On Sunday 10 December 2000 05:02, you wrote:
> Vadim Plessky wrote:
--snip--
> > 7 ??? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???:
> > P.S. I have working QT 2.2.2 binary rpms for LM 7.2, and (god!) it is
> > i686 built. (not *default* i586)
> > If somebody is interested - let me know. Binary has bi
Sunday 10 December 2000 04:02, ?? :
| Vadim Plessky wrote:
|
| Vadim,
| I would be VERY interested in getting copies of the spec files for both
| qt-2.2.2 and KDE 2.0.1. I've already downloaded the source for all but
| I prefer to build the rpms myself (I'm not really enamored o
Vadim Plessky wrote:
>
> 7 ??? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???:
> | On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
> | > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> | > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This
> | > > > is a B
On Saturday 09 December 2000 20:03, you wrote:
> on 12/7/00 2:41 PM, Christopher Molnar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Guys, please give them a few more days! They are working on it, I've been
> > told by my manager. The packagers on the project have not worked with
> > kde2 that often before (re
on 12/7/00 2:41 PM, Christopher Molnar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Guys, please give them a few more days! They are working on it, I've been
> told by my manager. The packagers on the project have not worked with kde2
> that often before (remember I was doing the packaging) and it is taking a
>
on 12/7/00 3:15 AM, Vadim Plessky at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | Now I must be serious. Mandrake Comp. said that no final Kde-2.0.1 will
> | be available for users of Mandrake 7.2.
How charming - have they given a reason as to why?
Harry
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> > ++
> >
> > You have been infected with the Linux Virus!
> >
> > This virus operates on the honor system. If you run any version of Linux,
> > please delete a dozen or so files f
I guess wine or dosemu could be infected...
> Infected by Linux virus? ...but I am running on Microsoft windows right
> now... with McAfee antivirus software... does it like cross platform
> infection?
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
>
> > Does it really take that much time and eff
Infected by Linux virus? ...but I am running on Microsoft windows right
now... with McAfee antivirus software... does it like cross platform
infection?
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> Does it really take that much time and effort? I am assuming it is packaged
> pretty much the sam
Does it really take that much time and effort? I am assuming it is packaged
pretty much the same way as KDE 2.0. Am I wrong? Where is a good resource on
learning how to package something?
Zeljko Vukman wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2000 20:56, you wrote:
> > How hard can this be? If I got t
Guys, please give them a few more days! They are working on it, I've been
told by my manager. The packagers on the project have not worked with kde2
that often before (remember I was doing the packaging) and it is taking a
little longer.
-Chris
On Thursday 07 December 2000 17:22, you wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2000 20:56, you wrote:
> How hard can this be? If I got to the KDE site I find that Caldera has
> rpms for it. Redhat has RPMS for both Redhat 6.x and 7.0. SuSe has for
> like everything including their SPARC version. The Mandrake has a stupid
> readme saying that cooker h
How hard can this be? If I got to the KDE site I find that Caldera has
rpms for it. Redhat has RPMS for both Redhat 6.x and 7.0. SuSe has for
like everything including their SPARC version. The Mandrake has a stupid
readme saying that cooker has a better version. Well, that's great and
totally use
7 ??? 2000 06:46, Steve Wray ???:
| I'm starting to become of the opinion that
| when one is installing distributions
| such as mandrake and redhat, one should pay close
| attention to software that one is *particularly* keen on.
you are right, indeed!
| One should *not* insta
7 ??? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???:
| On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
| > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
| > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This
| > > > is a BUG FIX release so I think it is im
7 ??? 2000 06:22, Christopher Molnar ???:
| On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:03, Zeljko Vukman wrote:
| > On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
| > > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
| > > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrad
actually they are pre 2.1
On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:22, you wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:03, Zeljko Vukman wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> > > > > Is there an official set
On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:03, Zeljko Vukman wrote:
> On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is
> > > > a BUG FIX release so I think it i
On Behalf Of Zeljko Vukman
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update?
>
>
> On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca w
On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a
> > > BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of
> > > Mandrake 7.2 be able to up
nebsllc.com
On Wednesday 06 December 2000 20:51, you wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a
> > > BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of
> > > Mandrake 7.2 be abl
> On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a
> > BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of
> > Mandrake 7.2 be able to upgrade perhaps even with the mandrake update
> > facility.
> >
On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
> Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This is a
> BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users of
> Mandrake 7.2 be able to upgrade perhaps even with the mandrake update
> facility.
>
You are dre
23 matches
Mail list logo