Re: [Cooker] Grub segfault...

2003-08-17 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD
On Saturday 16 August 2003 03:58 pm, Jay DeKing wrote: > On Friday 15 August 2003 4:17 am, Gregoire Favre honored me with this > > communique: > > Hello, > > > > I have installed the new GRUB yesterday, and I didn't notice a problem, > > know at boot, all I can see is: "GRUB". > > I had the same pr

Re: [Cooker] Grub segfault...

2003-08-16 Thread Jay DeKing
On Friday 15 August 2003 4:17 am, Gregoire Favre honored me with this communique: > Hello, > > I have installed the new GRUB yesterday, and I didn't notice a problem, > know at boot, all I can see is: "GRUB". > I had the same problem. Neither of my boot floppies worked either (yes, they have the

Re: [Cooker] Grub menu not correct in rc2

2002-09-12 Thread Pixel
Stéphane Teletchéa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And the map (0x81) (0x80) command doesn't work : grub doesn't boot, and grub > shell is invocated instead of booting the windows partition. > > I manually change it and it works (but as it windows sees two partitions). > > title windows > map (

Re: [Cooker] Grub and NVIDIA question

2002-04-13 Thread gabor farkas
i heve a nvidia tnt2 32mb card, and i'm using mandrake82 ( with some cooker updates ) and two days ago i switched from lilo to grub... and grub works without problems...in text mode.. bye gabor On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:28:25PM -0400, Denis Pelletier wrote: > Hello, > > Is anyone using grub

Re: [Cooker] Grub and NVIDIA question

2002-04-12 Thread Danny Tholen
I think I saw the same when i used grub a few months ago. Very slow drawing of the menu. But then, my NVIDIA system is strange anyway. All kernels, exept when compiled with VGA 16 or RIVA framebuffer do not show _anything at all_ on screen. Lilo shows up ok, even in graphical mode, than it sets

Re: [Cooker] grub install is trashy

2002-03-03 Thread Pixel
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 01:47, Pixel wrote: > > Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > grub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 > > > p (hdgrub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) > > > (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (

Re: [Cooker] grub install is trashy

2002-03-03 Thread Quel Qun
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 01:47, Pixel wrote: > Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > grub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 > > p (hdgrub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) > > (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (hd1grub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d > > (h

Re: [Cooker] grub install is trashy

2002-03-03 Thread Pixel
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > grub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 > p (hdgrub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) > (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (hd1grub> install (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage1 d > (hd0) (hd1,4)/boot/grub/stage2 p (hd1grub> install > (hd

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-17 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
On Mon, 2001-09-17 at 16:51, Jay DeKing wrote: > >2 We can't use them at the same time > > ? We can not use them both ? > have you tried having 2-3 Linux distros ( or installations)+ FreeBSD on > the same mashine > can you install lilo on 2 places ? or on second drive

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-17 Thread Jay DeKing
> >2 We can't use them at the same time > > ? We can not use them both ? > have you tried having 2-3 Linux distros ( or installations)+ FreeBSD on > the same mashine > can you install lilo on 2 places ? or on second drive > why not lilo -> /dev/hda ->> lin-distroes,grub >gr

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-16 Thread svetljo
Yura Gusev wrote: >On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Hoyt wrote: > I think they(lilo and grub) need to provide bootloader so they can't be installed at the same time. And basesystem need to depend on bootloader so you need to install one of them. >>>And I am happy having both so I can play

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-16 Thread Yura Gusev
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Hoyt wrote: > > > I think they(lilo and grub) need to provide bootloader so they can't be > > > installed at the same time. And basesystem need to depend on bootloader > > > so you need to install one of them. > > > > And I am happy having both so I can play with both. > > Ha

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-16 Thread Hoyt
On Sunday 16 September 2001 02:33 am, you wrote: > Yura Gusev wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote: > >>yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen > >>on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer > >>on that machine to have grub. (

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-15 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
Yura Gusev wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote: > > >>yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen >>on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer >>on that machine to have grub. (yes, I know there is a text based lilo. >>On the mach

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-15 Thread Blue Lizard
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Yura Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Do we really need grub? I think lilo works just fine. >> > > grub is better but less friendly. > > > agreed. better in some respects as far as say, command line editing, less need for repeated rebuilding, etc. Too bad

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-15 Thread Vincent Meyer
I agree. I don't know any reason why both are required. V.

