiple spec files. John Grange wrote: Well i guess we got our answre,

Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)]

2000-09-11 Thread John Grange
Steve Fox wrote: I think simply keeping up with Helix's patches is good enough. Helix obviously doesn't consider Mandrake important enough (which doesn't surprise me as they've almost all moved over to Debian). They are too lazy to make multiple spec files. I was under the impression that

Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)]

2000-09-11 Thread frank
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, John Grange wrote: that is simply lazy that is for sure if we can keep up with them there is NO reason that they can not make it in the first place they are keeping up with how many different distribs?? i'd guess that the folks at helix are far too busy writing press

RE: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)]

2000-09-11 Thread Franck Martin
, September 12, 2000 4:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)] On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, John Grange wrote: that is simply lazy that is for sure if we can keep up with them there is NO reason that they can not make it in the first place

RE: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)]

2000-09-11 Thread Jason Donkin
: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] [Fwd: [HC Hello] Mandrake helix-gnome rpms;)] On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, John Grange wrote: that is simply lazy that is for sure if we can keep up with them there is NO reason that they can not make it in the first place