Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > I used redhat before working for mandrake. Once I tried all. The system
> > was completely fucked up.
>
> Have you tried it with 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 7.0, or 7.1? That's what we've been
> using in our classroom setups for two years now, and it works f
>> It's really sad to hear this. Red Hat, SuSE, Slackware,
>> TurboLinux, they all have "Everything" or "Almost
>> Everything" options. I'm curious why it's such a big
>> deal for Mandrake.
>
> Have you tried that option?
>
> I used redhat before working for mandrake. Once I tried all. The sys
>> Have you tried it with 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 7.0, or 7.1? That's what we've
been
>> using in our classroom setups for two years now, and it works flawlessly
>> (although Red Hat had some kickstart bugs around 6.1).
>
> As far as I remember, this must have been with 5.1 or 6.1.
>
> Note that maybe t
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The main problem is that it would need special testing to have this
> feature work flawlessly, and we believe it's long work (time of full
> installs...) and dirty (make special cases to remove the package which
> create most problems), and moreo
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 17:10, Don Head wrote:
> (Catching up on really old e-mail..)
>
> >> Many people are praying for a "all packages" button,
> >> just excluding locales-xx, ispell-xx and so on, but
> >> REALLY ALL. Newby has 30GB hard-disks, please let
> >> them (and me!) install 2,5 GB of fre
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > That we'll never do. We already have tried, this leads
> > to too much problems because of incompat packages. Our
> > business is anyway not to fill up the hd by countless
> > things.
>
> It's really sad to hear this. Red Hat, SuSE, Slackware,
>
(Catching up on really old e-mail..)
>> Many people are praying for a "all packages" button,
>> just excluding locales-xx, ispell-xx and so on, but
>> REALLY ALL. Newby has 30GB hard-disks, please let
>> them (and me!) install 2,5 GB of free software
>> without any pain...
>
> That we'll never d
> > [...]
> >
> > > - No flash plugin (and kdebase-nsplugins) installed by default on a
> > > distro targetting newbies and the desktop.. is it that difficult to
> > > understand that this package is a must for LM?
> >
> > i don't like proprietary stuff ;p
>
> me neither, but I must admit to getti
So sprach Stefan Hußfeldt am Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:43:19PM +0200:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> > No, it's not!!! No telnet-server is good (maybe), but why exclude the
> > client? Not every server is telnet enabled, you know.
>
> Telnetclient is of cau
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> No, it's not!!! No telnet-server is good (maybe), but why exclude the
> client? Not every server is telnet enabled, you know.
Telnetclient is of cause usefull (for server testing: 119, 25, etc.).
--
Und Tschüss.
Stefan
### Ki
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Jose am Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:56:32AM +:
> > No telnet by default is VERY GOOD, if your talking about newbies. Use ssh, I think
> > it is installed by default.
>
> No, it's not!!! No telnet-server is good (maybe),
Claudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Many people are praying for a "all packages" button, just excluding
> locales-xx, ispell-xx and so on, but REALLY ALL. Newby has 30GB hard-disks,
> please let them (and me!) install 2,5 GB of free software without any pain...
That we'll never do. W
So sprach Jose am Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:56:32AM +:
> No telnet by default is VERY GOOD, if your talking about newbies. Use ssh, I think
> it is installed by default.
No, it's not!!! No telnet-server is good (maybe), but why exclude the
client? Not every server is telnet enabled, you know.
Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - No telnet installed by default.. its easy to install but still..
>
> No telnet by default is VERY GOOD, if your talking about newbies. Use ssh, I think
> it is installed by default.
as package "telnet" doesn't contain the telnet server, it's no big pb.
an
Pixel wrote:
> Sarang Lakare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > - No flash plugin (and kdebase-nsplugins) installed by default on a distro
> > targetting newbies and the desktop.. is it that difficult to understand that
> > this package is a must for LM?
>
> i don't like proprietary stuf
On Sunday 29 April 2001 06:06, you wrote:
> Sarang Lakare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > - No flash plugin (and kdebase-nsplugins) installed by default on a
> > distro targetting newbies and the desktop.. is it that difficult to
> > understand that this package is a must for LM?
>
> i
Sarang Lakare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> - No flash plugin (and kdebase-nsplugins) installed by default on a distro
> targetting newbies and the desktop.. is it that difficult to understand that
> this package is a must for LM?
i don't like proprietary stuff ;p
>
> - No telnet inst
>No offense, but where were you all during the Devel Stages? Don't complain
>to the devel team when you weren't out there helping people test it and
I have been complaining and complaining about the package selection since
Beta 2 or Beta3.. there was plenty of time to rectify it.. so please don'
>
> Mandrake is taking a really good distro in 7.2 and making it worse by not
> including things that users really want. Please provide a 8.01 with the
> countless bugs fixed.
>
No offense, but where were you all during the Devel Stages? Don't complain
to the devel team when you weren't out ther
On Friday 27 April 2001 22:03, Sarang Lakare wrote:
[...]
> I had selected "internet station", "multimedia station" and all those
> things.. then why arnt't these packages installed??? How do you expect a
> newbie to figure out what to install to get flash working!! In 7.2 I
> remember flash was w
20 matches
Mail list logo