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-15 Thread Yura Gusev
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote: > yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen > on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer > on that machine to have grub. (yes, I know there is a text based lilo. > On the machine the pretty one works

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-15 Thread Vincent Meyer
yeah, we really need grub. While I use Lilo with the pretty screen on my desktop, it doesn't display correctly on my laptop, and I prefer on that machine to have grub. (yes, I know there is a text based lilo. On the machine the pretty one works on, I like it, and so do my kids) Vinny

Re: [Cooker] grub

2001-09-15 Thread Yura Gusev
On 16 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Do we really need grub? I think lilo works just fine. > > grub is better but less friendly. OK if user wants grub thats ok. But i dont need 2 bootloaders installed by default. (basesystem depends on lilo and grub) -- 8:46pm up 22 days, 9:50, 3 u

Re: [Cooker] grub broken now? grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk

2001-04-19 Thread Yves Duret
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:45:47PM -0400, salane wrote: > rpm -q grub > grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk > It won't install by using control panel [..] > Error 31: File is not sector aligned It is not a grub problem but a ControlCenter bug.. it has been "fixed" by disabling the feature the time to correct t

Re: [Cooker] grub broken now? grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk

2001-04-18 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, salane wrote: > > >grub /dev/hda7 > grub> > setup --stage2=/boot/grub/stage2 --prefix=/grub (hd0,6) > Checking if "/grub/stage1" exists... yes > Checking if "/grub/stage2" exists... yes > Checking if "/grub/reiserfs_stage1_5" exists... yes > Running "install --stage2=/b

Re: [Cooker] grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk is missing docs

2001-04-03 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Pixel am Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:42:27PM +0200: > Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi! > > > > Is it right that the only available documentation for grub in > > grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk are the info/man pages? I've also installed the -doc > > subpackage, but this only conta

Re: [Cooker] grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk is missing docs

2001-04-03 Thread Pixel
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > Is it right that the only available documentation for grub in > grub-0.5.96.1-8mdk are the info/man pages? I've also installed the -doc > subpackage, but this only contains: > > /usr/share/doc/grub-doc-0.5.96.1 > /usr/share/doc/grub-doc-0.5

Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e why can't it be removed?)

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Ryan Little am Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:20:50AM -0500: > Why is Grub installed mandatory? If you try to unistall it it says it's > rewuired by basesystemthat's great but I use good ol liloperhaps > this dependency could be romoved.question though...since I'm using > LILO can I

Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e why can't it be removed?)

2001-03-29 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 03.30 Ryan Little wrote: > > Wish I could, take a look at this :( > [root@littlebox /root]# rpm -e --force grub > Macro %_install_langs has empty body > rpm: only installation, upgrading, rmsource and rmspec may be forced p... I will never get used to which one in used in each case. Try

Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e whycan't it be removed?)

2001-03-29 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Not sure about macro thing, but to forcefully remove a package, hvae to use: rpm -e --nodeps On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ryan Little wrote: > > Linux werewolf 2.4.2-ac28 #1 SMP Thu Mar 29 16:41:17 CEST 2001 i686 > > Wish I could, take a look at this :( > [root@littlebox /root]# rpm -e -

Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e why can't it be removed?)

2001-03-29 Thread Ryan Little
- Original Message - From: "J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 4:24 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e why can't it be removed?) > > On 03.29 R.I.P. Dead

Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e why can't it be removed?)

