Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-10 Thread SHadowX
On Sunday 10 December 2000 05:02, you wrote: > Vadim Plessky wrote: --snip-- > > 7 ??? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???: > > P.S. I have working QT 2.2.2 binary rpms for LM 7.2, and (god!) it is > > i686 built. (not *default* i586) > > If somebody is interested - let me know. Binary has bi

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-10 Thread Vadim Plessky
Sunday 10 December 2000 04:02, ?? : | Vadim Plessky wrote: | | Vadim, | I would be VERY interested in getting copies of the spec files for both | qt-2.2.2 and KDE 2.0.1. I've already downloaded the source for all but | I prefer to build the rpms myself (I'm not really enamored o

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-09 Thread Arnold Troeger
Vadim Plessky wrote: > > 7 ??? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???: > | On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: > | > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > | > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This > | > > > is a B

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update? (cool, thanks Christopher)

2000-12-09 Thread Zeljko Vukman
On Saturday 09 December 2000 20:03, you wrote: > on 12/7/00 2:41 PM, Christopher Molnar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Guys, please give them a few more days! They are working on it, I've been > > told by my manager. The packagers on the project have not worked with > > kde2 that often before (re

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update? (cool, thanksChristopher)

2000-12-09 Thread mdk mailin list (Harry)
on 12/7/00 2:41 PM, Christopher Molnar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Guys, please give them a few more days! They are working on it, I've been > told by my manager. The packagers on the project have not worked with kde2 > that often before (remember I was doing the packaging) and it is taking a >

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-09 Thread mdk mailin list (Harry)
on 12/7/00 3:15 AM, Vadim Plessky at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | Now I must be serious. Mandrake Comp. said that no final Kde-2.0.1 will > | be available for users of Mandrake 7.2. How charming - have they given a reason as to why? Harry

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-09 Thread Leon Brooks
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > ++ > > > > You have been infected with the Linux Virus! > > > > This virus operates on the honor system. If you run any version of Linux, > > please delete a dozen or so files f

RE: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-08 Thread Steve Wray
I guess wine or dosemu could be infected... > Infected by Linux virus? ...but I am running on Microsoft windows right > now... with McAfee antivirus software... does it like cross platform > infection? > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > > Does it really take that much time and eff

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Lin
Infected by Linux virus? ...but I am running on Microsoft windows right now... with McAfee antivirus software... does it like cross platform infection? On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > Does it really take that much time and effort? I am assuming it is packaged > pretty much the sam

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Daniel Tabuenca
Does it really take that much time and effort? I am assuming it is packaged pretty much the same way as KDE 2.0. Am I wrong? Where is a good resource on learning how to package something? Zeljko Vukman wrote: > On Thursday 07 December 2000 20:56, you wrote: > > How hard can this be? If I got t

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Christopher Molnar
Guys, please give them a few more days! They are working on it, I've been told by my manager. The packagers on the project have not worked with kde2 that often before (remember I was doing the packaging) and it is taking a little longer. -Chris On Thursday 07 December 2000 17:22, you wrote:

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Zeljko Vukman
On Thursday 07 December 2000 20:56, you wrote: > How hard can this be? If I got to the KDE site I find that Caldera has > rpms for it. Redhat has RPMS for both Redhat 6.x and 7.0. SuSe has for > like everything including their SPARC version. The Mandrake has a stupid > readme saying that cooker h

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Daniel Tabuenca
How hard can this be? If I got to the KDE site I find that Caldera has rpms for it. Redhat has RPMS for both Redhat 6.x and 7.0. SuSe has for like everything including their SPARC version. The Mandrake has a stupid readme saying that cooker has a better version. Well, that's great and totally use

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Vadim Plessky
7 ??? 2000 06:46, Steve Wray ???: | I'm starting to become of the opinion that | when one is installing distributions | such as mandrake and redhat, one should pay close | attention to software that one is *particularly* keen on. you are right, indeed! | One should *not* insta

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Vadim Plessky
7 ??? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???: | On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: | > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: | > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This | > > > is a BUG FIX release so I think it is im

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-07 Thread Vadim Plessky
7 ??? 2000 06:22, Christopher Molnar ???: | On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:03, Zeljko Vukman wrote: | > On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: | > > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: | > > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrad

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-06 Thread salane
actually they are pre 2.1 On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:22, you wrote: > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:03, Zeljko Vukman wrote: > > On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > > > > Is there an official set

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-06 Thread Christopher Molnar
On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:03, Zeljko Vukman wrote: > On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: > > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is > > > > a BUG FIX release so I think it i

RE: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-06 Thread Steve Wray
On Behalf Of Zeljko Vukman > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 4:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update? > > > On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: > > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca w

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-06 Thread Zeljko Vukman
On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a > > > BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of > > > Mandrake 7.2 be able to up

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-06 Thread salane
nebsllc.com On Wednesday 06 December 2000 20:51, you wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a > > > BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of > > > Mandrake 7.2 be abl

RE: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-06 Thread Steve Wray
> On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a > > BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of > > Mandrake 7.2 be able to upgrade perhaps even with the mandrake update > > facility. > >

Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?

2000-12-06 Thread Zeljko Vukman
On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a > BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of > Mandrake 7.2 be able to upgrade perhaps even with the mandrake update > facility. > You are dre