Claudio wrote:
Just a simple question: is Cooker's tree exactly the next 8.1? I mean: if I
install Cooker, am I testing for 8.1 or something else?
Thanks, C.
I don't know, but as I have downloaded and burnt
FREQ 3 ISOs last week, such a quick release of 8.1 beta
doesn't make me happy at
:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [Cooker] Cooker = 8.1beta?
aniere@genoscop
e.cns.fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried CD-RW supports? I am converted to these since 6 months, no
more tons of CDs in my desk
I use them a lot for other purpose. I keep versions on
regular CDs, just to have them in case of need later.
In fact, I think that Mandrake should not have
In fact, I think that Mandrake should not have released
freq3 and 8.1 beta 1 so near, or they could at least have
warned people before. I know someone who broke his system
with freq3 and spent hours to make it work again, and
he's very angry too because he would have prefered to
wait for
Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
I agree and disagree. They should not release Freq3 because the system
was in awful shape at this moment. Actually, they probably should wait
with beta1 until RPM and rpmdrake problems are resolved (RPM in any
case). OTOH anybody testing snapshots should be prepared
On Aug 20 2001, 14:20 +, Franck Aniere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried CD-RW supports? I am converted to these since 6 months, no
more tons of CDs in my desk
I use them a lot for other purpose. I keep versions on
regular CDs, just to have them in case of need
Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In fact, I think that Mandrake should not have released
freq3 and 8.1 beta 1 so near, or they could at least have
warned people before. I know someone who broke his system
with freq3 and spent hours to make it work again, and
he's very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried CD-RW supports? I am converted to these since 6 months, no
more tons of CDs in my desk
there's a big trap ahead, which is that most CD-RWs cannot be
reliably read by CD-ROM drives. The industry is a wakeup to this
problem and the Society for Optical
P == Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P ... I couldn't agree more. I also only have a 56k
P dialup and am never likely to have a faster connection, so I'm
P in the same boat as you - two to three cookers rsync'd a week
P at best.
Add my +1 to this proposal --- it's the
So sprach »Claudio« am 2001-08-18 um 13:35:06 +0200 :
Just a simple question: is Cooker's tree exactly the next 8.1? I mean: if I
install Cooker, am I testing for 8.1 or something else?
You're testing 8.2 with Cooker. If you want to test 8.1, install 8.1
Beta.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sprach »Claudio« am 2001-08-18 um 13:35:06 +0200 :
Just a simple question: is Cooker's tree exactly the next 8.1? I mean: if I
install Cooker, am I testing for 8.1 or something else?
You're testing 8.2 with Cooker. If you want to test 8.1,
On Saturday 18 August 2001 16:38, Pixel wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sprach »Claudio« am 2001-08-18 um 13:35:06 +0200 :
Just a simple question: is Cooker's tree exactly the next 8.1? I mean:
if I install Cooker, am I testing for 8.1 or something else?
You're
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sprach »Claudio« am 2001-08-18 um 13:35:06 +0200 :
Just a simple question: is Cooker's tree exactly the next 8.1? I mean: if I
install Cooker, am I testing for 8.1 or
8/18/01 11:33:46 AM, Kelley Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People have been known to burn and mail beta's around here...
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sprach »Claudio« am 2001-08-18 um 13:35:06 +0200 :
On Saturday 18 August 2001 19:33, Kelley Terry wrote:
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sprach »Claudio« am 2001-08-18 um 13:35:06 +0200 :
Just a simple question: is Cooker's tree exactly the next 8.1?
15 matches
Mail list logo