2001-03-29 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 03.29 R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > > This issue has been brought up before, and somebody (I forgot the name) > suggested that basesystem requires a virtual package called "bootloader" > or something like that instead of requiring both lilo and grub. And then > nobody followed up. Period. > It wa

Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e whycan't it be removed?)

2001-03-29 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
This issue has been brought up before, and somebody (I forgot the name) suggested that basesystem requires a virtual package called "bootloader" or something like that instead of requiring both lilo and grub. And then nobody followed up. Period. Abel Cheung On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ryan Little wr

Re: [Cooker] Grub fatal issues

2000-12-11 Thread Pixel
Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I upgraded to the grub-0.5.96.1-1mdk release yesterday and discovered that > it's fatal. Grub reports an incompability between stage1 and stage2. Ignore oops, forgotten to call it in %post, should be ok in grub-0.5.96-1.2mdk: - add a call to /boot/grub

Re: [Cooker] Grub fatal issues

2000-12-11 Thread Ed Wilts
On Monday 11 December 2000 06:32, you wrote: > I upgraded to the grub-0.5.96.1-1mdk release yesterday and discovered that > it's fatal. Grub reports an incompability between stage1 and stage2. I just did a strings on stage2 to try and remember the exact error message, and I think it was: "Bad

Re: [Cooker] Grub doesn't handle reiserfs with another ext2fs

2000-11-20 Thread Leon Brooks
Thomas Poindessous wrote: > I want to use grub for booting mandrake on hda and debian on hdc. But as > grub use reiserfs_stage1.5, it can't handle ext2fs. > I tried to install reiserfs-grub on hda and ext2fs-grub on hdc and > chainloader from hda to hdc during the boot, but it doesn't work. > may

Re: [Cooker] Grub doesn't handle reiserfs with another ext2fs

2000-11-20 Thread Pixel
Thomas Poindessous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, I used grub from 7.2 (grub-0.5.95-7mdk). > I have 3 reiserfs part on hda and another ext2fs on hdc. > I want to use grub for booting mandrake on hda and debian on hdc. But as > grub use reiserfs_stage1.5, it can't handle ext2fs. > I tried to in

Re: Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-25 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a > > FMY what is BST ? > British Summer Time, which is GMT + 1 -- -- Pet

Re: Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-25 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Pixel wrote: > Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > BTW, lilo-0.21.5-1mdk.i586.rpm on Cooker gives a nice menu, but it > > installs /boot/boot.b as a link to boot-menu.b, so drakboot can't make you > > a boot floppy - it can't open boot.b. "Progress means d

Re: Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-25 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a > > FMY what is BST ? i believe it include all this city : (chmou@cassini)[share/zoneinfo]-% grep -riw BST * Binary file Amer

Re: Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-25 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a FMY what is BST ? -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-24 Thread Pixel
Franco Silvestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > mkbootdisk don't understand that symlink, I remove symlink boot.b and I cool, fixed :)

Re: Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-24 Thread Franco Silvestro
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > BTW, lilo-0.21.5-1mdk.i586.rpm on Cooker gives a nice menu, but it > > installs /boot/boot.b as a link to boot-menu.b, so drakboot can't make > > you a boot floppy - it c>an't open boot.b. "Progress means deterioation

Re: Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-23 Thread Pixel
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Thanks Pixel, tried that. It's a GRUB bug. /usr/doc/grub-doc-0.5.94/BUGS: >- GRUB hangs up when accessing a disk via Adaptec AIC-7880 > SCSI-controller in LBA mode. It is unknown if this is due to GRUB or > the SCSI BIOS. For now, you

Fwd: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-23 Thread Peter Ruskin
Still not on cooker list at Thu Aug 24 04:31:55 BST 2000, so here's a repost. Hope this doesn't create another darned duplicate. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:14:45 +0100 From: Peter Rusk

Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --Boundary-=_XrJmOWFrxsjyBldbEFSArCBynEcd > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi cookers, > I quite liked GRUB, but since I got a new ATA66 disk and Promise > controller, repartitioned and used my IBM SCSI disk t

Re: [Cooker] GRUB not working with SCSI boot disk

2000-08-21 Thread Pixel
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I quite liked GRUB, but since I got a new ATA66 disk and Promise > controller, repartitioned and used my IBM SCSI disk to boot from, it > doesn't work - all I get is the message `First stage install ...' > > LILO works fine. I've tried different versio

Re: [Cooker] Grub

2000-07-10 Thread Robert L Martin
Didn't explain what I wanted. What I would like, is to have a bootable CD with a Grub menu. It then gives the option whether to continue to boot off the CD, or boot off the hard drive (Like the Windows 98/2000 CDs do...) --

Re: [Cooker] Grub

2000-07-10 Thread Pixel
Alex Boag-Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I would like, is to have a bootable CD with a Grub menu. It then gives > the option whether to continue to boot off the CD, or boot off the hard > drive (Like the Windows 98/2000 CDs do...) > > If I cannot do it with grub, does anyone know ANY

RE: [Cooker] Grub

2000-07-10 Thread Alex Boag-Munroe
an do it with? Help would be greatly appreciated Thanks Alex -Original Message- From: Pixel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 July 2000 3:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Grub Alex Boag-Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone know if it is possible to

Re: [Cooker] Grub

2000-07-10 Thread Pixel
Alex Boag-Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone know if it is possible to make Grub boot off of a CD? booting of a cd needs el torito. that is emulation of a floppy. see mkisofs for more.

Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-27 Thread Quel Qun
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > >Would it be possible for you obtain and try the latest GRUB[1], without >> > >any Mandrake patches? That would help narrow down the problem a bit. >> >> >> could you also try

Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-27 Thread Pixel
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >Would it be possible for you obtain and try the latest GRUB[1], without > > >any Mandrake patches? That would help narrow down the problem a bit. > > > could you also try going to grub's console (with 'c') > and t

Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-27 Thread Pixel
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Would it be possible for you obtain and try the latest GRUB[1], without > >any Mandrake patches? That would help narrow down the problem a bit. could you also try going to grub's console (with 'c') and try command "displaymem"

Re: [Cooker] grub 64 vs lilo 128

2000-04-26 Thread Quel Qun
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Quel Qun wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Can anyone explain to me why the system boots with 128MB of RAM with lilo and only >64MB with grub? >> Everything seems to work fine when I specify mem=128m, but that's still strange. >> Mandrakely, > >(please understand this

Re: [Cooker] GRUB

2000-03-23 Thread Pixel
"David Foresman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is drakx going to go back to lilo at any point in the future? at the moment, it configures both. I'm playing with grub, so sometimes it ends up with grub sometimes with lilo. In expert, there'll be a choice between the 2. anyway, as both are config

Re: [Cooker] GRUB

2000-03-22 Thread Magnus Holmberg
type info grub after you have installed it... You also have a documentation directory in the grub package... /M On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, David Foresman wrote: > I quickly looked through the list archive but didn't find any informat. > > Is there anywhere to get information on how to setup grub?

Re: [Cooker] GRUB

2000-01-03 Thread bodinb
>I think it would be nice if you could include a LILO->GRUB conversion >script in the grub RPM. I started thinking about it, but nothing written yet :-( I believe the disk naming conversion could be quite tricky Other suggestions for grub : internationalisation and keyboard selection (at least a

Re: [Cooker] GRUB

1999-12-21 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On 22 Dec 1999, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have to learn how to count from zero? 8 ) > > well just because it's a different structure of linux. > > > Isn't it a little late to be working Chmouel? > > humm sound like i should go to sleep :), but well a

Re: [Cooker] GRUB

1999-12-21 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 10:23 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB > "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Just out of curiosity, how is your f

Re: [Cooker] GRUB

1999-12-21 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 9:57 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB > "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > the hurd boot loader. handle nicely the